Does the Presence of Observers Influence the Success of the Neonatal Endotracheal Intubation?
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02726724|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : April 4, 2016
Last Update Posted : December 19, 2017
The Endotracheal intubation (ETI) of a neonate is a procedure that usually attracts a large number of observers. The fear of being judged by others could cause an increased level of stress, especially on the junior trainees. Little research has focused on the effect of the audience on the level of stress and therefore, on the success rate of complicated procedures in neonatal intensive care.
Hypothesis:Investigators hypothesize that time to successful intubation (in seconds) will be longer with the presence of observers.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Stress||Other: 5 observers Other: 1 observer||Not Applicable|
Objective: The aim of this study will be to provide objective evidence supporting that junior trainees are less successful at neonatal ETI when in the presence of a large audience. If this hypothesis is correct, this data will provide evidence to support the residents request for less people around during the procedure, which may increase the chance of a successful intubation.
After Investigators obtained written consent - the selected student-will be asked to wear a cardiac monitor and 5 minutes later after a period of rest, they will be called in the delivery room. Two minutes after their arrival they will be given a stylet and a 3.5 ET tube and will be asked to intubate orally a mannequin, after 30 seconds, the operator will be reminded of the time. After 45 seconds the attempts will be stopped.
Participants will be informed of their right to discontinue participation at any time. The trainee will be informed at the end of the experience about the aim of the study and will be asked to keep it confidential.
The trainees will be randomized in two groups that differentiate in the conditions under which they will start the intubation.
Condition A: Only the staff will be present with the operator Condition B: An audience of 5 people with at least 2 neonatologists will be present in case of junior resident or the responsible of stage in case of respiratory therapy students.
The residents who performed intubation in condition A will do a repeat intubation 24 hours later using condition B and vice versa. The time and the local of the 2 procedures will be the same in both conditions.
Time to successful intubation will be compared between the two experimental conditions for each subject with paired t test. A p<0.05 will be considered significant.
To estimate the required sample size, Investigators used the study O'Donnel and al who gave an approximate intubation time for trainees of 38 seconds with standard deviation of 20 seconds (14). Using an alpha threshold of 0.05 and power of 80 %, a sample size of 51 subjects is required to detect 8 second difference time between the two different groups. Eight seconds represents a 25 % change in time to intubate and is clinically significant for a newborn.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||51 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Crossover Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||Does the Presence of Observers Influence the Success of the Neonatal Endotracheal Intubation?|
|Study Start Date :||October 2015|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||October 2016|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||October 2016|
Experimental: Condition B
An audience of 5 people with at least 2 neonatologists will be present with the operator during the intubation of the mannequin.
Other: 5 observers
Experimental: Condition A
Only the staff will be present with the operator during the intubation of the mannequin.
Other: 1 observer
- Evaluating the differences in the duration (seconds) to reach intubation of the mannequin between the two experimental conditions. [ Time Frame: 24 hour ]The duration of each individual attempt will be recorded as the time in seconds from insertion of the laryngoscope into the mouth to its removal.
- Variability of the heart rate of the operator between the condition A and B. [ Time Frame: 24 hour ]After investigators obtained written consent - the selected student-will be asked to wear a cardiac monitor. The heart rate will be recorded before, during and after the end of the mannequin intubation. The variability in percentage during the intubation between the condition A and B will be compared.
- The number of wrong ET length position between the condition A and B [ Time Frame: 24 hour ]Length of the position of the tube will be assessed 10 seconds after the intubation. Any position above 10 cm and bellow 8 cm will be considered wrong. The number of wrong ET length position between the condition A and B will be compared.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02726724
|Hopital Maisonneuve Rosemont|
|Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H1T2M4|
|Principal Investigator:||Brahim BB Bensouda, MD||Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital|