ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Investigating the Effect of Vortioxetine in Adult ADHD Patients

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02327013
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : December 30, 2014
Results First Posted : January 31, 2018
Last Update Posted : March 7, 2018
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
H. Lundbeck A/S

Brief Summary:
The purpose is to determine the effect of vortioxetine treatment on ADHD symptoms in adult patients with ADHD in a 12 weeks study.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Drug: vortioxetine 10 mg tablet Drug: vortioxetine 20 mg tablet Other: Placebo tablet Phase 2

Detailed Description:

The study employed the Sequential Parallel Comparison Design (SPCD), a clinical study design which intend to increase signal detection by using two stages of treatment:

  • Stage 1 - first 6 weeks of the 12-weeks treatment period (Visit 2/Baseline 1 to Visit 5/Week 6)
  • Stage 2 - last 6 weeks of the 12-weeks treatment period (Visit 5/Baseline 2 to Visit 8/Week 12)

In Stage 1, patients were randomized to placebo or vortioxetine 10 or 20mg. Patients on vortioxetine 10 or 20mg/day during Stage 1 remained on the same treatment in Stage 2. Responders to placebo in Stage 1 remained on Placebo in Stage 2. Patients who were placebo non-responders during Stage 1, defined as patients with a <30% reduction in AISRS total score from Baseline 1, were re-randomized to placebo or vortioxetine 10 or 20mg/day in Stage 2.


Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 227 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Interventional, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Fixed-dose Study of Vortioxetine in Adults With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
Study Start Date : December 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date : September 2016
Actual Study Completion Date : September 2016

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: vortioxetine 10 mg tablet

In Stage 1, patients will receive vortioxetine 10mg/day for 6 weeks.

In Stage 2, patients who received vortioxetine 10mg/day in Stage 1 will continue on the same treatment for additionally 6 weeks. Placebo non-responders will be re-randomized to placebo, or vortioxetine 10 or 20mg/day for additionally 6 weeks.

Drug: vortioxetine 10 mg tablet
Oral tablets, once daily
Other Names:
  • Brintellix®
  • Lu AA21004
  • Trintellix®

Experimental: vortioxetine 20 mg tablet

In Stage 1, patients will receive vortioxetine 20mg/day for 6 weeks.

In Stage 2, patients who received vortioxetine 20mg/day in Stage 1 will continue on the same treatment for additionally 6 weeks. Placebo non-responders will be re-randomized to placebo, or vortioxetine 10 or 20mg/day for additionally 6 weeks.

Drug: vortioxetine 20 mg tablet
Oral tablets, once daily
Other Names:
  • Brintellix®
  • Lu AA21004
  • Trintellix®

Placebo Comparator: Placebo tablet

In Stage 1, the patients will receive placebo for 6 weeks.

In Stage 2, placebo responders will continue on placebo for additionally 6 weeks. Placebo non-responders will be re-randomized to placebo, or vortioxetine 10 or 20mg/day for additionally 6 weeks.

Other: Placebo tablet
Oral tablets, once daily




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Change in ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) Total Score [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    AISRS: an 18-item scale administered by the investigator. It included 9 items that evaluated symptoms of inattention and 9 items that evaluated symptoms of impulsivity and hyperactivity. Each item was rated from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). AISRS total score was calculated as sum of all the items on the scale and ranged from 0 to 54. A higher score corresponded to a worse severity of ADHD.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Inattention/Meta-cognition: Change in Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Using Metacognition Index [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The Metacognition Index (MI) is an index score of the BRIEF-A consisting of 5 scales: initiate, working memory, plan/organise, task monitor, and organization of materials. Each item is rated on a 3-point scale with the numeric score of 1 to 3. Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.

  2. Cognitive Function/Global Executive Function: Change in BRIEF-A Using the Global Executive Composite Score [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    BRIEF-A is a validated questionnaire composed of 75-item within nine non-overlapping scales: 4 scales in the Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI) (inhibit, shift, emotional control, and self-monitor), and 5 scales in the Metacognition Index (MI) (initiate, working memory, plan/organise, task monitor, and organization of materials). Each item is rated on a 3-point scale with the numeric score of 1 to 3. The BRIEF-A yields an overall score (Global Executive Composite) composed of two index scores, the MI and the BRI. Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.

  3. Overall Functioning: Change in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The SDS comprises a series of patient rated scales designed to measure impairment. The patient rates the extent to which his or her (1) work, (2) social life or leisure activities and 3) home life or family responsibilities are impaired on a 10-point visual analogue scale, on which 0 = normal functioning and 10 = severe functional impairment. The number of days lost and the number of underproductive days last from work/school due to symptoms are also captured. The total score is calculated as a sum of the 3 visual analogue scales, ranges from 0 to 30. A higher score represents more severe functional impairment. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.

  4. Productivity: Change in Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Productivity Loss Score [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The WLQ is a patient self-rated scale designed to assess on-the-job impact of chronic health problems and/or treatment. The WLQ consists of 25 items in 4 dimensions: limitations handling time (5 items), physical work demands (6 items), mental-interpersonal work demands (9 items), and output demands (5 items). Each item is rated on a 5-point scale from "All of the Time" (score 5) to "None of the Time" (score 0), or "Does Not Apply to My Job". The WLQ Productivity Loss Score is derived from the Global Productivity Index, which is calculated as a weighed sum of the 4 dimensions. Reduction in WLQ Productivity Loss score indicates less work limitation and represents the estimated percentage of productivity loss in the past two weeks due to presenteeism relative to a healthy benchmark sample. WLQ Productivity Loss Score ranges from 0% to 24,9%.

  5. Change in AISRS Inattention Sub-score [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The AISRS inattentive subscale score consists of 9 items from the AISRS which address inattention. Each item is rated from 0 to 3. The AISRS inattentive subscale score can range from 0 to 27. A higher score corresponds to a worse severity of ADHD inattentiveness.

  6. Change AISRS Hyperactivity/Impulsivity Sub-score [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The AISRS hyperactive/impulsive subscale score consists of 9 items from the AISRS which address hyperactivity and impulsivity. Each item is rated from 0 to 3. The AISRS hyperactive/impulsive subscale score can range from 0 to 27. A higher score corresponds to a worse severity of ADHD hyperactivity/impulsivity.

  7. Percentage of Patients Responding (Response Defined as 30% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in AISRS Total Score) [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    AISRS: an 18-item scale administered by the investigator. It included 9 items that evaluated symptoms of inattention and 9 items that evaluated symptoms of impulsivity and hyperactivity. Each item was rated from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). AISRS total score was calculated as sum of all the items on the scale and ranged from 0 to 54. A higher score corresponded to a worse severity of ADHD.

  8. Change in Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) Total Score [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) is a patient-rated scale designed to assess the ADHD symptoms in adults based on the diagnostic criteria of DSM-IVTM. The ASRS consist of 18 items, each rated on a 5-point scale from "Never" to "Very Often". The categories "Never" and "Rarely" were combined when calculating the total score to mirror the scoring of the AISRS, with 0 representing "Never"/"Rarely" and 3 representing "Very Often". The Total Score ranges from 0 to 54. A reduction in score indicates less severity of ADHD.

  9. Change in Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) provides the clinician's impression of the patient's current state of mental illness. The clinician uses his or her clinical experience of this patient population to rate the severity of the patient's current mental illness on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (Normal - not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). Higher scores indicate worsening.

  10. Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-I) Score [ Time Frame: Week 6 ]
    The Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-I) provides the clinician's impression of the patient's improvement (or worsening). The clinician assesses the patient's condition relative to a baseline on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Higher scores indicate worsening.

  11. Response (Defined as a CGI-I Score of 1 or 2), Stage 1 [ Time Frame: Week 6 ]
    The Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-I) provides the clinician's impression of the patient's improvement (or worsening). The clinician assesses the patient's condition relative to a baseline on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Higher scores indicate worsening.

