Don't get left behind! The modernized ClinicalTrials.gov is coming. Check it out now.
Say goodbye to ClinicalTrials.gov!
The new site is coming soon - go to the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Efficacy Study of Fluconazole to Treat Coccidioidomycosis Pneumonia (Valley Fever)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02663674
Recruitment Status : Terminated (Study terminated due to lack of feasibility of study design.)
First Posted : January 26, 2016
Results First Posted : July 5, 2019
Last Update Posted : July 5, 2019
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

Study Description
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information
Brief Summary:
This is a Phase IV randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study in 1000 individuals aged 18 years or older, with community acquired pneumonia (CAP) who meet all eligibility criteria in endemic regions. This study is designed to provide data on the effectiveness of early antifungal treatment (Fluconazole, 400 mg/day) for coccidioidomycosis pneumonia (also referred to as Valley Fever (VF) Pneumonia or acute onset valley fever) vs. placebo in subjects with coccidioidomycosis pneumonia. Patients who are prescribed antibacterials by their health care provider for acute CAP will be randomized to receive either placebo or 400 mg/day of fluconazole for 42 days. The primary objective is to assess the clinical response of early empiric antifungal therapy with fluconazole at Day 22 in subjects with coccidioidomycosis pneumonia and are compliant with the study intervention.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Coccidioidomycosis Drug: Fluconazole Other: Placebo Phase 4

Detailed Description:
This is a Phase IV randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study in 1000 individuals, aged 18 years or older, with community acquired pneumonia (CAP) who meet all eligibility criteria in endemic regions. This study is designed to provide data on the effectiveness of early antifungal treatment (Fluconazole, 400 mg/day) for coccidioidomycosis pneumonia (also referred to as Valley Fever (VF) Pneumonia or acute onset valley fever) vs. placebo in subjects with coccidioidomycosis pneumonia. Patients who are prescribed antibacterials by their health care provider for acute CAP will be randomized to receive either placebo or 400 mg/day of fluconazole for 42 days. Blood work for serologic determination of coccidioidomycosis infection will be drawn at the time of randomization (Day 1), and again on Days, 22, 29, and 43. On Day 43, subjects will be informed of their treatment assignment and results of serologic testing from Days 1, 22 and 29. At Day 43, those subjects who did not meet the protocol defined case definition for CAP caused by acute coccidioidomycosis and who did not receive fluconazole will be dismissed from the study and referred to a health care provider with the results of their serology testing and their treatment assignment. All subjects who received fluconazole will be evaluated for safety follow up at Day 49. At Day 49, those subjects who did not meet the protocol defined case definition for CAP caused by acute coccidioidomycosis will be dismissed from the study and referred to a health care provider with the results of their serology testing and their treatment assignment. Subjects who did meet the protocol defined case definition for CAP caused by acute coccidioidomycosis infection will be referred to a healthcare provider with the results of their serology testing and their treatment assignment for further treatment as indicated and will be contacted by telephone on Days 90 and 180. The study duration will be approximately 72 months, and the subject participant duration will be from 42 days to approximately 6 months. The primary objective is to assess the clinical response of early empiric antifungal therapy with fluconazole at Day 22 in subjects with coccidioidomycosis pneumonia who are adherent to the study intervention. The secondary objectives are: 1) To assess the clinical response of early empiric antifungal therapy with fluconazole at Day 22 in subjects with coccidioidomycosis pneumonia regardless of adherence with the study intervention; 2) To assess the clinical response of early empiric antifungal therapy with fluconazole at Day 43 in subjects with coccidioidomycosis pneumonia regardless of adherence with the study intervention; 3) To compare the clinical response and its individual components over time, by treatment group, in subjects with coccidioidomycosis pneumonia; 4) To assess the impact of early empiric antifungal therapy with fluconazole on days lost from work or school and responses to the SF-12v2 and PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a in subjects with coccidioidomycosis pneumonia; 5) To assess the effect of early empiric antifungal therapy with fluconazole through Day 43 in subjects with coccidioidomycosis pneumonia on all-cause mortality by treatment group; and 6) To assess whether early empiric antifungal therapy with fluconazole at Day 22 is non-inferior to placebo as defined by clinical response at Day 22 in all randomized subjects, regardless of coccidioidomycosis pneumonia status or adherence with study intervention, with baseline and follow-up FLEET-CAP scores.
Study Design
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 72 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial of Fluconazole as Early Empiric Treatment of Coccidioidomycosis Pneumonia (Valley Fever) in Adults Presenting With Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) in Endemic Areas (FLEET-Valley Fever)
Actual Study Start Date : December 29, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date : June 21, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date : July 31, 2018

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

Drug Information available for: Fluconazole

Arms and Interventions
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Arm Intervention/treatment
Placebo Comparator: Group 1
A single dose of Fluconazole placebo (2 capsules) administered orally once daily for 42 days starting on Day 1. N=500
 Other: Placebo
Placebo will be supplied as matching gelatin capsules containing microcrystalline cellulose only. Capsules are the same size, weight, and color as capsules containing fluconazole tablets.
Experimental: Group 2
400 mg of Fluconazole (2 capsules of 200 mg) administered orally once daily for 42 days starting on Day 1. N=500
 Drug: Fluconazole
Fluconazole is a synthetic triazole antifungal agent. It will be supplied as 200 mg over encapsulated tablets. Each gelatin capsule will contain two-100 mg fluconazole tablets and microcrystalline cellulose for overfill.


Outcome Measures
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. The Proportion of Participants Who Achieve a Clinical Response, Defined as at Least a 50% Reduction in Composite FLEET CAP Score From Baseline, in the Cocci-positive Per-protocol Population [ Time Frame: Visit 2 (Day 20-23) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. The Proportion of Participants Who Achieve a Clinical Response, Defined as at Least a 50% Reduction in Composite FLEET CAP Score From Baseline, in the Cocci Positive Modified Intent-to-Treat Population [ Time Frame: Visit 2 (Day 20-23) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  2. The Proportion of Participants Who Achieve a Clinical Response, Defined as at Least a 50% Reduction in Composite FLEET CAP Score From Baseline, in the All Randomized mITT Population [ Time Frame: Visit 2 (Day 20-23) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  3. The Proportion of Participants Who Achieve a Clinical Response, Defined as at Least a 50% Reduction in Composite FLEET CAP Score From Baseline, in All Randomized Participants Who Took at Least One Dose of Study Medication [ Time Frame: Visit 2 (Day 20-23) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  4. The Proportion of Participants Who Achieve a Clinical Response, Defined as at Least a 50% Reduction in Composite FLEET CAP Score From Baseline, in the Cocci Positive Modified Intent-to-Treat Population [ Time Frame: Visit 2 - Visit 4 (Day 20-46) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome. Note that a participant who responds earlier before Day 43 does not need to achieve a clinical response at Day 43, as well.

  5. The Proportion of Participants Who Achieve a Clinical Response, Defined as at Least a 50% Reduction in Composite FLEET CAP Score From Baseline, in All Randomized Participants Who Took at Least One Dose of Study Medication [ Time Frame: Visit 2 - Visit 4 (Day 20-46) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome. Note that a participant who responds earlier before Day 43 does not need to achieve a clinical response at Day 43, as well.

  6. The Proportion of Participants Who Achieve a Clinical Response, Defined as at Least a 50% Reduction in Composite FLEET CAP Score From Baseline, in the All Randomized mITT Population [ Time Frame: Visit 2 - Visit 4 (Day 20-46) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome. Note that a participant who responds earlier before Day 43 does not need to achieve a clinical response at Day 43, as well.

  7. The Mean and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the ITT Population [ Time Frame: Visit 2 (Day 20-23) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  8. The Median and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the ITT Population [ Time Frame: Visit 2 (Day 20-23) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  9. The Mean and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the ITT Population [ Time Frame: Visit 3 (Day 27-30) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  10. The Median and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the ITT Population [ Time Frame: Visit 3 (Day 27-30) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  11. The Mean and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the ITT Population [ Time Frame: Visit 4 (Day 42-46) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  12. The Median and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the ITT Population [ Time Frame: Visit 4 (Day 42-46) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  13. The Mean and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the Cocci Positive Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population [ Time Frame: Visit 2 (Day 20-23) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  14. The Median and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the Cocci Positive Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population [ Time Frame: Visit 2 (Day 20-23) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  15. The Mean and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the Cocci Positive Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population [ Time Frame: Visit 3 (Day 27-30) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  16. The Median and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the Cocci Positive Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population [ Time Frame: Visit 3 (Day 27-30) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  17. The Mean and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the Cocci Positive Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population [ Time Frame: Visit 4 (Day 42-46) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  18. The Median and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the Cocci Positive Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population [ Time Frame: Visit 4 (Day 42-46) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  19. The Mean and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the All Randomized Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population [ Time Frame: Visit 2 (Day 20-23) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  20. The Median and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the All Randomized Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population [ Time Frame: Visit 2 (Day 20-23) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  21. The Mean and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the All Randomized Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population [ Time Frame: Visit 3 (Day 27-30) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  22. The Median and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the All Randomized Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population [ Time Frame: Visit 3 (Day 27-30) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  23. The Mean and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the All Randomized Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population [ Time Frame: Visit 4 (Day 42-46) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  24. The Median and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the All Randomized Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population [ Time Frame: Visit 4 (Day 42-46) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  25. The Mean and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the Cocci Positive Per-Protocol (PP) Population [ Time Frame: Visit 2 (Day 20-23) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  26. The Median and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the Cocci Positive Per-Protocol (PP) Population [ Time Frame: Visit 2 (Day 20-23) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  27. The Mean and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the Cocci Positive Per-Protocol (PP) Population [ Time Frame: Visit 3 (Day 27-30) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  28. The Median and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the Cocci Positive Per-Protocol (PP) Population [ Time Frame: Visit 3 (Day 27-30) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  29. The Mean and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the Cocci Positive Per-Protocol (PP) Population [ Time Frame: Visit 4 (Day 42-46) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  30. The Median and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the Cocci Positive Per-Protocol (PP) Population [ Time Frame: Visit 4 (Day 42-46) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  31. The Mean and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the All Randomized Per-Protocol (PP) Population [ Time Frame: Visit 2 (Day 20-23) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  32. The Median and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the All Randomized Per-Protocol (PP) Population [ Time Frame: Visit 2 (Day 20-23) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  33. The Mean and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the All Randomized Per-Protocol (PP) Population [ Time Frame: Visit 3 (Day 27-30) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  34. The Median and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the All Randomized Per-Protocol (PP) Population [ Time Frame: Visit 3 (Day 27-30) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  35. The Mean and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the All Randomized Per-Protocol (PP) Population [ Time Frame: Visit 4 (Day 42-46) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  36. The Median and Quartiles of the FLEET CAP Score and Each Component in the All Randomized Per-Protocol (PP) Population [ Time Frame: Visit 4 (Day 42-46) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  37. Number of the Days of School or Work Missed Due to Illness in the ITT Population [ Time Frame: Visit 1 (Day 1) through Visit 4 (Day 42-46) ]
    Number of the days of school or work missed due to illness by participant self-report

  38. Number of the Days of School or Work Missed Due to Illness in the Cocci Positive mITT Population [ Time Frame: Visit 1 (Day 1) through Visit 4 (Day 42-46) ]
    Number of the days of school or work missed due to illness by participant self-report

  39. Number of the Days of School or Work Missed Due to Illness in the All Randomized PP Population [ Time Frame: Visit 1 (Day 1) through Visit 4 (Day 42-46) ]
    Number of the days of school or work missed due to illness by participant self-report

  40. Number of the Days of School or Work Missed Due to Illness in the Cocci Positive PP Population [ Time Frame: Visit 1 (Day 1) through Visit 4 (Day 42-46) ]
    Number of the days of school or work missed due to illness by participant self-report

  41. Number of the Days of School or Work Missed Due to Illness in the All Randomized mITT Population [ Time Frame: Visit 1 (Day 1) through Visit 4 (Day 42-46) ]
    Number of the days of school or work missed due to illness by participant self-report

  42. Number of Participants Responding to the Individual Items of the PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a in the ITT Population [ Time Frame: Visit 2 (Day 20-23) ]
    The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a uses 4 questions to measure the participant's ability to participate in social roles and activities in the context of family, friends, leisure, and work. Four individual items are answered as "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Usually", or "Always" with an "Always" response indicating the most trouble participating in social roles and activities.

