We're building a better ClinicalTrials.gov. Check it out and tell us what you think!
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

COPD Aerosol Study Comparing the Efficacy of Nebulizers Versus Dry Powder Inhalers

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02291016
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : November 14, 2014
Results First Posted : March 19, 2019
Last Update Posted : March 19, 2019
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Mylan Specialty L.P.
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Rajiv Dhand, MD, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine

Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to compare drug delivery and lung function after treatment with formoterol from a nebulizer versus a dry powder inhaler (DPI) in patients recovering from severe exacerbations of COPD. This is to determine if one device is superior in providing better lung function and drug deposition in this clinical setting.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
COPD Exacerbation Drug: Formoterol Other: Placebo Not Applicable

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 7 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment
Masking: Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Randomized, Double-Dummy, Crossover, Single-Center Study Comparing the Efficacy of Nebulizers Versus Dry Powder Inhalers in the Treatment of Patients Recovering From Severe Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Study Start Date : February 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date : March 2016
Actual Study Completion Date : March 2016


Arm Intervention/treatment
Active Comparator: Formoterol via DPI then Formoterol via nebulizer

Group A: Received Formoterol 12 µg via DPI and placebo via nebulizer at treatment visit #1, and Formoterol 20 µg (solution form) via nebulizer and placebo via DPI at treatment visit 2.

Placebo: The placebo used will be sterile, preservative free, normal saline for nebulizer inhalation and a matched capsule without active drug for the dry powder inhaler. All patients will receive 2 ml of normal saline with the nebulizer to match the volume of nebulized formoterol solution. Patients will receive formoterol and placebo at both study visit #1 and visit #2.

Drug: Formoterol
Comparison of dosage administered via a nebulizer versus dosage administered via a dry powder inhaler. 12 µg Formoterol with the dry powder inhaler and 20 µg (solution form) of Formoterol with the nebulizer. Patients will receive formoterol and placebo at both study visit #1 and visit #2.
Other Names:
  • Foradil
  • PERFOROMIST

Other: Placebo
Comparison of drug administered via a nebulizer versus a dry powder inhaler. The placebo used will be sterile, preservative free, normal saline for inhalation for the nebulizer and a matched capsule without active drug for the dry powder inhaler. All patients will receive 2 ml of normal saline with the nebulizer to match the volume of nebulized formoterol solution. Patients will receive formoterol and placebo at both study visit #1 and visit #2.
Other Name: Normal Saline

Active Comparator: Formoterol via nebulizer then Formoterol via DPI

Group B: Received Formoterol 20 µg (solution form) via nebulizer and placebo via a DPI at treatment visit #1, and Formoterol 12 µg via a DPI with placebo via nebulizer at treatment visit 2.

Placebo: The placebo used will be sterile, preservative free, normal saline for nebulizer inhalation and a matched capsule without active drug for the dry powder inhaler. All patients will receive 2 ml of normal saline with the nebulizer to match the volume of nebulized formoterol solution. Patients will receive formoterol and placebo at both study visit #1 and visit #2.

Drug: Formoterol
Comparison of dosage administered via a nebulizer versus dosage administered via a dry powder inhaler. 12 µg Formoterol with the dry powder inhaler and 20 µg (solution form) of Formoterol with the nebulizer. Patients will receive formoterol and placebo at both study visit #1 and visit #2.
Other Names:
  • Foradil
  • PERFOROMIST

Other: Placebo
Comparison of drug administered via a nebulizer versus a dry powder inhaler. The placebo used will be sterile, preservative free, normal saline for inhalation for the nebulizer and a matched capsule without active drug for the dry powder inhaler. All patients will receive 2 ml of normal saline with the nebulizer to match the volume of nebulized formoterol solution. Patients will receive formoterol and placebo at both study visit #1 and visit #2.
Other Name: Normal Saline




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. The Difference Between the Values of Area Under the Response Curve for FEV1 [ Time Frame: Baseline through study completion (visit 1 through visit 2) ]
    The difference between the values of area under the response curve for FEV1 from baseline through four hours (AUC FEV1 0-4h) after inhalation of formoterol with a nebulizer or a dry powder inhaler.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Percentage Change in Peak FEV1 From Baseline After Inhalation of Formoterol [ Time Frame: From pre-dose formoterol (baseline 0hrs) to 30 minutes, 1,2, and 4 hours post dose at visit 1 and measured again at visit 2 ]

    Change in peak FEV1 from Baseline. This will be completed at visit 1 and visit 2.

    Steps:

    1. A baseline (pre-dose formoterol) FEV1 will be recorded.
    2. Subjects will be dosed with formoterol.
    3. Serial FEV1 assessments will completed at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hour, and 4 hour post dose of formoterol so a peak measurement can be recorded.
    4. A percentage of change between the baseline and peak FEV1 will be recorded for this outcome measure. A higher value indicates a better result.

  2. Absolute Increase in FEV1 From Baseline After Inhalation of Formoterol [ Time Frame: Measured at visit 1 and visit 2 after dosing and all FEV1 testing has been completed ]

    Increase in FEV1 from Baseline to 4 hours post dose of formoterol. This will be completed at visit 1 and visit 2.

    Steps:

    1. A baseline (pre-dose formoterol) FEV1 was recorded.
    2. Subjects was dosed with formoterol.
    3. Serial FEV1 assessments were completed, and recorded at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hour, and 4 hour post dose of formoterol so serial FEV1 measurements could be recorded.