  12. Change in BRIEF-A Using the Behavioural Regulation Index [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI) is an index score of the BRIEF-A and consists of 4 scales: inhibit, shift, emotional control, and self-monitor). Each item is rated on a 3-point scale with the numeric score of 1 to 3. Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.

  13. Change in BRIEF-A Subscales - Inhibit [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The BRIEF-A subscale Inhibit is a subscale within the Behavioural Regulation Index (BRI). Each item is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (often). Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.

  14. Change BRIEF-A Subscales - Initiate [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The BRIEF-A subscale Initiate is a subscale within the Behavioural Regulation Index (BRI). Each item is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (often). Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.

  15. Change in BRIEF-A Subscales - Organization of Materials [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The BRIEF-A subscale Organization of Materials is a subscale within the Behavioural Regulation Index (BRI). Each item is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (often). Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.

  16. Change in BRIEF-A Subscales - Planning/Organize [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The BRIEF-A subscale Planning/Organize is a subscale within the Behavioural Regulation Index (BRI). Each item is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (often). Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.

  17. Change in BRIEF-A Subscales - Shift [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The BRIEF-A subscale Shift is a subscale within the Behavioural Regulation Index (BRI). Each item is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (often). Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.

  18. Change in BRIEF-A Subscales - Self Monitor [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The BRIEF-A subscale Self Monitor is a subscale within the Behavioural Regulation Index (BRI). Each item is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (often). Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.

  19. Change in BRIEF-A Subscales - Task Monitor [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The BRIEF-A subscale Task Monitor is a subscale within the Behavioural Regulation Index (BRI). Each item is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (often). Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.

  20. Change in BRIEF-A Subscales - Working Memory [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The BRIEF-A subscale Working Memory is a subscale within the Behavioural Regulation Index (BRI). Each item is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (often). Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.

  21. Change in BRIEF-A Subscales - Emotional Control [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The BRIEF-A subscale Emotional Control is a subscale within the Behavioural Regulation Index (BRI). Each item is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (often). Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.

  22. Change in Perceived Deficits Questionnaire - Depression (PDQ-D) Total Score [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The PDQ-D is a patient-rated scale designed to assess cognitive impairment/dysfunction adapted for MDD. Each item is rated on a scale from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). The total score of the 20 items ranges from 0 to 80 with higher scores reflect greater subjective cognitive impairment. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.

  23. Change in PDQ-D Subscales - Attention and Concentration Sub-score [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The PDQ-D attention/concentration sub-score consists of items 1, 5, 9, 13, and 17 of the PDQ with a score ranging from 0 to 20. A higher score reflects greater subjective cognitive impairment. A reduction in score indicates less cognitive impairment.

  24. Change in PDQ-D Sub-scales - Retrospective Memory Sub-score [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The PDQ-D retrospective memory sub-score consists of items 2, 6, 10, 14, and 18 of the PDQ (see Outcome 23) with a score ranging from 0 to 20. A higher score reflects greater subjective cognitive impairment. A reduction in score indicates less cognitive impairment.

  25. Change in PDQ-D Sub-scales - Prospective Memory Sub-score [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The PDQ-D prospective memory sub-score consists of items 3, 7, 11, 15, and 19 of the PDQ (see Outcome 23) with a score ranging from 0 to 20. A higher score reflects greater subjective cognitive impairment. A reduction in score indicates less cognitive impairment.

  26. Change in PDQ-D Sub-scales - Planning and Organisation Sub-score [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The PDQ-D planning and organisation sub-score consists of items 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 of the PDQ (see Outcome 23) with a score ranging from 0 to 20. A higher score reflects greater subjective cognitive impairment. A reduction in score indicates less cognitive impairment.

  27. Change in SDS Item Scores - Family [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The SDS item family is rated from 0 = normal functioning to 10 = severe functional impairment (see outcome 4). A higher score represents more severe functional impairment. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.

