Ruxolitinib in Combination With Pemetrexed/Cisplatin in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02119650 |
Recruitment Status :
Terminated
(The study was terminated as other related studies of ruxolitinib did not provide sufficient efficacy to warrant continuation.)
First Posted : April 22, 2014
Results First Posted : June 14, 2017
Last Update Posted : February 13, 2018
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
NSCLC (Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma) | Drug: Ruxolitinib Drug: Placebo Drug: Pemetrexed Drug: Cisplatin | Phase 2 |
The study consisted of an open-label, safety run-in (consisting of 1 to 4 cohorts of 9 participants each), to confirm the safety of ruxolitinib in combination with pemetrexed/cisplatin in participants with nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is Stage IIIB, Stage IV, or recurrent. Participants in the safety run-in received open-label ruxolitinib and pemetrexed and cisplatin.
In the second part of the study, participants enrolled and randomized and received pemetrexed and cisplatin (open-label) and either ruxolitinib or placebo in a blinded manner. The dose of ruxolitinib administered was determined from the data produced in the safety run-in phase.
Treatment consisted of repeating 21-day cycles. Participants received infusions of pemetrexed and cisplatin on Day 1 of each cycle and ruxolitinib/placebo was self-administered during the entire cycle. Maintenance therapy with ruxolitinib or placebo in combination with pemetrexed, based on the original treatment assignment, was allowed for participants eligible for maintenance therapy.
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Actual Enrollment : | 76 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | Double (Participant, Investigator) |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | A Randomized, Double-Blind Phase 2 Study of Ruxolitinib or Placebo in Combination With Pemetrexed/Cisplatin and Pemetrexed Maintenance for Initial Treatment of Subjects With Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer That Is Stage IIIB, Stage IV, or Recurrent |
Actual Study Start Date : | February 11, 2014 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | February 11, 2016 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | June 21, 2016 |

Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Ruxolitinib plus Pemetrexed/Cisplatin |
Drug: Ruxolitinib
5 mg tablets to be administered by mouth at dose selected from safety run-in phase (Ruxolitinib 15 mg twice daily (BID))
Other Names:
Drug: Pemetrexed 500 mg/m^2 administered as an intravenous infusion over 10 minutes
Other Name: Alimta® Drug: Cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 infused over 2 hours beginning 30 ± 5 minutes after the end of the pemetrexed infusion |
Active Comparator: Placebo plus Pemetrexed/Cisplatin |
Drug: Placebo
5 mg matching placebo tablets to be administered by mouth Drug: Pemetrexed 500 mg/m^2 administered as an intravenous infusion over 10 minutes
Other Name: Alimta® Drug: Cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 infused over 2 hours beginning 30 ± 5 minutes after the end of the pemetrexed infusion |
- Overall Survival (OS) [ Time Frame: Randomization until death due to any cause; up to 16 months or data cutoff 11FEB2016. ]Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without death observed at the time of the analysis were censored at last date known to be alive. The median overall survival time was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Overall survival was compared between treatment groups using log-rank test.
- Progression-free Survival (PFS) [ Time Frame: Randomization to disease progression, or death due to any cause if sooner; up to 16 months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016. ]PFS is defined as the time from randomization until the earliest date of disease progression determined by investigator assessment of objective radiographic disease assessments per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1, or death due to any cause if sooner. Progressive Disease (PD) is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum Longest Diameter (LD) recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions, unequivocal progression of non-target lesions or increase in disease burden for subjects with only nonmeasurable disease.
- Objective Response Rate (ORR) [ Time Frame: Baseline through end of study; up to 16 months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016. ]Objective response rate determined by radiographic disease assessments per RECIST (v1.1), by investigator assessment and was defined as the percentage of participants with Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) at any post baseline visit. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST) for target lesions and assessed by computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) : Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions with no worsening of non-target lesions and no new lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
- Duration of Response [ Time Frame: From the start of response to the end of response; up to 16 months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016. ]For objective responders, the duration of response is defined as the difference of the end of response and the start of response. The start of a response was the first visit where the subject achieves PR or better based on RECIST v1.1 criteria. The end of response was the first visit after PD based on RECIST v1.1 criteria.
- Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) [ Time Frame: Baseline through approximately 30 days post treatment discontinuation; up to 16 months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016. ]A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an event occurring (or worsening of any pre-existing) after exposure to at least 1 dose of study drug. A treatment-related AE was defined as an event with a definite, probable, or possible causality to study medication. A serious AE is an event resulting in death, hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or is life threatening, a congenital anomaly/birth defect or requires medical or surgical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes above. The intensity of an AE was graded according to the National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03: Grade 1 (Mild); Grade 2 (Moderate); Grade 3 (Severe); Grade 4 (life-threatening).

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of nonsquamous NSCLC that is Stage IIIB Stage IV, or recurrent after prior definitive intervention (radiation, surgery, or chemoradiation therapy, with or without adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy).
- Radiographically measurable or evaluable disease.
- Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks.
- Tumor without activating driver mutations for which there is available therapy (eg, tumor without mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor or anaplastic lymphoma).
-
An modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) of 1 or 2 as defined below:
-
Criteria:
- C-reactive protein >10 mg/L AND albumin ≥35 g/L; Score = 1
- C-reactive protein >10 mg L AND albumin <35 g/L; Score = 2
-
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 1.
- Adequate renal, hepatic, and bone marrow function demonstrated by protocol-specified laboratory parameters at the screening visit.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Squamous or mixed histology (eg, adenosquamous) NSCLC
- Previous systemic therapy for advanced or metastatic disease.
- Known active central nervous system (CNS) metastases.
- Current or previous other malignancy within 2 years of study entry, except cured basal or squamous cell skin cancer, superficial bladder cancer, prostate intraepithelial neoplasm, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or other noninvasive or indolent malignancy without sponsor approval.
- Current uncontrolled cardiac disease such as angina or myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure including New York Heart Association functional classification of 3, or arrhythmia requiring treatment.
- Uncontrolled concomitant medical conditions, including, but not limited to, renal, hepatic, hematologic, gastrointestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, neurological, cerebral, or psychiatric diseases.

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02119650
United States, Arizona | |
Phoenix, Arizona, United States | |
United States, Arkansas | |
Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States | |
United States, California | |
Fresno, California, United States | |
La Jolla, California, United States | |
San Diego, California, United States | |
San Francisco, California, United States | |
United States, Colorado | |
Lone Tree, Colorado, United States | |
United States, Connecticut | |
Norwich, Connecticut, United States | |
Southington, Connecticut, United States | |
United States, Georgia | |
Augusta, Georgia, United States | |
United States, Illinois | |
Joliet, Illinois, United States | |
United States, Indiana | |
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States | |
Lafayette, Indiana, United States | |
United States, Kansas | |
Kansas City, Kansas, United States | |
United States, Michigan | |
Detroit, Michigan, United States | |
United States, Missouri | |
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States | |
United States, Nevada | |
Reno, Nevada, United States | |
United States, New Hampshire | |
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States | |
United States, New York | |
Mount Kisco, New York, United States | |
New York, New York, United States | |
United States, North Carolina | |
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States | |
United States, Ohio | |
Canton, Ohio, United States | |
United States, Oregon | |
Portland, Oregon, United States | |
United States, Tennessee | |
Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States | |
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States | |
Memphis, Tennessee, United States | |
United States, Utah | |
Ogden, Utah, United States | |
United States, Virginia | |
Leesburg, Virginia, United States | |
United States, Washington | |
Kennewick, Washington, United States | |
Seattle, Washington, United States |
Study Director: | Gerard T Kennealey, MD | Incyte Corporation |
Responsible Party: | Incyte Corporation |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT02119650 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
INCB 18424-266 |
First Posted: | April 22, 2014 Key Record Dates |
Results First Posted: | June 14, 2017 |
Last Update Posted: | February 13, 2018 |
Last Verified: | January 2018 |
Non small cell lung cancer |
Lung Neoplasms Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung Respiratory Tract Neoplasms Thoracic Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site Neoplasms Lung Diseases Respiratory Tract Diseases |
Carcinoma, Bronchogenic Bronchial Neoplasms Pemetrexed Antineoplastic Agents Enzyme Inhibitors Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Folic Acid Antagonists Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors |