Comparison of Home-based Video, Print Checklist and Professional Home Assessment in Detection of Fall Hazards at Home
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02775604|
Recruitment Status : Not yet recruiting
First Posted : May 17, 2016
Last Update Posted : March 21, 2018
The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility and potential impact of video analysis of footage taken with a GoPro camera video in comparison to a homeowner checklist or gold standard home assessment as a means of detecting home fall hazards.
Investigators hypothesize that the assessment of homes for fall hazards with a GoPro camera will be better than a homeowner paper checklist in hazard identification.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Identification of Home Fall Hazards||Behavioral: Home-Based Video Behavioral: Paper Checklist||Not Applicable|
40 community-dwelling adults will be recruited from clinics and the community through posters and advertising (n = 20 in the 50-60 years age group; n = 20 in the 75 years and above age group).
Participants will be randomly allocated to a homeowner paper checklist or a GoPro video assessment and then cross-over to the opposite intervention.
To assess accuracy, a gold standard home assessment will be completed by a trained evaluator, after the homeowner checklist and GoPro video assessment.
Upon completion of the data collection, the evaluator will conduct their assessment (gold standard); review the findings from the GoPro "playback" with the participant, and conduct a semi-structured interview on their prior awareness of fall hazards, perceptions about the different methods of detecting fall hazards in their home; and intentions to remediate identified hazards.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||40 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Crossover Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||Comparison of Home-based Video, Print Checklist and Professional Home Assessment in Detection of Fall Hazards for Older Adults Living at Home: A Pilot Randomized Crossover Trial|
|Estimated Study Start Date :||July 2018|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||December 2018|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||July 2019|
Behavioral: Home-Based Video
The participant will use GoPro technology and follow standardized instructions to inspect each room of their house. They will navigate through their home wearing the GoPro camera, recording images about their home and their usual activities and use a talk-aloud approach to describe what they are doing and seeing. The evaluator will provide no feedback during the assessments.
Homeowner Print Checklist
Behavioral: Paper Checklist
A paper checklist for fall hazards in the home will be completed by the participants based on standardized verbal instruction.
- Fall Hazards [ Time Frame: Within 1 week of completion of assessment ]Fall hazard scores will be calculated based on the number and severity of hazards identified from the paper checklist, the GoPro assesment, and the independent evaluation.
- Feasibility and Fidelity [ Time Frame: Within 1 week of completion of assessment ]A semi-structured interview will be conducted with the participants on their prior awareness of fall hazards and experiences about the different methods of detecting fall hazards in their home.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02775604
|McMaster University||Not yet recruiting|
|Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S 1C7|
|Contact: Margaret Lomotan, BA 905-525-9140 ext 27328 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Principal Investigator: Joy MacDermid, PhD|