ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Caring Touch as a Bodily Anchor for Patients After Sustaining a Motor Vehicle Accident

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02610205
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : November 20, 2015
Last Update Posted : November 23, 2015
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Karolinska Institutet
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Fanny Airosa, Karolinska University Hospital

Brief Summary:
The aim of this study was to explore participants´ subjective experiences and perspectives on pain and other factors of importance after an early nursing intervention consisting of "caring touch" (tactile massage and healing touch) for participants subjected to a motor vehicle accident with minor or no physical injuries.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment
Emergency Other: caring touch

Detailed Description:

The study was conducted as a longitudinal study, combining qualitative and quantitative perspectives, i.e. a mixed-methods design. The rationale for combining quantitative and qualitative methods was to provide a comprehensive exploration of the research question.Investigators conducted the interviews in a closed meeting room at the hospital, three months after the participant´s first hospital visit. The time span was set to allow the participants to conclude their treatments with caring touch. The interviews, which lasted up to 60 minutes, were conducted in Swedish, digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim by the investigators. An open-ended question was used to initiate the interviews. The quantitative primary outcome was current level of pain measured by VAS, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst imaginable pain). Participants rated their current VAS pain at baseline during the initial visit and before and after each treatment session with caring touch, and then again via a postal follow-up after six months. Secondary exploratory outcomes were sense of coherence (SOC), constructed by Antonovsky on the basis of a salutogenic model. The Sense of Coherence scale was of interest since this instrument capture the participants' experiences of comprehensibility, manageability, and meaningfulness which we assumed could be linked to participant recovery. SOC, a 13-item rating scale, developed using the subscales of comprehensibility, manageability, and meaningfulness. Total scores of 21-59 indicate low sense of coherence, 60-74 an average sense of coherence, and 75-91 high sense of coherence. Additionally, the Impact of Event Scale (IES-R) has been well used in previous trauma research and was decided as being an appropriate tool to explore to what extent the participants experienced post-traumatic stress disease. IES-R, 22-item scale shows the degree to which the traumatic experience is felt on a consciousness level, and if the person exhibits avoidant behaviour. The IES-R is based on a 4-point frequency scales (i.e., 0=not at all, 1= a little bit, 2= moderately, 3=quite a bit, and 4=extremely). An average of the total scale sum of 1.8-2.0 indicates post-traumatic stress disorder. The IES-R seems to be a solid measure of post-traumatic phenomena that can augment related assessment approaches in clinical and research contexts. The European Quality of Life (EQ-5D) instrument was employed to explore participants´ health-related quality of life and self-related health. The EQ-5D instrument was selected because of the short-form and that it has been widely used to measure quality of life among the County Councils of Sweden. EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for measuring health outcome. Participants classify their health in terms of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has three levels of severity: (1) no problems, (2) moderate problems, and (3) severe problems. From the sum a number of total 243 combinations of health can be created. Each health combination generates an index value from -0.59 to 1.0, where 1.0 indicates full health. Additionally, the EQ-5D has a visual analogue scale for self-rated health with the anchors at zero (worst imaginable health) up to 100 (best imaginable health).

Data from VAS pain ratings and questionnaires was manually transferred from paper into an electronic database before statistical analysis. Summary characteristics of participants were presented as proportions, mean, median, standard deviation and/or min-max values. Change scores of VAS pain ratings, SOC, IES-R and EQ-5D over time between baseline and follow-up after six months were analysed for patients with complete data. Considering rating scales and ordinal types of data, and the relatively small sample sizes, non-parametric statistical analysis, i.e. the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was employed for assessing change scores over time. All p-value calculations were conducted with a 5% significance level. An additional descriptive analysis was conducted for VAS pain ratings before and after each treatment session with caring touch. Computational software included STATA 13, StataCorp, USA and Microsoft Excel 2011, Microsoft, USA.


Study Type : Observational
Actual Enrollment : 41 participants
Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Prospective
Official Title: Integrative Care at the Emergency Department
Study Start Date : September 2012
Actual Primary Completion Date : January 2014
Actual Study Completion Date : May 2014

Group/Cohort Intervention/treatment
Caring touch interventions
The study was conducted as a mixed-methods design. A recruitment of potential study participants was made up from a list of incoming patients arriving at the emergency department following an MVA, and who upon medical examinations were given an injury severity score between 0-3 and subsequently discharged straight home. ISS is a 0-8 point scale rating injury severity, where a rating of 0 indicates no physical injury; 1-3 represents minor physical injuries. The patients were informed about the study by mail during the week after the MVA, and those interested in participating in the caring touch intervention were asked to contact the investigator and subsequently completed a written informed consent form during the first encounter with the therapist.
Other: caring touch
The caring touch was adjusted to suit each participant and lasted for 20-60 minutes, once a week, for a maximum of eight treatment sessions altogether. The tactile massage, a soft tissue massage, without applying direct pressure or stretching to the muscles. The massage can be described as slow, gentle, structured, circulating movements with the palm of the therapist's hand, during which natural oil, or oil with the fragrance of lavender, was applied. The healing touch was based on an established procedure, during which the therapist applied a light pressure to the feet, ankles, knees, hips, stomach, heart area, arms, throat, forehead and scalp. The participant was fully dressed during the healing touch, as the therapist used her/his hand in different positions on the participant's body.
Other Names:
  • healing touch
  • tactile massage




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Qualitative interviews [ Time Frame: Three months after inclusion ]
    The interviews, which lasted up to 60 minutes, were conducted in Swedish, digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim by the investigator. An open-ended question was used to initiate the interviews. The interviews were analysed using Systematic Text Condensation (STC), based on Giorgi`s psychological phenomenological analysis. The procedure consisted of the following steps: 1) An overview of the data was established, reading through all the interview transcripts; 2) A systematic review of the interviews was made line by line, identifying and sorting meaning units; 3) Meaning units were systematically abstracted and sorted into thematic code groups across individual participants; 4) data was synthesized from the thematic code groups to descriptions and concepts.

  2. Visual analogue scale (VAS) [ Time Frame: Change from baseline pain at 6 months ]
    The quantitative primary outcome was current level of pain measured by VAS, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst imaginable pain). Participants rated their current VAS pain at baseline during the initial visit and before and after each treatment session with caring touch, and then again via a postal follow-up after six months. The VAS is a standard instrument for assessing pain that was feasible for the nurses to use in the emergency care setting.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Sense of coherence (SOC) scale [ Time Frame: Change from baselines sence of coherence at 6 months ]
    The Sense of Coherence scale was of interest since this instrument capture the participants' experiences of comprehensibility, manageability, and meaningfulness which we assumed could be linked to participants recovery. SOC, a 13-item rating scale, developed using the subscales of comprehensibility, manageability, and meaningfulness. Total scores of 21-59 indicate low sense of coherence, 60-74 an average sense of coherence, and 75-91 high sense of coherence

  2. Impact of Event Scale (IES-R) [ Time Frame: Change from baselines post traumatic stress at 6 months ]
    The Impact of Event Scale has been well used in previous trauma research and was decided as being an appropriate tool to explore to what extent the participants experienced post-traumatic stress disease. IES-R, 22-item scale shows the degree to which the traumatic experience is felt on a consciousness level, and if the person exhibits avoidant behaviour. The IES-R is based on a 4-point frequency scales (i.e., 0=not at all, 1= a little bit, 2= moderately, 3=quite a bit, and 4=extremely). An average of the total scale sum of 1.8-2.0 indicates post-traumatic stress disorder. The IES-R seems to be a solid measure of post-traumatic phenomena that can augment related assessment approaches in clinical and research contexts.

  3. The European Quality of Life (EQ-5D) [ Time Frame: Change from baselines quality of life at 6 months ]
    The European Quality of Life (EQ-5D) instrument was employed to explore participants´ health-related quality of life and self-related health. The EQ-5D instrument was selected because of the short-form and that it has been widely used to measure quality of life among the County Councils of Sweden. EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for measuring health outcome. Participants classify their health in terms of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has three levels of severity: (1) no problems, (2) moderate problems, and (3) severe problems. From the sum a number of total 243 combinations of health can be created. Each health combination generates an index value from -0.59 to 1.0, where 1.0 indicates full health. Additionally, the EQ-5D has a visual analogue scale for self-rated health with the anchors at zero (worst imaginable health) up to 100 (best imaginable health).



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Sampling Method:   Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
A recruitment of potential study participants was made up from a list of incoming patients, arriving at the emergency department following an MVA, and who upon medical examinations were given an injury severity score (ISS) between 0-3 and subsequently discharged straight home. ISS is a 0-8 point scale rating injury severity, where a rating of 0 indicates no physical injury, 1-3 represents minor physical injuries; and 8 corresponds to a life-threatening injury
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • literate in Swedish and cognitively intact, arriving at the emergency department following an MVA, and who upon medical examinations were given an injury severity score (ISS) between 0-3 and subsequently discharged straight home.

Exclusion Criteria:


Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02610205


Sponsors and Collaborators
Fanny Airosa
Karolinska Institutet
Investigators
Study Director: Torkel Falkenberg, PhD Karolinska Institutet

Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Responsible Party: Fanny Airosa, Manager of Nursing Development, Emergency Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02610205     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: Touch-ED
First Posted: November 20, 2015    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: November 23, 2015
Last Verified: November 2015

Keywords provided by Fanny Airosa, Karolinska University Hospital:
Caring touch
Tactile massage
Healing touch

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Emergencies
Disease Attributes
Pathologic Processes