  43. Number of Participants Responding to the Individual Items of the PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a in the ITT Population [ Time Frame: Visit 3 (Day 27-30) ]
    The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a uses 4 questions to measure the participant's ability to participate in social roles and activities in the context of family, friends, leisure, and work. Four individual items are answered as "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Usually", or "Always" with an "Always" response indicating the most trouble participating in social roles and activities.

  44. Number of Participants Responding to the Individual Items of the PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a in the ITT Population [ Time Frame: Visit 4 (Day 42-46) ]
    The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a uses 4 questions to measure the participant's ability to participate in social roles and activities in the context of family, friends, leisure, and work. Four individual items are answered as "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Usually", or "Always" with an "Always" response indicating the most trouble participating in social roles and activities.

  45. Number of Participants Responding to the Individual Items of the PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a in the ITT Population [ Time Frame: Visit 6 (Day 83-97) ]
    The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a uses 4 questions to measure the participant's ability to participate in social roles and activities in the context of family, friends, leisure, and work. Four individual items are answered as "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Usually", or "Always" with an "Always" response indicating the most trouble participating in social roles and activities.

  46. Number of Participants Responding to the Individual Items of the PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a in the ITT Population [ Time Frame: Visit 7 (Day 173-187) ]
    The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a uses 4 questions to measure the participant's ability to participate in social roles and activities in the context of family, friends, leisure, and work. Four individual items are answered as "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Usually", or "Always" with an "Always" response indicating the most trouble participating in social roles and activities.

  47. Number of Participants Responding to the Individual Items of the PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a in the Cocci Positive Per Protocol Population [ Time Frame: Visit 2 (Day 20-23) ]
    The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a uses 4 questions to measure the participant's ability to participate in social roles and activities in the context of family, friends, leisure, and work. Four individual items are answered as "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Usually", or "Always" with an "Always" response indicating the most trouble participating in social roles and activities.

  48. Number of Participants Responding to the Individual Items of the PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a in the Cocci Positive Per Protocol Population [ Time Frame: Visit 3 (Day 27-30) ]
    The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a uses 4 questions to measure the participant's ability to participate in social roles and activities in the context of family, friends, leisure, and work. Four individual items are answered as "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Usually", or "Always" with an "Always" response indicating the most trouble participating in social roles and activities.

  49. Number of Participants Responding to the Individual Items of the PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a in the Cocci Positive Per Protocol Population [ Time Frame: Visit 4 (Day 42-46) ]
    The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a uses 4 questions to measure the participant's ability to participate in social roles and activities in the context of family, friends, leisure, and work. Four individual items are answered as "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Usually", or "Always" with an "Always" response indicating the most trouble participating in social roles and activities.

  50. Number of Participants Responding to the Individual Items of the PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a in the Cocci Positive Per Protocol Population [ Time Frame: Visit 6 (Day 83-97) ]
    The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a uses 4 questions to measure the participant's ability to participate in social roles and activities in the context of family, friends, leisure, and work. Four individual items are answered as "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Usually", or "Always" with an "Always" response indicating the most trouble participating in social roles and activities.

  51. Number of Participants Responding to the Individual Items of the PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a in the Cocci Positive Per Protocol Population [ Time Frame: Visit 7 (Day 173-187) ]
    The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a uses 4 questions to measure the participant's ability to participate in social roles and activities in the context of family, friends, leisure, and work. Four individual items are answered as "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Usually", or "Always" with an "Always" response indicating the most trouble participating in social roles and activities.

  52. Number of Participants Responding to the Individual Items of the PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a in the Cocci Positive mITT Population [ Time Frame: Visit 2 (Day 20-23) ]
    The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a uses 4 questions to measure the participant's ability to participate in social roles and activities in the context of family, friends, leisure, and work. Four individual items are answered as "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Usually", or "Always" with an "Always" response indicating the most trouble participating in social roles and activities.

  53. Number of Participants Responding to the Individual Items of the PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a in the Cocci Positive mITT Population [ Time Frame: Visit 3 (Day 27-30) ]
    The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a uses 4 questions to measure the participant's ability to participate in social roles and activities in the context of family, friends, leisure, and work. Four individual items are answered as "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Usually", or "Always" with an "Always" response indicating the most trouble participating in social roles and activities.

  54. Number of Participants Responding to the Individual Items of the PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a in the Cocci Positive mITT Population [ Time Frame: Visit 4 (Day 42-46) ]
    The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a uses 4 questions to measure the participant's ability to participate in social roles and activities in the context of family, friends, leisure, and work. Four individual items are answered as "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Usually", or "Always" with an "Always" response indicating the most trouble participating in social roles and activities.

  55. Number of Participants Responding to the Individual Items of the PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a in the Cocci Positive mITT Population [ Time Frame: Visit 6 (Day 83-97) ]
    The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a uses 4 questions to measure the participant's ability to participate in social roles and activities in the context of family, friends, leisure, and work. Four individual items are answered as "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Usually", or "Always" with an "Always" response indicating the most trouble participating in social roles and activities.

  56. Number of Participants Responding to the Individual Items of the PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a in the Cocci Positive mITT Population [ Time Frame: Visit 7 (Day 173-187) ]
    The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a uses 4 questions to measure the participant's ability to participate in social roles and activities in the context of family, friends, leisure, and work. Four individual items are answered as "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Usually", or "Always" with an "Always" response indicating the most trouble participating in social roles and activities.

  57. Number of Participants Responding to the Individual Items of the PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a in the All Randomized Per Protocol Population [ Time Frame: Visit 2 (Day 20-23) ]
    The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a uses 4 questions to measure the participant's ability to participate in social roles and activities in the context of family, friends, leisure, and work. Four individual items are answered as "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Usually", or "Always" with an "Always" response indicating the most trouble participating in social roles and activities.

  58. Number of Participants Responding to the Individual Items of the PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a in the All Randomized Per Protocol Population [ Time Frame: Visit 3 (Day 27-30) ]
    The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a uses 4 questions to measure the participant's ability to participate in social roles and activities in the context of family, friends, leisure, and work. Four individual items are answered as "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Usually", or "Always" with an "Always" response indicating the most trouble participating in social roles and activities.

  59. Number of Participants Responding to the Individual Items of the PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a in the All Randomized Per Protocol Population [ Time Frame: Visit 4 (Day 42-46) ]
    The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a uses 4 questions to measure the participant's ability to participate in social roles and activities in the context of family, friends, leisure, and work. Four individual items are answered as "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Usually", or "Always" with an "Always" response indicating the most trouble participating in social roles and activities.

  60. Number of Participants Responding to the Individual Items of the PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a in the All Randomized Per Protocol Population [ Time Frame: Visit 6 (Day 83-97) ]
    The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a uses 4 questions to measure the participant's ability to participate in social roles and activities in the context of family, friends, leisure, and work. Four individual items are answered as "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Usually", or "Always" with an "Always" response indicating the most trouble participating in social roles and activities.

  61. Number of Participants Responding to the Individual Items of the PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a in the All Randomized Per Protocol Population [ Time Frame: Visit 7 (Day 173-187) ]
    The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a uses 4 questions to measure the participant's ability to participate in social roles and activities in the context of family, friends, leisure, and work. Four individual items are answered as "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Usually", or "Always" with an "Always" response indicating the most trouble participating in social roles and activities.

  62. Number of Participants Responding to the Individual Items of the PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a in the All Randomized mITT Population [ Time Frame: Visit 2 (Day 20-23) ]
    The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a uses 4 questions to measure the participant's ability to participate in social roles and activities in the context of family, friends, leisure, and work. Four individual items are answered as "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Usually", or "Always" with an "Always" response indicating the most trouble participating in social roles and activities.

  63. Number of Participants Responding to the Individual Items of the PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a in the All Randomized mITT Population [ Time Frame: Visit 3 (Day 27-30) ]
    The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a uses 4 questions to measure the participant's ability to participate in social roles and activities in the context of family, friends, leisure, and work. Four individual items are answered as "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Usually", or "Always" with an "Always" response indicating the most trouble participating in social roles and activities.

  64. Number of Participants Responding to the Individual Items of the PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a in the All Randomized mITT Population [ Time Frame: Visit 4 (Day 42-46) ]
    The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a uses 4 questions to measure the participant's ability to participate in social roles and activities in the context of family, friends, leisure, and work. Four individual items are answered as "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Usually", or "Always" with an "Always" response indicating the most trouble participating in social roles and activities.

  65. Number of Participants Responding to the Individual Items of the PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a in the All Randomized mITT Population [ Time Frame: Visit 6 (Day 83-97) ]
    The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a uses 4 questions to measure the participant's ability to participate in social roles and activities in the context of family, friends, leisure, and work. Four individual items are answered as "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Usually", or "Always" with an "Always" response indicating the most trouble participating in social roles and activities.

  66. Number of Participants Responding to the Individual Items of the PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a in the All Randomized mITT Population [ Time Frame: Visit 7 (Day 173-187) ]
    The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 4a uses 4 questions to measure the participant's ability to participate in social roles and activities in the context of family, friends, leisure, and work. Four individual items are answered as "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Usually", or "Always" with an "Always" response indicating the most trouble participating in social roles and activities.

  67. Incidence Rate of All-cause Mortality [ Time Frame: Day 1 through Day 43 ]
    Mortality information was obtained through medical records or next of kin.

  68. The Proportion of Participants Who Achieve a Clinical Response, Defined as at Least a 50% Reduction in Composite FLEET CAP Score From Baseline, in All Randomized Participants, Regardless of Coccidioidomycosis Status or Adherence to Study Drug [ Time Frame: Visit 2 (Day 20-23) ]
    The Modified Scoring System for Evaluating Treatment Response in Early Coccidioidal Pneumonia (FLEET CAP) score is a clinical scoring system that allows a constellation of clinical symptoms to be quantified and scored over time: cough, fatigue, chest pain, dyspnea, sputum production, night sweats, fever and hypoxia. The recall period for symptom assessments was during the past week, with the exception of fever and hypoxia, which was measured on the day the FLEET CAP was administered. All symptoms are graded on a 0-3 severity scale, except for night sweats and hypoxia which are graded on a 0-2 severity scale, where 0 indicates the symptom is absent or normal. The range of total scores is from 0-22, where higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.

  69. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 1 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  70. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 22 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  71. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 29 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  72. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 43 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  73. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 90 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  74. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 180 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  75. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, Cocci Positive PP Population [ Time Frame: Day 1 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  76. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, Cocci Positive PP Population [ Time Frame: Day 22 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  77. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, Cocci Positive PP Population [ Time Frame: Day 29 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  78. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, Cocci Positive PP Population [ Time Frame: Day 43 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  79. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, Cocci Positive PP Population [ Time Frame: Day 90 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  80. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, Cocci Positive PP Population [ Time Frame: Day 180 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  81. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, Cocci Positive mITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 1 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  82. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, Cocci Positive mITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 22 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  83. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, Cocci Positive mITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 29 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  84. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, Cocci Positive mITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 43 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  85. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, Cocci Positive mITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 90 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  86. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, Cocci Positive mITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 180 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  87. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, All Randomized PP Population [ Time Frame: Day 1 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  88. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, All Randomized PP Population [ Time Frame: Day 22 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  89. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, All Randomized PP Population [ Time Frame: Day 29 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  90. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, All Randomized PP Population [ Time Frame: Day 43 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  91. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, All Randomized PP Population [ Time Frame: Day 90 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  92. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, All Randomized PP Population [ Time Frame: Day 180 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  93. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, All Randomized mITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 1 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  94. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, All Randomized mITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 22 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  95. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, All Randomized mITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 29 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  96. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, All Randomized mITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 43 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  97. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, All Randomized mITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 90 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  98. The Mean for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, All Randomized mITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 180 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  99. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 1 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  100. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 22 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  101. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 29 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  102. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 43 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  103. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 90 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  104. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, ITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 180 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  105. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, Cocci-positive Per-protocol Population [ Time Frame: Day 1 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  106. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, Cocci-positive Per-protocol Population [ Time Frame: Day 22 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  107. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, Cocci-positive Per-protocol Population [ Time Frame: Day 29 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  108. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, Cocci-positive Per-protocol Population [ Time Frame: Day 43 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  109. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, Cocci-positive Per-protocol Population [ Time Frame: Day 90 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  110. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, Cocci-positive Per-protocol Population [ Time Frame: Day 180 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  111. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, Cocci Positive Modified Intent-to-Treat Population [ Time Frame: Day 1 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  112. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, Cocci Positive Modified Intent-to-Treat Population [ Time Frame: Day 22 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  113. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, Cocci Positive Modified Intent-to-Treat Population [ Time Frame: Day 29 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  114. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, Cocci Positive Modified Intent-to-Treat Population [ Time Frame: Day 43 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  115. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, Cocci Positive Modified Intent-to-Treat Population [ Time Frame: Day 90 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  116. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, Cocci Positive Modified Intent-to-Treat Population [ Time Frame: Day 180 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  117. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, All Randomized PP Population [ Time Frame: Day 1 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  118. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, All Randomized PP Population [ Time Frame: Day 22 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  119. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, All Randomized PP Population [ Time Frame: Day 29 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  120. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, All Randomized PP Population [ Time Frame: Day 43 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  121. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, All Randomized PP Population [ Time Frame: Day 90 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  122. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, All Randomized PP Population [ Time Frame: Day 180 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  123. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, All Randomized mITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 1 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  124. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, All Randomized mITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 22 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  125. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, All Randomized mITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 29 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  126. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, All Randomized mITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 43 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  127. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, All Randomized mITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 90 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.

  128. The Median for the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores of the SF-12v2 Instrument, All Randomized mITT Population [ Time Frame: Day 180 ]
    The SF-12v2 uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the study participant's perspective across eight domains: physical functioning, role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Mental and physical composite scores (MCS & PCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates better health.


Eligibility Criteria
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 99 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged > / = 18 years and presenting for clinical care in coccidioidomycosis endemic areas.
  2. Have a health care provider who has decided to treat community acquired pneumonia with antibacterials.
  3. Be able to take and tolerate oral antibacterials/antifungals.
  4. Able to understand the study and provide informed consent.
  5. Willing and able to comply with study procedures and complete study visits.
  6. Willing to allow access to medical records, and medical records are available to the study team.
  7. The first dosage of study drug will be administered within 72 hours of presentation for care.
  8. Able to swallow large pills.

  9. Sexually active female subjects must be of non-childbearing potential* or, if of childbearing potential, must use a highly effective method of birth control**(captured on the appropriate data collection form).

    *Non-childbearing potential is defined as being post-menopausal for at least 18 months or surgically sterile via bilateral oophorectomy or hysterectomy.

    **Female subjects must avoid becoming pregnant by using one of the following acceptable methods of birth control for 30 days prior to study drug dosing and must be maintained for 30 days after last dose of study drug: i. Intrauterine contraceptive device; OR ii. Oral contraceptives; OR iii. Implanon, Nexplanon, DepoProvera, contraceptive skin patch or NuvaRing; OR iv. Tubal ligation; OR v. Exclusively same-sex relationships.

  10. Non-pregnant female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test within 24 hours prior to enrollment and at Visits 02 - 03.
  11. Subjects receiving any of the drugs reported to have manageable drug interactions with fluconazole are allowed to be enrolled based on PI clinical judgment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Have recently received an experimental agent* or participating in or planning to participate in a study involving an experimental agent** while in the active drug administration phase of this study.

    *defined as within 30 days prior to enrollment in this study.

    **(e.g., vaccine, drug, biologic device, blood product, or medication).

  2. Present clinical diagnosis of hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP).
  3. Documented microbiologically- or serologically-confirmed past infection with coccidioidomycosis.
  4. Clinical diagnosis of coccidioidal infection that is of sufficient certainty as to exclude the need for antibacterial therapy.

  5. Have a history of systemic antibacterial treatment for this current CAP care episode occurring greater than 4 weeks prior to enrollment*.

    *Receipt of systemic antimicrobial therapy for indications other than respiratory tract infection is permitted.

  6. Have a history of systemic antifungal treatment within the 4 weeks prior to enrollment.

    • A single dose of fluconazole (ex. treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis) is acceptable and should not exclude subject from study.

  7. Long term use* of high dose oral or parenteral glucocorticoids**; or high-dose inhaled steroids*** taken within the 4 weeks prior to enrollment.

    *defined as > 8 weeks of daily use.

    **high dose defined as prednisone > / = 20 mg total daily dose, or equivalent dose of other glucocorticoids.

    ***high dose defined as > 800 mcg/day of beclomethasone dipropionate or equivalent

  8. Have confirmed or suspected immunosuppression as a result of an underlying illness [other than well controlled HIV infection], primary immunodeficiency, or treatment, or induction/maintenance use of immunosuppressive agents*.

    *including anti-neoplastic chemotherapy or cytotoxic radiation therapy for cancer, anti-TNF medications, or other immunomodulating agents.

  9. History of a solid organ or bone marrow transplant.
  10. Have poorly controlled HIV-infection or HIV-infection treated with Lopinavir, Tipranavir, Etravirine or Didanosine. Poorly controlled HIV is defined as HIV RNA > 50 copies/mm^3 (or greater than the lower limit of quantification [LLOQ] of the local HIV RNA assay if the LLOQ is > 50) in the 6 months prior to current care episode regardless of whether patient is on antiretroviral therapy or CD4 < 250 cell/mm^3.
  11. Current diagnosis and/or treatment of active liver disease including abnormal baseline liver function tests as defined as: total bilirubin greater than or equal to 3.0 mg/dL AND either AST greater than or equal to 135 IU/L OR ALT greater than or equal to 150 IU/L.
  12. On hemo or peritoneal dialysis or have a creatinine of > / = 2.0 mg/dL or estimated CrCl < /= 50 mL/min.
  13. History of hypokalemia defined as less than 3.5 mEQ/L on more than one occasion during the 4 weeks prior to enrollment.
  14. History of cardiovascular disease with increased risk for torsades de pointes as defined as: i. NYHA Heart Failure Criteria III or greater; OR ii. History of atrial or ventricular dysrhythmias; OR iii. History of structural heart disease (including previously repaired); OR iv.Personal or family history of congenital long QT syndrome.

  15. A marked baseline prolongation of the QT/QTc interval defined as a QTc interval > 450 milliseconds (ms) for male subjects or > 470ms for female subjects with repeated demonstration*.

    *Subjects without a history of prolonged QTc and an abnormal baseline QTc interval should undergo repeat ECG assessment within screening period prior to randomization (72 hours) to confirm prolongation. If the repeat ECG QTc is within normal limits and less than the parameters above, the subject may be considered for enrollment.

  16. Pregnant or lactating females.
  17. History of azole intolerance or allergy.
  18. Individuals for whom study participation would not be in their best interest, as determined by the clinical investigator.
  19. Are taking medications that are contraindicated with concurrent use of fluconazole.
  20. Positive point of care HIV test at Day 1 visit consistent with new HIV diagnosis.
Contacts and Locations
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02663674


Locations
Layout table for location information
United States, Arizona
Banner - University Medical Center Advanced Lung Disease Clinic - Phoenix
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85006
St Josephs Hospital and Medical Center - Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation - Phoenix
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85013
Mayo Clinic, Phoenix - Infectious Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85054-4502
Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale - Infectious Diseases
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85259-5452
The University of Arizona - Banner University Medical Center Tucson Campus - Tucson
Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85724-0001
United States, California
Kaiser Permanente Chester Avenue Medical Offices - Pulmonology
Bakersfield, California, United States, 93301
Kern Medical Center - Medicine
Bakersfield, California, United States, 93306-4018
UCSF Fresno Center for Medical Education and Research - Clinical Research Center
Fresno, California, United States, 93701
Kaiser Permanente Antelope Valley Medical Offices - Infectious Diseases
Lancaster, California, United States, 93534
Sponsors and Collaborators
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
  Study Documents (Full-Text)

Documents provided by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID):
Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan  [PDF] March 29, 2018

More Information
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02663674    
Other Study ID Numbers: 14-0053
HHSN272201300017I
First Posted: January 26, 2016    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: July 5, 2019
Last Update Posted: July 5, 2019
Last Verified: March 2019

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID):
CAP
Coccidioidomycosis
Community Acquired Pneumonia
FLEET
 Fluconazole
Parent Study of 16-0008
Pneumonia
Valley Fever
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Pneumonia
Coccidioidomycosis
Coccidiosis
Respiratory Tract Infections
Infections
Lung Diseases
Respiratory Tract Diseases
Mycoses
Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Protozoan Infections
Parasitic Diseases
Fluconazole
 Antifungal Agents
Anti-Infective Agents
14-alpha Demethylase Inhibitors
Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors
Enzyme Inhibitors
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Steroid Synthesis Inhibitors
Hormone Antagonists
Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9 Inhibitors
Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19 Inhibitors