We updated the design of this site on September 25th. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu
Trial record 1 of 2 for:    coolief
Previous Study | Return to List | Next Study

Nerve Ablation by Cooled Radiofrequency Compared to Corticosteroid Injection for Management of Knee Pain

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02343003
First Posted: January 21, 2015
Last Update Posted: October 9, 2017
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Halyard Health
  Purpose

This study is designed to:

  • Determine the effectiveness (primarily measured by pain relief) of Coolief when used to create radiofrequency lesions of the genicular nerves compared to pain relief following corticosteroid injection; and
  • Confirm the safety of Coolief when used to perform radiofrequency lesions of the genicular nerves in subjects to manage knee pain compared to safety of corticosteroid injection

Condition Intervention
Osteoarthritis of the Knee Device: Cooled Radiofrequency Drug: Corticosteroid injection

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Prospective, Multi-Center, RCT Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of Coolief™ Cooled Radiofrequency Probe to Create Lesions of the Genicular Nerves and Comparing Corticosteroid Injection in the Management of Knee Pain

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by Halyard Health:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) [ Time Frame: 6 months ]
    The number of subjects whose knee pain is reduced by ≥ 50% based on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals "no pain" and 10 points equals the "worst pain".

  • Safety: Number of Subjects Experiencing Adverse Events Through Final Follow up. [ Time Frame: 6 months and 12 months ]
    Safety Endpoint: Number of subjects experiencing adverse events through final follow up.


Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Numeric Rating Scale [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
    The number of subjects whose knee pain is reduced from baseline by ≥ 50% based on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 12 months. The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals "no pain" and 10 points equals the "worst pain".

  • Oxford Knee Score [ Time Frame: 6 months and 12 months ]
    Improvement in global outcome from baseline as measured by the Oxford Knee Score at 6 months and 12 months. The Oxford Knee Score is determined by a 12-question survey that measures knee function, and is scored on a scale that ranges from 0 - 48 points, with scores of 0 - 19 = "severe arthritis", 20 - 29 = "moderate to severe arthritis", 30 - 39 = "mild to moderate arthritis", and 40 - 48 = "satisfactory joint function".


Other Outcome Measures:
  • Subject Satisfaction - Number of Participants With a Global Perceived Effect Score of 5 or Greater [ Time Frame: 6 months and 12 months ]
    Subject satisfaction as measured by the Global Perceived Effect Score at 6 months and 12 months. The study subjects' perception of treatment effect was reflected by the Global Perceived Effect (GPE). The Global Perceived Effect is a 7-point scale: 1 point = "worst ever", 2 points = "much worse", 3 points = "worse", 4 points = "not improved but not worse", 5 points = "improved", 6 points = "much improved", 7 points = "best ever".

  • Medication Usage [ Time Frame: 6 months and 12 months ]
    Reduction in pain medication usage from baseline as measured by subject self-reported average daily dosage.


Enrollment: 151
Actual Study Start Date: January 2015
Study Completion Date: March 16, 2017
Primary Completion Date: August 2016 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Experimental: Cooled radiofrequency
Cooled radiofrequency energy will be delivered to study subjects' knees to ablate culprit sensory nerves and reduce knee pain
Device: Cooled Radiofrequency
Delivery of energy to ablate sensory nerves via cooled radiofrequency probe
Other Name: Coolief
Active Comparator: Corticosteroid injection
Corticosteroid injections will be administered to study subjects' knees to reduce knee pain
Drug: Corticosteroid injection
Delivery of corticosteroid into knee by injection with needle to reduce knee pain

Detailed Description:

This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter comparison study examining the outcomes of subjects having knee pain undergoing a procedure to create a radiofrequency lesion of the genicular nerves with the Coolief system compared to subjects receiving corticosteroid injection. A total of approximately 144 subjects will be enrolled into this study with subjects undergoing either radiofrequency neurotomy or corticosteroid injection in a 1:1 randomization scheme. Follow up will be conducted for a total of 12 months post Coolief procedure with the primary endpoint being completed at month 6. Subjects randomized to the comparison (corticosteroid) group will have the option to cross over to the neurotomy group after completing the 6 month endpoint assessment. They would then be followed for an additional 6 months. Pain, overall outcome, quality of life, pain medication use, and adverse events will be compared between the two treatment groups in order to determine success.

Primary Effectiveness Endpoint:

The proportion of subjects whose knee pain is reduced by ≥ 50% based on the NRS scale at 6 Months.

Primary Safety Endpoint:

The proportion of subjects experiencing adverse events through final follow up.

Secondary Effectiveness Endpoints:

  • The proportion of subjects whose knee pain is reduced from baseline by ≥ 50% based on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 12 months.
  • Improvement in global outcome from baseline as measured by the Oxford Knee Score at 6 months and 12 months.

Tertiary Effectiveness Endpoint:

Subject satisfaction as measured by the Global Perceived Effect Score at 6 months and 12 months.

Quaternary Effectiveness Endpoint:

Reduction in pain medication usage from baseline as measured by subject self-reported average daily dosage.

In addition, exploratory analyses of health economic indicators may be performed.

Subjects will participate in the study for up to 13 months (2 week roll-in period + treatment visit + 12 month follow up), except for subjects who participate in the optional crossover group. These crossover subjects will be on study for up to 15 months (2 week roll-in + treatment + 6 month follow-up and crossover + 6 month follow up). Enrollment is anticipated to take approximately 6-8 months.

  Eligibility

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Ages Eligible for Study:   21 Years and older   (Adult, Senior)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

INCLUSION CRITERIA

  1. Age ≥ 21 years
  2. Able to understand the informed consent form and provide written informed consent and able to complete outcome measures
  3. History of chronic knee pain for longer than 6 months unresponsive to conservative treatments (PT, oral analgesics, intra-articular injections with steroids and/or viscosupplementation)
  4. Positive response (defined as a decrease in numeric pain scores of at least 50%) to a geniculate nerve block of the index knee
  5. Pain on NRS ≥ 6 on a 10 point scale for the index knee
  6. Radiologic confirmation of osteoarthritis (x-ray/MRI/CT) of OA grade of 2 (mild), 3 (moderate) or 4 (severe) noted within 12 months for the index knee
  7. Oxford Knee Score group at Baseline of ≤ 35 indicating moderate to severe OA in the index knee
  8. If the patient is taking an opioid or other morphine equivalent medication, the dose must be considered clinically stable (defined as <10% change in dosage for ≥ 2 months prior to the screening visit).
  9. Analgesics including membrane stabilizers such as Neurontin and antidepressants for pain such as Cymbalta must be clinically stable (defined as stable dosage for ≥ 6 weeks prior to the screening visit) and shall not change during the course of the study without approval of investigator. Agree to see one pain doctor (study investigator) for knee pain during the study period
  10. Index knee pathology that is consistent with generally accepted indications for total knee arthroplasty.
  11. Willing to delay any surgical intervention for the index knee for 12 months.
  12. Willingness to provide informed consent and to comply with the requirements of this protocol for the full duration.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

  1. Pseudo arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or other systemic inflammatory arthritis condition that could cause knee pain.
  2. Previous or pending lower limb amputation.
  3. Intra-articular steroid, platelet rich plasma (PRP) or hyaluronic acid injections in the index knee within 90 days from the screening visit.
  4. An intra-articular corticosteroid injection is not indicated as an appropriate treatment option.
  5. Prior radiofrequency of the genicular nerves of the index knee.
  6. Prior partial, resurfacing, or total knee arthroplasty in index knee.
  7. Clinically significant ligamentous laxity of the index knee.
  8. Evidence of structural abnormality other than osteoarthritis of knee, hip or back that materially affects gait or function of the knee or is the underlying cause of the knee pain.
  9. BMI > 40.
  10. Extremely thin patients and those with minimal subcutaneous tissue thickness that would not accommodate a lesion of up to 14 mm in diameter to limit the risk of skin burns.
  11. Pending or active compensation claim, litigation or disability remuneration (secondary gain) related to knee.
  12. Pregnant or intent of becoming pregnant during the study period.
  13. Chronic pain associated with significant psychosocial dysfunction.
  14. Beck's Depression Index score of > 22 (indicates clinically depressed state).
  15. Allergies to any of the medications to be used during the procedure.
  16. Systemic or localized infection at needle entry sites (subject may be considered for inclusion once infection is resolved).
  17. History of uncontrolled coagulopathy, ongoing coagulation treatment or unexplained or uncontrollable bleeding that is uncorrectable.
  18. Identifiable anatomical variability that would materially alter the procedure as described in the protocol.
  19. Within the preceding 2 years, subject has suffered from active narcotic addiction, substance or alcohol abuse.
  20. Current prescribed opioid medications equivalent to greater than 60 morphine equivalent daily opioid dose.
  21. Uncontrolled immunosuppression (e.g. AIDS, cancer, diabetes, etc.)
  22. Subject currently implanted with pacemaker or defibrillator.
  23. Participating in another clinical trial/investigation within 30 days prior to signing informed consent.
  24. Subject unwilling or unable to comply with follow up schedule or protocol requirements.
  Contacts and Locations
Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02343003


Locations
United States, Arizona
Valley Anesthesiology Consultants - Estrella
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85037
Valley Anesthesiology Consultants/Valley Pain Consultants
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85254
United States, California
Orthopedic Pain Specialists
Santa Monica, California, United States, 90403
United States, Illinois
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
United States, Minnesota
MAPS Applied Research Center, Inc.
Maple Grove, Minnesota, United States, 55369
United States, New York
Ainsworth Institute of Pain Management
New York, New York, United States, 10022
United States, North Carolina
Center for Clinical Research
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103
United States, Pennsylvania
Drexel University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
United States, South Carolina
Piedmont Comprehensive Pain Management
Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29622
United States, Virginia
Virginia iSpine Physicians
Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23235
United States, Wisconsin
Advanced Pain Management
Greenfield, Wisconsin, United States, 53221
Sponsors and Collaborators
Halyard Health
Investigators
Study Director: David T Curd, MS Halyard Health, Inc.
  More Information

Responsible Party: Halyard Health
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02343003     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 105-14-0001
First Submitted: January 15, 2015
First Posted: January 21, 2015
Results First Submitted: August 8, 2017
Results First Posted: October 9, 2017
Last Update Posted: October 9, 2017
Last Verified: February 2017

Keywords provided by Halyard Health:
cooled radiofrequency ablation
knee pain
osteoarthritis
pain management

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Arthritis
Joint Diseases
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Rheumatic Diseases