Ultrashort GnRH Agonist/Antagonist Versus GnRH Antagonist IVF
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02173977 |
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified June 2014 by Sheba Medical Center.
Recruitment status was: Not yet recruiting
First Posted : June 25, 2014
Last Update Posted : June 25, 2014
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the appropriate controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocol in good prognosis patients undergoing IVF treatment. The stimulation characteristics of cycles which include ultrashort flare GnRH agonist combined with flexible multidose GnRH antagonist will be compared to the flexible multidose GnRH antagonist protocol.
The investigators hypothesized that combining the stimulatory effect of GnRH agonists and immediate suppression of the GnRH antagonist in a unique protocol may be a valuable new COH strategy for IVF patients, resulting in improved ART outcome.
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Infertility | Other: ARM A- Agonist/Antagonist protocol Other: ARM B- Antagonist protocol | Phase 2 |
The ultrashort flare GnRH agonist combined with flexible multidose GnRH antagonist protocol during COH cycle resulted in a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate in patients with poor embryo quality, with repeated IVF failures and in poor responders. This protocol combines the effect of the microdose flare on endogenous follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) release with the benefit of an immediate luteinizing hormone suppression of the GnRH antagonist.
The basic hypothesis of this approach can also benefit IVF patients with good prognosis without compromising the ability to use gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to effectively trigger ovulation, while completely eliminating any threat of clinically significant ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).
The purpose of the study is to compare cycles consisting of ultrashort flare GnRH agonist combined with flexible multidose GnRH antagonist with those using the flexible multidose GnRH antagonist protocol
1. To compare the IVF outcome variables and ongoing pregnancy rates.
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Estimated Enrollment : | 200 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | None (Open Label) |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | Ultrashort Flare GnRH Agonist Combined With Flexible Multidose GnRH Antagonist Versus Flexible Multidose GnRH Antagonist for Good-prognosis IVF Patients |
Study Start Date : | June 2014 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date : | May 2016 |
Estimated Study Completion Date : | May 2017 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: ARM A- Agonist/Antagonist protocol
The Ultrashort GnRH Agonist/antagonist method entails pre-treatment with oral contraceptive pills before the combination of GnRH ultrashort agonist and antagonist protocol
|
Other: ARM A- Agonist/Antagonist protocol
In vitro fertilization (IVF/ICSI) Other: ARM B- Antagonist protocol In vitro fertilization (IVF/ICSI) |
Active Comparator: ARM B- Antagonist protocol
The standard IVF method entails Flexible Multidose GnRH Antagonist protocol during COH
|
Other: ARM A- Agonist/Antagonist protocol
In vitro fertilization (IVF/ICSI) Other: ARM B- Antagonist protocol In vitro fertilization (IVF/ICSI) |
- Ongoing pregnancy rates [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
- Total gonadotropin use [ Time Frame: 2 Years ]
- Biochemical pregnancy [ Time Frame: 2 Years ]Positive pregnancy test without documentation of intrauterine or extrauterine pregnancy
- Clinical pregnancy [ Time Frame: 2 Years ]Positive pregnancy test with documentation of intrauterine or extrauterine pregnancy
- Multiple pregnancy rate [ Time Frame: 2 Years ]
- Miscarriage rate [ Time Frame: 2 Years ]
- Fertilization rate [ Time Frame: 2 Years ]
- Number of oocytes [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
- OHSS rates [ Time Frame: 2 Years ]
- Embryo quality [ Time Frame: 2 Years ]
Grading of a day 3 embryo based on the number of cells that make up the embryo, the amount of fragmentation, and the symmetry of each of the embryo's cells (blastomeres).
E.g. good quality embryos: embryos that reach the eight-cell stage with less than 20% fragmentation on day 3
- Positive Pregnancy Test [ Time Frame: 2 Years ]

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 20 Years to 35 Years (Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | Female |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Up to three previous IVF attempts
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with poor or no response in previous COH for IVF cycles
- Abnormal ovarian reserve test i.e. anti-mullerian hormone (AMH), Antral follicle test
- Risk factor for Diminished Ovarian Reserve

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02173977
Israel | |
Sheba Medical Center- IVF unit | |
Ramat Gan, Israel, 52621 |
Principal Investigator: | Raoul Orvieto, MD | Infertility & IVF Unit, Dept. Obstetrics & Gynecology - Director |
Responsible Party: | Sheba Medical Center |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT02173977 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
SHEBA-14-1078-RO-CTIL |
First Posted: | June 25, 2014 Key Record Dates |
Last Update Posted: | June 25, 2014 |
Last Verified: | June 2014 |
GnRH Agonist GnRH Antagonist OHSS |
Infertility |