Ultrasound - Guided Paramedian Techniques in Spinal Anesthesia
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02171975|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : June 24, 2014
Last Update Posted : June 24, 2014
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Anaesthesia||Procedure: pre-procedure ultrasound guided paramedian spinal Procedure: Conventional landmark guided midline spinal anaesthetic||Not Applicable|
Spinal anesthesia is widely performed using a surface landmark based 'blind' technique. Multiple passes and attempts while administering spinal anesthesia are associated with a greater incidence of post dural-puncture headache, paraesthesia and spinal hematoma.
Real time and pre-procedural neuraxial ultrasound techniques have been used to improve the success rate of spinal anesthesia. The use of real time ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia has to date been limited to case series and case reports. Its use may be limited by the requirement for wide bore needles and the technical difficulties associated with simultaneous ultrasound scanning and needle advancement. The use of pre-procedural ultrasound has been shown to increase the first pass success rate for spinal anesthesia only in patients with difficult surface anatomic landmarks.No technique has been shown to improve the success rate of dural puncture when applied routinely to all patients.
Studies on pre-procedural ultrasound-guided spinal techniques are limited to a midline approach using a transverse median view (TM). The parasagittal oblique (PSO) view consistently offers better ultrasound view of the neuraxis compared to TM views. However no studies have been conducted to assess whether these superior PSO views translate into easier paramedian needle insertion.
We hypothesised that the routine use of pre-procedural ultrasound-guided paramedian spinal technique results in less number of passes required to enter the subarachnoid space when compared to the conventional landmark based midline approach.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||100 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Official Title:||A Comparison of Conventional Landmark Guided Midline Versus Pre-procedure Ultrasound - Guided Paramedian Techniques in Spinal Anesthesia|
|Study Start Date :||February 2014|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||May 2014|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||May 2014|
Active Comparator: Group C
Patients in this group underwent Conventional landmark guided midline spinal anaesthetic.
Procedure: Conventional landmark guided midline spinal anaesthetic
Spinal anaesthesia was administered based on conventional landmark based midline approach.
Experimental: Group P
This group had their spinal anaesthetic done based on pre-procedure ultrasound guided paramedian spinal
Procedure: pre-procedure ultrasound guided paramedian spinal
In group P, a portable ultrasound unit was used for initial pre-procedural marking. The interspinous space at which the clearest image of the anterior complex (ligamentum flavum dura complex- LFD) and posterior complex (posterior longitudinal ligament- PLL) was obtained, was selected. At the selected interspace, and with the probe positioned to obtain the clearest ultrasound image, a skin marker was used to mark the midpoint of the long border of the probe and the midpoints of the short borders of the probe . At the same horizontal level as the midpoint of the long border of the probe, the midpoint of the line drawn between the two short border midpoints of the probe was used as paramedian insertion point for the spinal needle.
- Number of passes [ Time Frame: Up to 45 minutes from the start of insertion of spinal needled for administration of spinal anaesthetic ]The number of passes, defined as the number of forward advancements of the spinal needle in a given interspinous space (i.e. withdrawal and redirection of spinal needle without exiting the skin)
- Number of spinal needle insertion attempts [ Time Frame: Up to 45 minutes from the start of insertion of spinal needled for administration of spinal anaesthetic ]number of spinal needle insertion attempts (defined as the number of times the spinal needle was withdrawn from the skin and reinserted) were noted
- Blood in spinal needle [ Time Frame: Up to 45 minutes from the start of insertion of spinal needled for administration of spinal anaesthetic ]Presence of blood in spinal needle
- Time for identifying landmarks [ Time Frame: Up to 10 minutes fraom start of plapating for landmarks - Completed once anethetist declares that markings are complete ]Time for identifying landmarks in group C was defined as time from which the anesthesiologist started palpating to identify the landmarks to completion of the process as declared by the anesthesiologist. In group P it was defined as time from which the ultrasound probe was placed on the skin to the anesthesiologist declaring that the markings are completed
- Time taken for performing spinal anesthetic [ Time Frame: Up to 45 minutes from the start of insertion of spinal needled for administration of spinal anaesthetic ]defined as time taken from insertion of introducer needle to completion of injection
- Incidence of radicular pain [ Time Frame: Up to 24 hours after administration of spinal anaesthetic ]Shooting pain going down along one of the dermatomal levels in the leg
- Presence of paresthesia [ Time Frame: Up to 24 hours after administration of spinal anaesthetic ]Paresthesia along dermatomal distribution during performing spinal anaesthetic
- Grading of palpated landmarks [ Time Frame: Up to 10 minutes fraom start of plapating for landmarks - Completed once anethetist declares that markings are complete ]Anesthesiologist palpated the landmarks after positioning and graded the ease of palpation on a 4 point scale (easy, moderate, difficult or impossible)
- Peri-procedural VAS scores of pain at injection site [ Time Frame: up to 30 minutes following spinal anaesthetic injection and prior to sedation ]After positioning and prior to administration of sedation, patients were asked for their peri-procedural pain scores measured using an 11 point verbal rating scale (0=no pain, 10=most pain imaginable)
- peri-procedural discomfort scores [ Time Frame: up to 30 minutes following spinal anaesthetic injection and prior to sedation ]peri-procedural discomfort scores measured using an 11 point verbal rating measured (0= no discomfort, 10=most discomfort imaginable).
- Level of block [ Time Frame: 15 minutes after spinal anaesthetic injection ]Dermatomal level at which loss of cold sensation (ethyl chloride spray) occurs
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02171975
|South Infirmary Victoria University Hospital|
|Principal Investigator:||Karthikeyan Kallidaikurichi Srinivasan, FCARCSI,MD||Cork University Hospital|