A Study Comparing the Bioequivalence of Azelastine Hydrochloride and Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray (Apotex, Inc.) to That of Dymista™ Nasal Spray (Meda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02279563|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified October 2014 by Apotex Inc..
Recruitment status was: Enrolling by invitation
First Posted : October 31, 2014
Last Update Posted : October 31, 2014
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- How to Read a Study Record
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis||Drug: Azelastine HCl and Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray, 137 µg/50 µg per spray Drug: Dymista™ Nasal Spray Drug: Placebo||Phase 2|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||595 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)|
|Official Title:||A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled,Parallel-group Study Comparing the Bioequivalence of Azelastine Hydrochloride and Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray (Apotex, Inc.) to That of Dymista™ Nasal Spray (Meda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. )in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis|
|Study Start Date :||December 2013|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||February 2014|
Experimental: Azelastine HCl and Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
The investigational product was administered via nasal inhalation with one spray in each nostril twice daily.
Batch Number KL1981, Expiry Date Mar 2015.
Drug: Azelastine HCl and Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray, 137 µg/50 µg per spray
During the placebo lead-in period, the placebo nasal spray was administered via nasal inhalation with one spray in each nostril twice daily for 7days.
During the randomized treatment period, the investigational products (experimental, active comparator and placebo nasal spray) were administered via nasal inhalation with one spray in each nostril twice daily for 14 days
Active Comparator: Dymista™ Nasal Spray
The reference product was administered via nasal inhalation with one spray in each nostril twice daily.
Batch Number G30349, Expiry Date Mar 2015.
Drug: Dymista™ Nasal Spray
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Nasal Spray
The placebo was administered via nasal inhalation with one spray in each nostril twice daily.
Batch Number KL0781, Expiry Date Mar 2015.
- Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (Change from baseline in the combined reflective TNSS (combined AM and PM reflective scores of runny nose, nasal congestion, nasal itchiness, and sneezing) [ Time Frame: 2 months ]Change from baseline in the combined AM and PM instantaneous scores of runny nose, nasal congestion, nasal itchiness, and sneezing.
- Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (Change from baseline in the combined AM and PM instantaneous scores of runny nose, nasal congestion, nasal itchiness, and sneezing.) [ Time Frame: 2 months ]Change from baseline in the combined AM and PM instantaneous scores of runny nose, nasal congestion, nasal itchiness, and sneezing.
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
|Ages Eligible for Study:||18 Years to 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)|
|Sexes Eligible for Study:||All|
|Accepts Healthy Volunteers:||No|
Subjects who met all of the following criteria were eligible for inclusion in the study:
- Subjects who provided written informed consent.
- Subjects who were able to read and understand English.
- Males or females, 18 to 65 years old, inclusive.
- If the subject was a female of childbearing potential, she was not pregnant (confirmed by negative urine pregnancy test) or lactating. Females of childbearing potential agreed to use reliable birth control measures throughout the study, defined as abstinence or use of an effective method of birth control (double barrier [female subject's partner using condom and female subject using diaphragm, contraceptive sponge, spermicide, or intrauterine device], or the use of a hormonal contraceptive [oral, patch, or inserted under the skin or injected into the muscle]). Female subjects who used oral contraceptives or levonorgestrel implants were required to have started the method at least 90 days prior to the screening visit. A female of childbearing potential was defined as a female who had experienced menarche, and who had not undergone successful surgical sterilization (hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy or ovariectomy, bilateral tubal ligation or salpingectomy) or was not post-menopausal for at least 1 year.
- At least a 2-year reliable medical history consistent with SAR, defined as symptoms present during the previous two grass and/or pollen seasons.
- Positive skin test within 12 months of screening to at least one currently present seasonal allergen in the geographical area that had a predictable allergen season (eg, birch pollen, ragweed, Mountain Cedar, etc) with a minimum skin test response of 3 mm or greater than a negative control, and a positive test to histamine, also defined as a response of 3 mm or greater than the negative control.
- Was capable of tolerating intranasal application of the study drug.
- No clinically significant results from the screening physical examination, nasal examination, and medical history.
- Was willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol and was available for the full duration of the study, with no planned travel outside of the pollen area for a substantial portion (>48 hours) of the study period.
- Was, in the Investigator's judgment (through exposure to allergen), expected to require treatment throughout the entire study period.
Subjects who met any of the following criteria were excluded from the study:
- Signs or symptoms of nasal polyps, deviated septum, or any other condition (including nasal piercing within the previous 3 months) which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may have resulted in erroneous study data.
- Underwent nasal surgery or had nasal trauma within 3 months of Visit 1 (screening).
- Had active respiratory conditions that included, but were not limited to, acute or exacerbated chronic sinusitis, an abnormal sinus radiograph, an upper or lower respiratory tract infection, or rhinitis medicamentosa.
- Had PAR that required or was expected to require active PAR treatment during the study period.
- Had a respiratory tract infection (including otitis media and streptococcus) that required antibiotic treatment within 2 weeks of Visit 1 (screening).
- Used any of the prohibited medications prior to the start of the single-blind, placebo lead-in visit (Visit 2) within the time period specified in the protocol
|Responsible Party:||Apotex Inc.|
|Other Study ID Numbers:||
|First Posted:||October 31, 2014 Key Record Dates|
|Last Update Posted:||October 31, 2014|
|Last Verified:||October 2014|
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal
Respiratory Tract Infections
Respiratory Tract Diseases
Immune System Diseases
Peripheral Nervous System Agents
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Respiratory System Agents
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating
Histamine H1 Antagonists