Working...
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Evaluation of Conventional Ablation With or Without Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation to Eliminate Human AF (RECONFIRM)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02456233
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : May 28, 2015
Last Update Posted : April 25, 2018
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Sanjiv Narayan, MD, PhD, Stanford University

Brief Summary:
This prospective randomized study will assess the safety and efficacy of FIRM-guided ablation (FIRM+PVI) compared to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) without FIRM, for the treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Atrial Fibrillation Procedure: Conventional AF Ablation with PVI Procedure: FIRM-guided ablation plus PVI Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects over 2 millions Americans. AF may reduce cardiac performance and may result in thrombus formation in the left atrium and thromboembolic events, such as stroke. Ablation to eliminate the causes of this arrhythmia is increasingly performed since pharmacological therapy is suboptimal. Ablation currently targets triggers, by ablating left atrial areas outside the pulmonary veins (pulmonary vein isolation, PVI) in subjects with symptomatic AF who have failed drugs. Unfortunately, this has mixed success with the best outcomes being 50-70% freedom from AF at 1 year post ablation.

A major issue with AF therapy is the lack of knowledge about critical regions of the heart that cause and sustain AF. A recent trial (STAR-AF2) showed that ablating regions empirically - i.e. without defining their role in AF(lines or fractionated electrograms) - did not improve patient outcomes compared to PVI alone (Verma et al, NEJM 2015). However, this leaves us with PVI that had a 50% success rate in that trial and in several other trials even for paroxysmal AF.

We hypothesize that guiding ablation to critical arrhythmia-targeting zones will improve success over PVI alone. Specifically, we hypothesize that computational mapping of AF will find small regions called rotors and focal sources and ablate them, called Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation (FIRM) ablation, shows promise at eliminating AF substrates. In many single center trials, FIRM improves results from PVI alone. This will be among the first randomized comparisons of FIRM ablation compared to PVI alone, and addresses an important question in the field.


Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 120 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Randomized Evaluation of Conventional Ablation With or Without Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation to Eliminate Human Atrial Fibrillation (RECONFIRM): A Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Start Date : April 2016
Estimated Primary Completion Date : July 2019
Estimated Study Completion Date : July 2020

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Arm Intervention/treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional AF Ablation with PVI
These patients will be treated by conventional AF ablation by pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone.
Procedure: Conventional AF Ablation with PVI
Trigger Based Ablation for AF, using Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) alone

Experimental: FIRM-guided ablation plus PVI
These patients will be treated by ablation of patient-specific rotors and focal sources (FIRM). Conventional ablation (PVI) will then be performed as part of the standard of care procedure.
Procedure: FIRM-guided ablation plus PVI
Substrate ablation for AF, via ablation of rotors and focal sources. Conventional (PVI) ablation will also be performed.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Long term success [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
    Freedom from atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence during the 12 months after the initial AF ablation procedure, after an initial 3 month blanking (healing and stabilization) period.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Long-term freedom from AF/AT [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
    Freedom from AF and atrial tachycardia (AT) during the 12 months after the initial AF ablation procedure, after an initial 3 month blanking (healing and stabilization) period. Atrial tachycardias (AT) include those arising from atrial regions where ablation was performed (such as left atrial tachycardia) as well as from regions where ablation was not performed (such as typical cavotricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter).

  2. Total ablation time [ Time Frame: 1 day ]
    Total ablation time will be recorded in all patients, measured as the cumulative application of energy from the first ablation lesion to the last lesion. These values will be compared between the FIRM-guided and conventional ablation groups. If ablation for AT/atrial flutter is pursued, this ablation time will be documented separately.

  3. Quality of Life [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
    Quantitative EuroQol EQ5D scores post-ablation will be compared to those pre-ablation at all time points separately and together (ANOVA)

  4. Adverse Events [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
    Adverse events will be adjudicated by an independent Data and Safety Monitoring Committee, who will determine whether they are or are not related to the procedure. The number and type of adverse events will be compared between FIRM-guided and conventional ablation groups.

  5. Healthcare Utilization [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
    Hospitalization, other procedures and healthcare utilization, adjudicated by an independent Data and Safety Monitoring Committee, will be compared between limbs.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   22 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age >21 years
  2. Reported incidence of at least two documented episodes of symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) during the 3 months preceding trial entry (at least one episode documented by 12-lead ECG or ECG rhythm strip). Ideally, patients will have implanted continuous ECG recorders in place for >30 days prior to the procedure to document AF episodes and percentage of time in AF ("burden") prior to ablation
  3. Male -or- Women without childbearing potential (surgically sterile or have been without a period for 12 months), -or- Women of childbearing potential who are not pregnant per a serum HCG lab test
  4. Refractory to at least one Class I or III anti-arrhythmic medications. Drug doses must be therapeutic and stable
  5. Willingness, ability and commitment to participate in baseline and follow-up evaluations without participation in another clinical trial (unless documented approval received from both sponsors)
  6. Oral anticoagulation required for those subjects who have a score of two or more based on the following criteria (CHA2DS2VASc)

    • congestive heart failure (1 point)
    • hypertension (1 point)
    • age 75 years or older (2 points)
    • diabetes (1 point)
    • prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (2 points)
    • vascular disease (including coronary artery disease, CAD) (1 point)
    • age 65 years or older (1 point)
    • gender category: female (1 point) Pre-procedural anticoagulation will ideally have been continuous for 3 or more weeks prior to the procedure, as clinically indicated, with INR > 2 in patients taking warfarin.
  7. Patient is willing and able to remain on anti-coagulation therapy for a minimum of 3 months post procedure for all subjects, and potentially indefinitely post procedure if the patient has CHA2DS2VASc score >or= 2
  8. Signed, informed consent after a full discussion of the risks and benefits of both therapy arms, and the concept of randomization
  9. NYHA Class 0, I or II and stable on medical therapy for > 3 months
  10. Left atrial diameter <or= 5.5cm (CT or MRI preprocedure, or intracardiac echocardiography, with documented image of largest dimension)
  11. LVEF >or= 40%
  12. Sustained AF during procedure: If the patient does not experience spontaneous sustained AF (>10 min) during the procedure, typically in paroxysmal AF patients, sustained AF will be induced in routine fashion by burst pacing initially from the coronary sinus, then from other sites, then with isoproterenol infusion. Using intensive AF induction methods (Narayan, J Cardiovasc EP; 2012; 23(5): 447-454) sustained AF is induced in > 90% of paroxysmal AF patients presenting in sinus rhythm. If AF cannot be sustained, the patient does not meet the inclusion criteria for the protocol and the patient will undergo AF ablation per physician direction.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Reversible Cause of Atrial Fibrillation: Atrial fibrillation from a reversible cause (e.g., surgery, hyperthyroidism, pericarditis); Cardiac or thoracic surgery (e.g., valve repair or coronary artery bypass grafting, CABG) within the last 180 days; AF secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease
  2. Anti-Coagulation Contraindicated: Contraindication to Heparin; Contraindication to Warfarin or other novel oral anticoagulants (e.g., dabigatran, rivaroxabanm apixaban); History of significant bleeding abnormalities
  3. Clotting Diathesis: History of significant blood clotting abnormalities, systemic thrombi or systemic embolization
  4. Cardiac Prosthesis: ASD closure device, LAA closure device, prosthetic mitral or tricuspid valve
  5. Thrombus or Mass: Atrial clot/thrombus on imaging such as on a trans-esophageal echocardiogram (TEE) within 72 hours of the procedure; Intramural thrombus or other cardiac mass that may adversely affect catheter introduction or manipulation; Significant pulmonary embolus within 6 months of enrollment
  6. Acute illness or active systemic infection or sepsis that may ordinarily warrant postponement of the procedure
  7. History of recent cerebrovascular disease (stroke or TIA) or systemic thromboembolism within < 6 months
  8. Severe Heart Failure: NYHA classes III, IV; Heart failure that is not stable on medical therapy; Pulmonary edema that may make planned anesthesia or sedation difficult
  9. Non-Stable Coronary Disease: Stable/unstable angina or ongoing myocardial ischemia; Myocardial infarction (MI) within the past 3 months
  10. Structural heart disease of clinical significance including:

    • Congenital heart disease where the abnormality or its correction prohibit or increase the risk of ablation
    • Acquired heart disease that may increase the risk of ablation, such as significant ventricular septal defect post myocardial infarction
    • Rheumatic valve disease, since this produces a unique AF phenotype
    • Extreme left atrial enlargement, defined as LA volume index > 60 ml/m2, in whom PVI has low success and 55 mm baskets are too small for the atria
  11. Planned Cardiac Surgery: If cardiac transplantation or other cardiac surgery are planned within the 12 months follow period of the trial
  12. Life expectancy less than 12 months (the followup period of the trial)
  13. Significant pulmonary disease (e.g., COPD) or any other disease that significantly increase risk to the patient from sedation or anesthesia
  14. Untreatable allergy to contrast media
  15. Electrolyte imbalance: At the time of the ablation procedure, clinically significant abnormalities in serum potassium, sodium, magnesium or other electrolytes that affect the suitability of the patient for ablation at that time

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02456233


Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: Sanjiv Narayan, MD, PhD (650) 723-9363 kmills2@stanford.edu
Contact: Kathleen Mills, BA (650) 723-9363 kmills2@stanford.edu

Locations
Layout table for location information
United States, California
Veterans Affairs Medical Center Not yet recruiting
San Diego, California, United States, 92161
Contact: David E Krummen, MD       dkrummen@ucsd.edu   
Principal Investigator: David E Krummen, MD         
Stanford University Recruiting
Stanford, California, United States, 94305
Contact: Gerri O'Riordan, RN    650-725-5597    GORiordan@stanfordhealthcare.org   
Sponsors and Collaborators
Stanford University
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Sanjiv Narayan, MD, PhD Stanford University

Publications:
Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, Brugada J, Camm AJ, Chen SA, Crijns HJ, Damiano RJ Jr, Davies DW, DiMarco J, Edgerton J, Ellenbogen K, Ezekowitz MD, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Hindricks G, Iesaka Y, Jackman W, Jalife J, Jais P, Kalman J, Keane D, Kim YH, Kirchhof P, Klein G, Kottkamp H, Kumagai K, Lindsay BD, Mansour M, Marchlinski FE, McCarthy PM, Mont JL, Morady F, Nademanee K, Nakagawa H, Natale A, Nattel S, Packer DL, Pappone C, Prystowsky E, Raviele A, Reddy V, Ruskin JN, Shemin RJ, Tsao HM, Wilber D; Heart Rhythm Society Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design: a report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS); and in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Endorsed by the governing bodies of the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the American Heart Association, the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Heart Rhythm Society. Heart Rhythm. 2012 Apr;9(4):632-696.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.12.016. Epub 2012 Mar 1.

Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Sanjiv Narayan, MD, PhD, Professor of Medicine, Director of AF Program and EP Research, Stanford University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02456233     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: RECONFIRM2015
First Posted: May 28, 2015    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: April 25, 2018
Last Verified: April 2018

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No

Keywords provided by Sanjiv Narayan, MD, PhD, Stanford University:
rotor
FIRM
paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
persistent atrial fibrillation
atrial tachyarrhythmia
ablation
contact mapping
clinical trial
signal processing

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Atrial Fibrillation
Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Heart Diseases
Cardiovascular Diseases
Pathologic Processes