Apraxia of Speech: Comparison of EPG Treatment (Tx) and Sound Production Treatment (SPT) (EPG&SPT)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02554513|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : September 18, 2015
Last Update Posted : December 6, 2017
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Apraxias Communication Disorders Speech Disorders||Device: EPG Tx Behavioral: SPT||Not Applicable|
EPG has been used to treat apraxia of speech (AOS) as well as other speech production disorders (i.e., articulation disorders & cleft palate). SPT is one of the most systematically studied treatment approaches for AOS. Both treatment approaches are considered clinical treatment approaches/standards of care for AOS. The pseudopalate used in conjunction with EPG treatment is an acceptable device for treating speech production disorders including AOS. The pseudopalate is custom-fit for each patient and is similar to a dental retainer and is considered minimally invasive.
The purpose of this research is to systematically examine the effects of treatment on speech production using EPG treatment vs. an SPT approach. The planned investigation is intended to explicate the acquisition, maintenance, and generalization effects of each treatment approach. The specific experimental questions to be addressed are as follows:
- Will treatment using an EPG approach or an SPT approach result in greater accuracy of articulation of trained speech sounds produced in words?
- Will treatment using an EPG approach or an SPT approach result in greater accuracy of articulation of untrained exemplars of trained speech sounds produced in words (i.e., response generalization)?
- Will treatment using an EPG approach or an SPT approach result in greater long term maintenance effects for trained speech sounds?
- Do different treatment approaches result in distinct ratings of functional communication skills via the Aphasia Communication Outcome Measure (ACOM; Doyle et al., 2012) and an outcome measure of speech intelligibility using the Assessment of Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech (AIDS; Yorkston & Beukelman, 1981)?
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||10 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Crossover Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||Apraxia of Speech: A Comparison of EPG Treatment & Sound Production Treatment|
|Actual Study Start Date :||November 2, 2015|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||July 31, 2018|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||August 31, 2018|
Active Comparator: EPG Tx
An articulatory-kinematic treatment in conjunction with visual biofeedback specifically tongue to palate contact to improve speech production
Device: EPG Tx
behavioral intervention that incorporates a device that provides visual biofeedback
Other Name: Electropalatography Treatment, Palatometer Treatment
Active Comparator: Sound Production Treatment (SPT)
An articulatory-kinematic treatment that uses integral stimulation to improve speech production.
A treatment hierarchy involving integral stimulation
Other Name: Sound Production Treatment
- Change in Speech Production Accuracy for treated stimuli [ Time Frame: up to 32 weeks ]Percent accuracy in speech production for treated speech sounds directly receiving treatment
- Change in Speech Production Accuracy for untreated stimuli (related stimuli) [ Time Frame: up to 32 weeks ]Percent accuracy in speech production in related stimuli, but untreated stimuli comprised of treated speech sounds
- Change in maintenance of speech production accuracy for treated stimuli [ Time Frame: up to 32 weeks ]Percent accuracy in speech production for treated speech sounds following treatment
- Change in Functional Communication Skills [ Time Frame: up to 32 weeks ]Percent change on rating scale for functional communication skills by patient & spouse or family member
- Change in Speech Intelligibility [ Time Frame: up to 32 weeks ]Percentage of speech intelligibility on the word level by unfamiliar listeners
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02554513
|Contact: Shannon C Mauszycki, PhD||(801) 582-1565 ext firstname.lastname@example.org|
|United States, Utah|
|VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT||Recruiting|
|Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84148|
|Contact: Shannon C Mauszycki, PhD 801-582-1565 ext 2182 email@example.com|
|Principal Investigator: Shannon C Mauszycki, PhD|
|Principal Investigator:||Shannon C Mauszycki, PhD||VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT|