Working... Menu
Trial record 65 of 245 for:    "ottawa heart institute"

Anti-arrhythmic Therapy vs Catheter Ablation as First Line Treatment for AICD Shock Prevention (AVATAR)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. Identifier: NCT02114528
Recruitment Status : Terminated (Low recruitment. Pilot trial.)
First Posted : April 15, 2014
Last Update Posted : November 17, 2015
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation

Brief Summary:

The purpose of this study is to determine whether catheter based ablation is better than conventional anti-arrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy for reducing recurrent shocks in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The second purpose of the study is to determine the safety of catheter-based ablation and the effect on quality of life of patients.

The study hypothesis is that catheter ablation is superior to AAD therapy in preventing recurrent ventricular arrhythmia in such subjects. This is a pilot trial which will provide data regarding recruitment potential and the feasibility of conducting a larger trial.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Ventricular Tachycardia Ventricular Arrhythmia Drug: Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy Procedure: Catheter ablation Phase 4

Detailed Description:

AAD and catheter ablation have been shown to reduce the incidence of recurrent AICD shocks. The disadvantages of AAD include side effects from medications and the lack of compliance during long-term therapy. Previous trials have demonstrated the feasibility, safety and efficacy of catheter ablation as "first-line" treatment for reducing recurrent ventricular arrhythmia and AICD shocks in this subject population. However, these catheter ablation trials did not systematically compare the efficacy of catheter ablation with AAD therapy. While both treatment strategies have been shown to be effective in this setting it is unclear how they compare with each other in preventing AICD shocks.

This is a single centre, parallel group, two-arm, unblinded randomized vanguard pilot trial comparing catheter ablation with AAD therapy for preventing recurrent AICD shocks.

Eligible and consenting subjects will be equally randomized to receive either AAD therapy or a catheter ablation procedure.

A 30-day treatment period will be provided to allow for adequate time to implement the two treatments.

Subjects randomized to the antiarrhythmic therapy arm will receive clinically effective loading doses of either sotalol, mexiletine, procainamide or amiodarone (oral or IV) alone or in combination, as chosen by the study investigator.

Subjects randomized to the catheter ablation arm will undergo the procedure within the 30 treatment period. Concomitant antiarrhythmic therapy with amiodarone or other AAD will be avoided if possible in the ablation group. However, AAD may be used to suppress ventricular arrhythmia resulting in AICD shocks or anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) while waiting for the catheter ablation procedure.

Subjects will be seen for a baseline randomization visit, then at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after enrollment and every 3 months thereafter until the end of the study. Subjects will be followed up for a minimum of 12 months and a maximum of 24 months.

Quality of life questionnaires will be done at each visit. Standard of care blood work, chest x-ray, and ECG will be done in the AAD arm depending on the AAD chosen as treatment. ICD programming will be standardized for all subjects.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 40 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Antiarrhythmic Therapy Versus Catheter Ablation as First Line Treatment for AICD Shock Prevention: A Randomized Vanguard Pilot Trial
Study Start Date : October 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date : November 2015
Actual Study Completion Date : November 2015

Arm Intervention/treatment
Active Comparator: Anti-arrhythmic drug therapy
Oral and/or intravenous loading doses of Sotalol, mexiletine, procainamide or amiodarone as first line therapy. Drug chosen is preference of the treating physician. May use single or combination of AAD. Loading doses as per standard dosing guidelines for VT. Subjects on amiodarone should receive oral maintenance dose of at least 200 mg/day.
Drug: Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy
Either one or more of the following antiarrhythmic drugs: sotalol, mexiletine, procainamide, or amiodarone.
Other Name: Betapace (sotalol), Mexitil (mexiletine), Pronestyl (procainamide), Cordarone (amiodarone)

Active Comparator: Catheter ablation
Ventricular tachycardia (VT) Catheter ablation, using a standardized VT ablation procedure protocol.
Procedure: Catheter ablation
Ventricular tachycardia catheter ablation.

Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Appropriate ICD therapy [ Time Frame: After 30 day treatment period ]
    Appropriate AICD therapy after the 30 day treatment period; defined as ≥ 1 appropriate Shock or ATP that needs further intervention in the form of catheter ablation or AAD therapy.

Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Composite Safety Endpoint [ Time Frame: Up to 24 months ]
    1. Catheter ablation arm- procedure related complications, need for concomitant use of AAD (sotalol, mexiletine, propafenone or amiodarone) and/or death.
    2. Antiarrhythmic arm- medication side effects, discontinuation of AAD and death, inappropriate shocks from AICD.
    3. Slow VT below AICD tachyarrhythmia detection threshold that leads to hospitalization or necessitates catheter ablation
    4. Mortality
    5. Quality of life score in each treatment arm using the EQ-5D questionnaire
    6. Health care resource utilization

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.

Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 85 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥ 18 and ≤ 85 years old
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • AICD implanted for primary prophylaxis against sudden cardiac death
  • AICD implanted for secondary prophylaxis against spontaneous or inducible sustained VT without any reversible causes
  • CAD with prior myocardial infarction (>60 days prior to enrollment)
  • AICD or ECG documentation of ventricular arrhythmia responsible for appropriate AICD therapy (> 3 ATP or ≥ 1 appropriate Shock)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication or allergy to contrast media, routine procedural medications or catheter materials
  • Contraindication to an interventional procedure
  • Current or previous (within 3 months) antiarrhythmic therapy
  • Absolute contraindication to amiodarone or other AAD
  • New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class IV
  • Stroke within the past 90 days
  • Unstable angina
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia, Brugada Syndrome, Catecholamine sensitive polymorphic VT or long QT syndrome
  • Subjects with active ischemia that are eligible for revascularization
  • Life expectancy less than 6 months
  • Incessant or multiple episodes of VT requiring immediate therapy with medications or ablation
  • Untreated hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism. Subjects who are euthyroid on thyroid hormone replacement therapy are acceptable.
  • Current enrollment in another investigational drug or device study.
  • Presence of any other condition that the investigator feels would be problematic or would restrict or limit the participation of the Subject for the entire study period.
  • Absolute contra-indication to the use of heparin and or warfarin.
  • Documented intra-atrial thrombus, ventricular thrombus (< 6 months after detection of thrombus), tumor, or another abnormality, which precludes catheter introduction.
  • Previous VT ablation
  • Are pregnant.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its identifier (NCT number): NCT02114528

Layout table for location information
Canada, Ontario
University of Ottawa Heart Institute
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1Y 4W7
Sponsors and Collaborators
Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Girish Nair, MD Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation

Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation Identifier: NCT02114528     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 20130425
First Posted: April 15, 2014    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: November 17, 2015
Last Verified: November 2015

Keywords provided by Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation:
Ventricular Tachycardia
Ventricular Arrhythmia
Anti-arrhythmic drugs
Catheter Ablation
ICD Shocks

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Tachycardia, Ventricular
Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Heart Diseases
Cardiovascular Diseases
Cardiac Conduction System Disease
Pathologic Processes
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
Vasodilator Agents
Potassium Channel Blockers
Membrane Transport Modulators
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Sodium Channel Blockers
Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A2 Inhibitors
Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors
Enzyme Inhibitors
Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9 Inhibitors
Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6 Inhibitors
Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
Adrenergic Antagonists
Adrenergic Agents
Neurotransmitter Agents
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Autonomic Agents