  3. Peak FEV1 Between the Two Devices (Nebulizer and DPI) [ Time Frame: Measured from Start of visit 1 until the completion of visit 2 ]

    Change in peak FEV1 from Baseline. This will be completed at visit 1 and visit 2.

    Steps:

    1. A baseline (pre-dose formoterol) FEV1 was recorded.
    2. Subjects were dosed with formoterol.
    3. Serial FEV1 assessments were completed at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hour, and 4 hour post dose of formoterol so a peak measurement could recorded.

    5. Peak measurements from visit 1 and visit 2 will be compared for any significant change in FEV1 values.


  4. Change in FEV1 as a Percentage of Predicted Normal After Inhalation of Formoterol [ Time Frame: Baseline through study completion (visit 1 through visit 2) ]

    Change in FEV1 from Baseline through 4 hours post formoterol dose. This was completed at visit 1 and visit 2.

    Steps:

    1. A baseline (pre-dose formoterol) FEV1 was recorded.
    2. Subjects were dosed with formoterol.
    3. Serial FEV1 assessments were completed at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hour, and 4 hour post dose of formoterol and serial FEV1 values were recorded.
    4. A percentage of change from baseline FEV1 to each serial measurement of FEV1 was collected. The % of change at each time point was then used to get a measure of overall percentage change of the predicted FEV1 value.

  5. Area Under the Response Curve for FVC From Baseline Through Four Hours (AUC FVC0-4h) After Inhalation of Formoterol [ Time Frame: Measured at visit 1 and again at the end of visit 2 ]

    Steps:

    1. A baseline (pre-dose formoterol) FVC was recorded.
    2. Subjects were dosed with formoterol.
    3. Serial FVC assessments were completed at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hour, and 4 hour post dose of formoterol and serial FVC values were recorded.

    Data was all time points were used to obtain the total area under the curve


  6. Percentage Change in Peak FVC From Baseline After Inhalation of Formoterol [ Time Frame: Measured at visit 1 and again at the end of visit 2 ]
    1. A baseline (pre-dose formoterol) FVC was recorded.
    2. Subjects were dosed with formoterol.
    3. Serial FVC assessments were completed at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hour, and 4 hour post dose of formoterol and serial FVC values were recorded.
    4. A percentage of change between the baseline and peak FVC will be recorded for this outcome measure.

  7. Peak FVC Between the Two Devices (Nebulizer and DPI) [ Time Frame: Peak FVC at visit 1 will be compared to the peak FVC at visit 2 for any significant change. ]

    Steps:

    1. A baseline (pre-dose formoterol) FVC was recorded.
    2. Subjects were dosed with formoterol.
    3. Serial FVC assessments were completed at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hour, and 4 hour post dose of formoterol and serial FVC values were recorded.
    4. Peak FVC was recorded for this outcome measure and compared amongst groups.

  8. Change in Dyspnea Based on the Borg Dyspnea Scale for Shortness of Breath (Pre-dose Administration and 60 Minutes After Inhalation of Formoterol With a Nebulizer or a DPI) [ Time Frame: Measured at visit 1 and again at the end of visit 2 ]
    The Shortness of Breath Modified Borg Dyspnea Scale The scale goes from 0-10, zero meaning no difficulty breathing and ten meaning maximal difficulty. A decrease of score indicates an improvement. Patients were asked to complete the scale pre-dose and again one hour post formoterol dose. This was completed at both visit 1 and visit 2. The value recorded was the difference between the baseline value and the post 60 minute value.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   40 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Current or past cigarette smoking history of >/= 10 pack-years.
  • FEV1/FVC ratio </= 70%.
  • Known diagnosis of COPD.
  • Current hospitalization for a primary diagnosis of acute exacerbation of COPD.
  • Must be able to understand and willing to sign an informed consent document.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • On a ventilator or mask ventilation.
  • Allergy or contraindication to Formoterol use.
  • Marked QTc prolongation (> 450 ms).
  • Liver cirrhosis or chronic renal insufficiency (serum creatinine > 2 mg/dL).
  • Atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response (heart rate > 110 bpm) or ventricular arrhythmia (frequent PVCs, ventricular tachycardia).
  • Acute myocardial infarction within 12 weeks of patient study registration.
  • Known pulmonary embolism.
  • Known or suspected lung cancer.
  • Known neuromuscular disease, stroke with residual hemiparesis, or untreated Parkinsonism
  • Pregnant or nursing women or women of childbearing potential not using a medically approved means of contraception (i.e., oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, diaphragm, or sub dermal implants).
  • Inability to understand instructions.
  • Participation in another investigational drug clinical trial within 30 days of patient study registration.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02291016


Locations
Layout table for location information
United States, Tennessee
University of Tennessee Medical Center
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37920
Sponsors and Collaborators
University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine
Mylan Specialty L.P.
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Rajiv Dhand, MD University of Tennessee Medical Center
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Rajiv Dhand, MD, Principal Investigator, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02291016    
Other Study ID Numbers: 3798
First Posted: November 14, 2014    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: March 19, 2019
Last Update Posted: March 19, 2019
Last Verified: February 2019
Keywords provided by Rajiv Dhand, MD, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine:
COPD
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Formoterol Fumarate
Bronchodilator Agents
Autonomic Agents
Peripheral Nervous System Agents
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Anti-Asthmatic Agents
Respiratory System Agents
Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists
Adrenergic beta-Agonists
Adrenergic Agonists
Adrenergic Agents
Neurotransmitter Agents
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action