Working...
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Buscopan Versus Acetaminophen for Acute Abdominal Pain in Children

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02582307
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : October 21, 2015
Last Update Posted : May 2, 2019
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Lawson Health Research Institute

Brief Summary:
There is ample evidence that pain in children is under recognized and under treated. This is especially true for acute abdominal pain, a common complaint in the paediatric emergency department. Clinicians often fear that analgesia will obscure the diagnosis of a potentially surgical condition. As a result, acute abdominal pain goes untreated in many children, as there is no standard of care. Hyoscine N-butylbromide (Buscopan) has been used successfully in adults and children for pain associated with urinary tract infections and kidney stones for over 60 years. However, no study has explored its usefulness in relieving acute abdominal pain in children. The objectives of this study are to investigate to what degree Buscopan is effective in relieving abdominal pain in children compared to acetaminophen.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Abdomen, Acute Children Drug: Acetaminophen, Analgesics, Non-Narcotic Drug: Hyoscine butylbromide, Analgesics, Non-Narcotic Phase 3

Detailed Description:
Acute abdominal pain is a common complaint among paediatric patients visiting the emergency department (ED). Functional abdominal pain is not associated with any surgical or infectious etiology and is a frequent cause of painful abdominal cramps. Although functional abdominal pain is not life-threatening, it has significant impact on quality of life, functional outcomes, and patient satisfaction. It is a major source of school and work absence, loss of sleep, and extracurricular impairment. Despite this, analgesia has traditionally been withheld from patients with acute abdominal pain. The reasons behind this are likely two-fold. First, there is good evidence that clinicians fear that analgesia will mask signs of an underlying surgical pathology such as appendicitis. There is no current published literature that supports this practice. In fact, recent evidence has found that providing analgesia to children does not obscure signs of an acute surgical abdomen nor lead to clinically significant differences in negative outcomes. Second, there is no standard of care specifying the best analgesic options for treating abdominal pain in children in the post-codeine era. Although acetaminophen, ibuprofen, ketorolac, buscopan, and almagel/viscous lidocaine are frequently used agents in the ED, evidence for their benefit in children with functional abdominal pain is lacking. As a predictable result, most patients who present with abdominal pain fail to experience pain relief at discharge. The importance of providing optimal pain treatment is echoed by several national and international level policy statements. In addition to the World Health Organization (WHO)'s mandate that adequate pain treatment should be a fundamental human right, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has reaffirmed its position that adequate analgesia be provided for children. Furthermore, literature supports that providing analgesia improves patient care, caregiver satisfaction, and the therapeutic relationship. Antispasmodics are commonly used agents to treat abdominal cramping. Hyoscine butylbromide (HBB), trade name: Buscopan, is an anticholinergic agent that when orally administered, does not cross the blood brain barrier and has minimal systemic absorption. Therefore, it inhibits bowel motility without central nervous system or peripheral side effects. This antispasmodic has been used in clinical practice for over 60 years and specifically has been on the market since 1952 for the treatment of abdominal cramps. It is widely available around the world as both a prescription drug and an over the counter medication in many industrialized countries. It has also been used safely in neonates and children. As hyoscine butylbromide is barely absorbed, it is generally well tolerated. In the two large-scale studies of almost 1200 patients that compared HBB with placebo (and paracetamol), there was no significant difference in adverse events between the two groups, including those commonly associated with anticholinergics, such as nausea, constipation, dry mouth, blurred vision, tachycardia and urinary retention. Moreover, these adverse events not only occurred at a low incidence (less than or equal to 1.5%) but were also usually mild and self-limiting. In abdominal cramping and pain associated with irritable bowel syndrome, systematic reviews have had conflicting results with regards to analgesic efficacy, primarily because of small sample sizes and less rigorous designs. Muller-Krampe et al. conducted a prospective cohort of over 200 children with both acute and chronic abdominal spasms and compared the effectiveness of oral HBB 10 mg to a homeopathic preparation. HBB demonstrated comparative improvements to the homeopathic preparation with respect to pain, sleep disturbance, eating and drinking, and crying. Over 90% of patients in both groups reported good tolerability and there were no adverse events. Although HBB is used widely for abdominal pain in children and anecdotal evidence suggests it is efficacious, no paediatric clinical trial to date has explored its efficacy in the ED setting. The investigators hypothesize that HBB will have superior efficacy to the most commonly used agent, acetaminophen for acute abdominal pain in children. If HBB is found to be an effective analgesic in children with acute abdominal pain, it could provide a therapeutic option for a common, painful condition for which there is currently very little to offer.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 236 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Hyoscine Hydrobromide (Buscopan) Versus Acetaminophen for Acute Abdominal Pain in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Actual Study Start Date : March 20, 2017
Actual Primary Completion Date : December 3, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date : February 22, 2019

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Abdominal Pain

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Hyoscine butylbromide
Hyoscine butylbromide 10mg oral single dose
Drug: Hyoscine butylbromide, Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
Oral single dose
Other Name: Buscopan

Active Comparator: Acetaminophen
Acetaminophen 15mg/kg oral single dose (maximum 1000mg)
Drug: Acetaminophen, Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
Oral single dose
Other Name: Tylenol




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Analgesic Efficacy [ Time Frame: 80 minutes post-intervention ]
    Pain severity on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Analgesic Efficacy [ Time Frame: 15 minutes post-intervention ]
    Pain severity on Faces Pain Scale - Revised and VAS

  2. Analgesic Efficacy [ Time Frame: 30 minutes post-intervention ]
    Pain severity on Faces Pain Scale - Revised and VAS

  3. Analgesic Efficacy [ Time Frame: 45 minutes post-intervention ]
    Pain severity on Faces Pain Scale - Revised and VAS

  4. Analgesic Efficacy [ Time Frame: 60 minutes post-intervention ]
    Pain severity on Faces Pain Scale - Revised and VAS

  5. Need for Rescue Analgesia [ Time Frame: 80 minutes post-intervention ]
    Frequency of rescue analgesia

  6. Time to Analgesia [ Time Frame: 80 minutes post-intervention ]
    Time to Achieve 20% Reduction in Faces Pain Score - Revised from time 0

  7. Adequacy of Sedation [ Time Frame: 80 minutes post-intervention ]
    Proportion of participants that achieve a pain score < 30 mm on the VAS

  8. Adverse Effects [ Time Frame: 80 minutes post-intervention ]
    Frequency of Adverse Effects

  9. Caregiver Satisfaction [ Time Frame: 80 minutes post-intervention ]
    Satisfaction scores on 5-Item Likert Scale

  10. Return visits [ Time Frame: 72 hours post discharge ]
    Proportion of participants with return visits for surgical pathology



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   8 Years to 17 Years   (Child)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All children aged 8-17 years presenting to the paediatric ED with:

    1. A chief complaint of colicky abdominal pain AND
    2. Pain score of at least 4/10 on the Faces Pain Scale - Revised AND
    3. A presumed non-surgical etiology

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior abdominal surgery
  2. Concomitant use of other anticholinergic medication including but not limited to tricyclic antidepressants, antihistamines, benztropine mesylate
  3. Signs and symptoms consistent with a bowel obstruction
  4. Peritoneal signs
  5. Suspected previous hypersensitivity reaction to either acetaminophen or HBB
  6. Suspected appendicitis
  7. History of abdominal trauma within 48 hours of presentation
  8. Unstable vital signs
  9. History of bowel obstruction
  10. Myasthenia gravis
  11. Fever (aural temperature > 38.2 C)
  12. Chronic liver disease
  13. Persistent vomiting despite administration of oral anti-emetic
  14. Symptoms and signs consistent with a urinary tract infection
  15. Symptoms and signs consistent with a toxin ingestion
  16. Symptoms and signs consistent with gynecological or gonadal pathology
  17. Symptoms and signs consistent with vasoocclusive crisis in a patient with a hemoglobinopathy

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02582307


Locations
Layout table for location information
Canada, Ontario
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, Canada, N6A5W9
Sponsors and Collaborators
Lawson Health Research Institute
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Naveen Poonai, MD Western University Health

Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Lawson Health Research Institute
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02582307     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 107243
First Posted: October 21, 2015    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: May 2, 2019
Last Verified: April 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Abdominal Pain
Abdomen, Acute
Pain
Neurologic Manifestations
Signs and Symptoms
Signs and Symptoms, Digestive
Acetaminophen
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
Analgesics
Scopolamine
Butylscopolammonium Bromide
Sensory System Agents
Peripheral Nervous System Agents
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Antipyretics
Adjuvants, Anesthesia
Antiemetics
Autonomic Agents
Gastrointestinal Agents
Mydriatics
Cholinergic Antagonists
Cholinergic Agents
Neurotransmitter Agents
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Muscarinic Antagonists
Parasympatholytics