Don't get left behind! The modernized ClinicalTrials.gov is coming. Check it out now.
Say goodbye to ClinicalTrials.gov!
The new site is coming soon - go to the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Enhancing Working Memory in Patients With Early Alzheimer's Disease Through the Use of rTMS (rTMS-AD)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02537496
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : September 1, 2015
Last Update Posted : February 28, 2019
Sponsor:
Collaborators:
Brain & Behavior Research Foundation
University of Toronto
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Sanjeev Kumar, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Study Description
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information
Brief Summary:
In this study the investigators aim at assessing and then enhancing neuroplasticity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and working memory - a key function of DLPFC - in patients with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD). The investigators will use Paired Associative Stimulation (PAS) paradigm to measure neuroplasticity and then a 4-week course of high-frequency repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) to the DLPFC to enhance cognitive function. Clinical and cognitive assessments will be done at baseline, one week, one month and 6 months after the rTMS course. Healthy controls will also be enrolled to carry out baseline cognitive assessments and a baseline measurement of neuroplasticity.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Alzheimer's Disease Procedure: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Procedure: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - Sham Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

Specific aim 1: To assess working memory in participants with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and its change in response to a 4-week course of bilateral rTMS of DLPFC.

Hypothesis 1a: Compared to healthy individuals, participants with AD will be impaired on the N-back task.

Hypothesis 1b: Compared to sham rTMS, active rTMS will result in improvement on the N-back task in participants with AD at 1 week and 4 weeks after the treatment.

Specific aim 2: To assess DLPFC theta-gamma coupling during working memory performance in AD and its change in response to a 4-week course of bilateral rTMS of DLPFC.

Hypothesis 2a: Compared to healthy individuals, participants with AD will be impaired on DLPFC theta-gamma coupling during the N-back task.

Hypothesis 2b & 2c: Compared to sham rTMS, active rTMS will result in improvement in DLPFC theta-gamma coupling during the N-back task in participants with AD at 1 week and 4 weeks after the treatment.

Specific aim 3: To assess DLPFC neuroplasticity using PAS in participants with AD and its change in response to a 4-week course of bilateral rTMS.

Hypothesis 3a: Compared to healthy individuals, participants with AD will be impaired on PAS-induced neuroplasticity.

Hypothesis 3b: Compared to sham rTMS, active rTMS will result in improvement on PAS-induced neuroplasticity in participants with AD at 1 week and 4 weeks after the treatment.

Specific aim 4: To assess change in working memory, theta gamma coupling and DLPFC neuroplasticity at 6 months after the course of bilateral rTMS.

Hypothesis 4: Compared to sham rTMS, active rTMS group will perform better on measures of working memory, theta gamma coupling and PAS- induced DLPFC neuroplasticity 6 months after the course of rTMS.

Specific aim 5: To assess the change in general cognitive function at 4 weeks and 6 months after the course of bilateral rTMS.

Hypothesis 5: Compared to sham rTMS, active rTMS group will perform better on measures of general cognitive function at 4 weeks and 6 months after the course of rTMS.

Specific Aim 6: To assess insight in AD at baseline and any change in insight at 4 week and 6 month post rTMS follow up. H6: Participants with AD will have impaired insight into illness and cognitive function and they will experience improved insight at 4 week and 6 month follow up points.

Specific Aim 7: To validate a new scale for insight in AD , 'The Scale to Assess Anosognosia in Neurocognitive Disorders' (SAND) for its ability to assess insight at baseline and any change at 4 weeks and 6 month follow up points. H7: In participants with AD, SAND will be able to assess insight into illness and cognitive function at baseline, and will be able to detect change in insight at follow up points.

Study Design
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 36 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description: Participants will be assigned randomly to a 4-week repetitive course of either rTMS or control intervention (Sham rTMS) that is similar to rTMS but does not produce the same amount of brain stimulation.
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description: Active placebo coil will be used as a Sham condition. This coil effectively mimics the real stimulation producing somatic sensation and sound (contraction of scalp muscles) with minimal direct brain effects. Same stimulation parameters and site as active condition will be used.
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Enhancing Working Memory in Patients With Early Alzheimer's Disease Through the Enhancement of Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Neuroplasticity: A TMS-EEG Study
Actual Study Start Date : January 14, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date : October 10, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date : October 10, 2018

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Arms and Interventions
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Alzheimer's disease rTMS
The intervention procedure done in this group is repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
 Procedure: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Active treatment will be delivered at 90% resting motor threshold intensity. Stimulation will be administered at 20 Hz with 25 stimulation trains of 30 stimuli each with an inter-train interval of 30 sec. Treatment will be applied in sequential order bilaterally to the left and right DLPFC.
Other Name: rTMS
Sham Comparator: Alzheimer's disease rTMS Sham
The intervention procedure done in this group is Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - Sham
 Procedure: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - Sham
Same stimulation parameters and site as active condition will be used, but with placebo coil which will have minimal direct brain effects
Other Name: rTMS - Sham
No Intervention: Healthy Control
Healthy control group will only participate in baseline assessments which include baseline neuropsychological testing and baseline measurement of neuroplasticity. This will be used to standardize neuropsychological test scores and to compare the baseline neuroplasticity between healthy participants and Alzheimer's disease (AD) participants. Healthy control group will not get rTMS intervention.


Outcome Measures
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Change in N-back Task Performance [ Time Frame: pre-intervention (baseline) and then 7 days, 4 weeks and 6 months after intervention ]

    The N-Back is a working memory task where the subject is presented with a sequence of stimuli (letters).

    The task consists of indicating when the current stimulus matches the one from N steps earlier in the sequence. By measuring the accuracy on the N-back task, the investigators will assess the working memory at baseline and compare the change at 7days, 4 weeks and 6 months post-intervention.

    The investigators' pilot data suggests that this test is most discriminatory between AD participants and healthy controls. The N-back task will be administered while recording EEG online to assess theta-gamma coupling.



Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Changes in Theta Phase-Gamma Amplitude Coupling [ Time Frame: Change from baseline at 7 days, 4 weeks and 6 months after intervention. ]
    Theta gamma coupling may serve as a surrogate marker of neuroplasticity and underlie working memory performance. From EEG recordings, the investigators will assess the changes in this marker from baseline at 7 days, 4 weeks and 6 months after intervention.

  2. Changes in DLPFC Neuroplasticity [ Time Frame: Change from baseline at 7 days, 4 weeks and 6 months after intervention. ]

    The investigators will use a previously established protocol to administer PAS to assess DLPFC neuroplasticity at baseline and compare the changes at 7 days, 4 weeks and 6 months after intervention.

    It involves stimulation on median nerve at wrist followed by TMS of DLPFC after 25 ms delay. PAS-induced neuroplasticity will be measured as the change in TMS-induced cortical evoked activity in response to PAS and as captured with EEG.


  3. Changes in Cognitive Function Measures Scores [ Time Frame: Change from baseline at 7 days, 4 weeks and 6 months after intervention. ]

    The investigators will use an array of neuropsychological (NP) tests to measure the general cognitive functions at baseline and the change from baseline at 7 days, 4 weeks and 6 months after intervention.

    The NP tests include: Executive Interview (EXIT25), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) and Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB).


  4. Validating a new scale for insight in Alzheimer's disease. [ Time Frame: Change from baseline at 7 days and 6 months after intervention. ]
    The Scale to Assess Anosognosia in Neurocognitive Disorders' (SAND) is a new scale to assess insight in patients with Alzheimer's disease. It measures the core dimensions of clinical insight into AD, including general illness awareness, symptom attribution, awareness of need for treatment, and awareness of negative consequences attributable to the illness.


Eligibility Criteria
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   55 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria for AD participants:

  1. Age 55 years or above.
  2. Ability to understand and speak English.
  3. Confirmed Diagnosis of Probable AD by NIA-AA criteria.
  4. Either not taking Cognitive enhancers or taking them at a stable dose for the last 3 months.
  5. Willingness and ability to provide informed consent or an ability to assent and availability of a substitute decision maker willing to provide consent on participant's behalf.
  6. Corrected visual acuity enough to read newspaper headlines.
  7. Ability to hear a raised conversational voice, with hearing aids if needed.

Inclusion criteria for healthy control participants:

  1. Age 55 or above.
  2. Willingness and ability to speak English.
  3. Willingness and ability to provide informed consent.
  4. Corrected visual acuity enough to read newspaper headlines.
  5. Ability to hear a raised conversational voice, with hearing aids if needed.

Exclusion Criteria for AD participants:

  1. MOCA score < 10.
  2. DSM IV - TR diagnosis of a current episode of mood disorder in the last 3 months.
  3. DSM IV - TR diagnosis of a current anxiety disorder in the last 3 months.
  4. DSM IV - TR diagnosis of a current substance use disorder in the last 3 months.
  5. DSM IV - TR diagnosis of a current or lifetime primary psychotic disorder.
  6. Diagnosis of intellectual disability or a neurodevelopmental disorder.
  7. Electroconvulsive Therapy treatment in the last 6 months.
  8. History of a seizure other than a febrile seizure in infancy.
  9. Currently taking Anticonvulsants or Benzodiazepines.
  10. Any contraindication for TMS or any other medical condition/circumstances that would make the study participation difficult for the participant.

Exclusion criteria for healthy control participants:

  1. Meets criteria for a DSM IV - TR diagnosis other than simple phobias or Adjustment disorder.
  2. Any other neurological disorder affecting central nervous system.
  3. Psychotropic medication except for sedative /hypnotics at a stable dose for at least 4 weeks.
  4. History of seizure other than a febrile seizure in infancy
  5. Currently taking Anticonvulsants or Benzodiazepines.
  6. Any contraindication for TMS or any other medical condition/circumstances that would make the study participation difficult for the participant.
Contacts and Locations
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02537496


Locations
Layout table for location information
Canada, Ontario
Center for Addiction and Mental Health
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M6J 1H1
Sponsors and Collaborators
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Brain & Behavior Research Foundation
University of Toronto
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Sanjeev Kumar, MD, FRCPC Center for Addiction and Mental Health
More Information
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information
Additional Information:

Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Sanjeev Kumar, Sanjeev Kumar, MD, FRCPC, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02537496    
Other Study ID Numbers: 005/2015
First Posted: September 1, 2015    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: February 28, 2019
Last Verified: February 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No
Keywords provided by Sanjeev Kumar, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health:
Alzheimer's Disease
Brain stimulation
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Neuroplasticity
 cognitive enhancement
TMS-EEG
rTMS
PAS
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease
Dementia
Brain Diseases
Central Nervous System Diseases
Nervous System Diseases
 Tauopathies
Neurodegenerative Diseases
Neurocognitive Disorders
Mental Disorders