Electroacupuncture Versus Fast-track Perioperative Program for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02059603|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified February 2014 by Simon S. M. Ng, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Recruitment status was: Recruiting
First Posted : February 11, 2014
Last Update Posted : February 11, 2014
Background: Our previous study demonstrated that electroacupuncture at Zusanli, Sanyinjiao, Hegu, and Zhigou reduces the duration of postoperative ileus and hospital stay after laparoscopic colorectal surgery within a traditional perioperative care setting. Recent evidence also suggested that a 'fast-track' perioperative program may help accelerate recovery after colorectal surgery. As electroacupuncture is simpler to implement and less labor intensive, it may be the preferred adjunct therapy if it is proven to be noninferior to fast-track program in reducing the duration of postoperative ileus and hospital stay after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Objectives: To compare the efficacy of electroacupuncture and fast-track program in reducing the duration of postoperative ileus and hospital stay after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Design: Prospective, randomized, noninferiority trial.
Subjects: One hundred sixty-four consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic resection of colonic and upper rectal cancer will be recruited.
Interventions: Patients will be randomly allocated to receive either: (A) electroacupuncture with traditional perioperative care; or (B) fast-track program without acupuncture.
Outcome measures: Primary outcome: time to defecation. Secondary outcomes: duration of hospital stay, time of first passing flatus, time to resume diet, pain scores, analgesic requirement, morbidity, and medical costs.
Conclusions: This study will determine if electroacupuncture is noninferior to fast-track program in reducing the duration of postoperative ileus and hospital stay after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Electroacupuncture may be the preferred perioperative adjunct therapy to laparoscopic colorectal surgery because it is simpler to implement and less labor intensive than fast-track program.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Postoperative Ileus||Procedure: Electroacupuncture Procedure: Fast-track program||Phase 3|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||164 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||A Randomized Clinical Trial of Electroacupuncture Versus Fast-track Perioperative Program for Reducing Duration of Postoperative Ileus and Hospital Stay After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery|
|Study Start Date :||January 2014|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||December 2015|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||December 2015|
Bilateral acupoints relevant to the treatment of abdominal pain, abdominal distension, and constipation, including Zusanli (stomach meridian ST-36), Sanyinjiao (spleen meridian SP-6), Hegu (large intestine meridian LI-4), and Zhigou (triple energizer meridian TE-6), will be used. Electric stimulation at a frequency of 50 Hz will be employed to the acupuncture needles.
Active Comparator: Fast-track program
The design of this program is based on the consensus between our surgeons, anesthetists, physiotherapists, dietitians, and nurses, who have reviewed the relevant literature and made appropriate adjustments to suit the local situation.
Procedure: Fast-track program
- Time to defecation [ Time Frame: Up to 1 month ]Measured in hours, from the time the laparoscopic surgery ends till the first observed passage of stool.
- Total postoperative hospital stay [ Time Frame: Up to 1 month ]Including hospital stay of patients who are readmitted within 30 days after surgery.
- Time of first passing flatus reported by the patients [ Time Frame: Up to 1 month ]
- Time that the patients tolerated solid diet [ Time Frame: Up to 1 month ]
- Time to walk independently [ Time Frame: Up to 1 month ]
- Pain scores on visual analog scale [ Time Frame: Up to 1 month ]From 0 which implies no pain at all, to 100 which implies the worst pain imaginable; assessed at 4, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery.
- Morbidity [ Time Frame: Up to 1 month ]
- Mortality [ Time Frame: Up to 1 month ]
- Readmission rate [ Time Frame: Up to 1 month ]
- Quality of life [ Time Frame: Up to 1 month ]Quality of life at 2 and 4 weeks after surgery, measured by SF-36, EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38 questionnaires
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02059603
|Contact: Simon S. M. Ng, MD||(852) 2632 email@example.com|
|Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong||Recruiting|
|Hong Kong, China|
|Contact: Simon SM Ng, MD (852) 2632 1495 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Contact: Tony WC Mak, MD (852) 2632 1495 email@example.com|
|Principal Investigator: Simon SM Ng, MD|
|Sub-Investigator: Tony WC Mak, MD|
|Principal Investigator:||Simon S. M. Ng, MD||Chinese University of Hong Kong|