Study of a Quality Improvement Toolkit in Kerala, India, Among Hospitals Treating Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients (ACS QUIK)
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02256657 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : October 3, 2014
Last Update Posted : August 17, 2018
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Acute Coronary Syndrome | Behavioral: Quality Improvement Toolkit | Not Applicable |
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Actual Enrollment : | 21374 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | None (Open Label) |
Primary Purpose: | Health Services Research |
Official Title: | Acute Coronary Syndrome Quality Improvement in Kerala (ACS QUIK) Cluster Randomized, Stepped Wedge Multi-center Implementation of a Locally-Developed Quality Improvement Toolkit |
Actual Study Start Date : | November 2014 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | December 2016 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | December 2017 |

Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Step 1: Toolkit Implemented in Month 4
Quality Improvement Toolkit
|
Behavioral: Quality Improvement Toolkit
The quality improvement toolkit is comprised of standardized admission and discharge checklists, clinical pathways, an audit and feedback mechanism through electronic data capture, and a monthly report used in conjunction with root cause analysis meetings. Quality improvement toolkits are implemented by individual hospitals. |
Experimental: Step 2: Toolkit Implemented in Month 8
Quality Improvement Toolkit
|
Behavioral: Quality Improvement Toolkit
The quality improvement toolkit is comprised of standardized admission and discharge checklists, clinical pathways, an audit and feedback mechanism through electronic data capture, and a monthly report used in conjunction with root cause analysis meetings. Quality improvement toolkits are implemented by individual hospitals. |
Experimental: Step 3: Toolkit Implemented in Month 12
Quality Improvement Toolkit
|
Behavioral: Quality Improvement Toolkit
The quality improvement toolkit is comprised of standardized admission and discharge checklists, clinical pathways, an audit and feedback mechanism through electronic data capture, and a monthly report used in conjunction with root cause analysis meetings. Quality improvement toolkits are implemented by individual hospitals. |
Experimental: Step 4: Toolkit Implemented in Month 16
Quality Improvement Toolkit
|
Behavioral: Quality Improvement Toolkit
The quality improvement toolkit is comprised of standardized admission and discharge checklists, clinical pathways, an audit and feedback mechanism through electronic data capture, and a monthly report used in conjunction with root cause analysis meetings. Quality improvement toolkits are implemented by individual hospitals. |
Experimental: Step 5: Toolkit Implemented in Month 20
Quality Improvement Toolkit
|
Behavioral: Quality Improvement Toolkit
The quality improvement toolkit is comprised of standardized admission and discharge checklists, clinical pathways, an audit and feedback mechanism through electronic data capture, and a monthly report used in conjunction with root cause analysis meetings. Quality improvement toolkits are implemented by individual hospitals. |
- 30-Day Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events [ Time Frame: 30 Days from Hospital Discharge ]Compared with usual care, to evaluate the effect of a locally-developed, evidence-based health care quality improvement toolkit on 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE [death, reinfarction stroke, or major bleeding]) in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome, adjusted for hospital, time, and step.
- In-Hospital Medication Rates [ Time Frame: 30 Days ]Compared with usual care, to evaluate the effect of a locally-developed, evidence-based health care quality improvement toolkit on in-hospital medication prescription rates.
- Discharge Medication Rates [ Time Frame: 30 Days ]Compared with usual care, to evaluate the effect of a locally-developed, evidence-based health care quality improvement toolkit on discharge medication prescription rates.
- Discharge Advice Relative to Healthy Lifestyles [ Time Frame: 30 Days ]Compared with usual care, to evaluate the effect of a locally-developed, evidence-based health care quality improvement toolkit on discharge advice relative to healthy lifestyles.
- In-Hospital and 30-Day Expanded MACE [ Time Frame: 30 Days ]Compared with usual care, to evaluate the effect of a locally-developed, evidence-based health care quality improvement toolkit on in-hospital and 30-day expanded MACE.
- Concordance with locally-defined performance measures and in-hospital and 30-day MACE [ Time Frame: 30 Days ]To evaluate the association between concordance with locally-defined performance measures for ACS care and in-hospital and 30-day MACE.
- Health Related Quality of Life [ Time Frame: 30 Days ]To evaluate health related quality of life in post-ACS patients (30-days) using a translated and validated version of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ).
- Impoverishing Effects of an ACS Event [ Time Frame: 30 Days ]To evaluate individual- and household-level impoverishing effects of an ACS event in the context of the recent implementation of a national government insurance program for families below the poverty line.

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Presenting with Acute Coronary Syndrome
Exclusion Criteria:
- Below the Age of 18
- Patient without Acute Coronary Syndrome

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02256657

Principal Investigator: | Mark D Huffman, MD, MPH | Northwestern University | |
Study Director: | PP Mohanan, MD, DM | WestFort Hi-Tech Hospital | |
Study Chair: | Doirairaj Prabhakaran, MD, DM | Centre for Chronic Disease Control | |
Study Chair: | Donald Lloyd-Jones, MD, ScM | Northwestern University |
Other Publications:
Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Responsible Party: | Mark Huffman, Assistant Professor in Preventive Medicine and Medicine-Cardiology, Northwestern University |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT02256657 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
ACS QUIK 1K99HL107749-01A1 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract ) R00HL107749-03 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract ) |
First Posted: | October 3, 2014 Key Record Dates |
Last Update Posted: | August 17, 2018 |
Last Verified: | August 2018 |
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
Plan to Share IPD: | Yes |
Plan Description: | De-identified individual patient data for ACS QUIK will be shared through NHBLI BIOLINCC. |
Supporting Materials: |
Study Protocol Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) Informed Consent Form (ICF) Clinical Study Report (CSR) Analytic Code |
Time Frame: | Data have been distributed to NHLBI BIOLINCC. |
Access Criteria: | Access to data will be managed through NLHBI BIOLINCC request process. |
Acute Coronary Syndrome Syndrome Disease Pathologic Processes |
Myocardial Ischemia Heart Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Vascular Diseases |