  28. Change in SDS Item Scores - Work [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The SDS item work is rated from 0 = normal functioning to 10 = severe functional impairment (see outcome 4). A higher score represents more severe functional impairment. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.

  29. Change in SDS Item Scores - Social Life [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The SDS item social life is rated from 0 = normal functioning to 10 = severe functional impairment (see outcome 4). A higher score represents more severe functional impairment. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.

  30. Change in SDS Item Scores - Number of Days Lost [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    This SDS item captures days lost from school or work (see outcome 4).

  31. Change in SDS Item Scores - Number of Underproductive Days [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    This SDS item captures the number of underproductive days (see outcome 4)

  32. Change in WLQ Using the Global Productivity Index [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The WLQ is a patient self-rated scale designed to assess on-the-job impact of chronic health problems and/or treatment. The WLQ consists of 25 items in 4 dimensions: limitations handling time (5 items), physical work demands (6 items), mental-interpersonal work demands (9 items), and output demands (5 items). Each item is rated on a 5-point scale from "All of the Time" (score 5) to "None of the Time" (score 0), or "Does Not Apply to My Job". The Global Productivity Index is calculated as a weighed sum of the 4 dimensions, and ranges from 0.000 to 0.286. Reduction in score indicates less work limitation.

  33. Change in WLQ Domain Scores - Limitations Handling Time [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    Limitations Handling Time is scored on a scale of 0 (limited at work none of the time) to 100 (limited at work all of the time) based on a converted mean score. A reduction in score indicates less work limitation.

  34. Change in WLQ Domain Scores - Mental-Interpersonal Work Demands [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    Mental-Interpersonal Work Demands is scored on a scale of 0 (limited at work none of the time) to 100 (limited at work all of the time) based on a converted mean score. A reduction in score indicates less work limitation.

  35. Change in WLQ Domain Scores - Physical Demands [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    Physical Demands is scored on a scale of 0 (limited at work none of the time) to 100 (limited at work all of the time) based on a converted mean score. A reduction in score indicates less work limitation.

  36. Change in WLQ Domain Scores - Output Demands [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    Output Demands is scored on a scale of 0 (limited at work none of the time) to 100 (limited at work all of the time) based on a converted mean score. A reduction in score indicates less work limitation.

  37. Change in Adult ADHD Quality of Life Measure (AAQoL) Total Score [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The AAQoL is a patient-rated scale designed to assess health-related quality of life in adults with ADHD. The AAQoL consists of 29 items, each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (not at all/never) to 5 (extremely/very often). The AAQoL Total score is based on all 29 items and ranges from 29 to 145. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.

  38. Change in AAQoL Subscales - Life Productivity Sub-score [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The AAQoL is a patient-rated scale designed to assess health-related quality of life in adults with ADHD. The AAQoL consists of 29 items, each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (not at all/never) to 5 (extremely/very often). The AAQoL Life productivity subscale is based on 11 items and ranges from 11 to 55. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.

  39. Change in AAQoL Subscales - Psychological Health Sub-score [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The AAQoL is a patient-rated scale designed to assess health-related quality of life in adults with ADHD. The AAQoL consists of 29 items, each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (not at all/never) to 5 (extremely/very often). The AAQoL Psychological Health subscale is based on 6 items and ranges from 6 to 30. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.

  40. Change in AAQoL Subscales - Life Outlook Sub-score [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The AAQoL is a patient-rated scale designed to assess health-related quality of life in adults with ADHD. The AAQoL consists of 29 items, each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (not at all/never) to 5 (extremely/very often). The AAQoL Life Outlook subscale is based on 7 items and ranges from 7 to 35. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.

  41. Change in AAQoL Subscales - Relationships Sub-score [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 ]
    The AAQoL is a patient-rated scale designed to assess health-related quality of life in adults with ADHD. The AAQoL consists of 29 items, each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (not at all/never) to 5 (extremely/very often). The AAQoL Relationship subscale is based on 5 items and ranges from 5 to 25. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 55 Years   (Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient is willing and able to attend study appointments within the specified time windows.
  • The patient is an outpatient.
  • The patient is diagnosed with a primary diagnosis of ADHD according to the DSM-5™ classification.
  • The patient has an AISRS total score ≥24.
  • The patient has a CGI-S rating ≥4 (moderately ill or worse).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has previously been treated with vortioxetine.
  • The patient has any current psychiatric disorder (DSM-IV-TR™ criteria), other than ADHD, as assessed using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI).
  • The patient has a known first-degree relative with bipolar disorder.
  • The patient suffers from intellectual disability as evaluated by the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) II vocabulary and matrix.
  • The patient suffers from organic mental disorders, or mental disorders due to a general medical condition (DSM-5™ criteria).
  • The patient has reported current use of, or has tested positive for, drugs of abuse (opiates, methadone, cocaine, amphetamines [including ecstasy], barbiturates, benzodiazepines, and cannabinoids). If a patient tests positive for opiates due to incidental use of codeine containing medication, as assessed in a clinical interview, the drug screen may be repeated up to three weeks later but the retest result must be available from the central laboratory latest at Visit 2 and has to be negative for this patient to be eligible for enrolment. If a patient tests positive for amphetamines due to his/her ADHD current treatment, as confirmed by a clinical interview, the patient is eligible for enrolment provided this treatment is discontinued two weeks prior to the Baseline Visit.
  • The patient has a history of two prior failed (<50% improvement in symptoms) adequate trials of ADHD treatment.
  • The patient has any other disorder for which the treatment takes priority over treatment of ADHD or is likely to interfere with study treatment or impair treatment compliance.
  • The patient has a history of moderate or severe head trauma or other neurological disorders or systemic medical diseases that are, in the investigator's opinion, likely to affect central nervous system functioning.
  • The patient has attempted suicide within the last 6 months or is at significant risk of suicide (either in the opinion of the Investigator or defined as a "yes" to suicidal ideation questions 4 or 5 or answering "yes" to suicidal behaviour on the Columbia-Suicide Rating Scale (C-SSRS) within the last 12 months).

Other protocol defined inclusion and exclusion criteria do apply


Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02327013


Locations
United States, California
US015
Beverly Hills, California, United States
US002
Garden Grove, California, United States
US004
National City, California, United States
United States, Florida
US013
Bradenton, Florida, United States
US006
Gainesville, Florida, United States
United States, Georgia
US010
Alpharetta, Georgia, United States
United States, Illinois
US014
Libertyville, Illinois, United States
United States, Maryland
US011
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
United States, Massachusetts
US009
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
United States, Nevada
US016
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
United States, New York
US005
New York, New York, United States
US008
New York, New York, United States
United States, Texas
US001
Austin, Texas, United States
United States, Virginia
US007
Herndon, Virginia, United States
United States, Washington
US003
Bellevue, Washington, United States
Sponsors and Collaborators
H. Lundbeck A/S
Investigators
Study Director: Email contact via H. Lundbeck A/S LundbeckClinicalTrials@Lundbeck.com

Responsible Party: H. Lundbeck A/S
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02327013     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 15996A
First Posted: December 30, 2014    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: January 31, 2018
Last Update Posted: March 7, 2018
Last Verified: February 2018

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity
Hyperkinesis
Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders
Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Mental Disorders
Dyskinesias
Neurologic Manifestations
Nervous System Diseases
Signs and Symptoms
Vortioxetine
Anti-Anxiety Agents
Tranquilizing Agents
Central Nervous System Depressants
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Psychotropic Drugs
Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors
Neurotransmitter Uptake Inhibitors
Membrane Transport Modulators
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Neurotransmitter Agents
Serotonin Agents
Serotonin 5-HT1 Receptor Agonists
Serotonin Receptor Agonists
Serotonin 5-HT1 Receptor Antagonists
Serotonin Antagonists
Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists