Default Options in Advance Directives
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02017548|
Recruitment Status : Active, not recruiting
First Posted : December 20, 2013
Last Update Posted : May 2, 2017
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment|
|This Study Will Focus on Advance Care Planning Among Patients With Life-limiting Illnesses||Behavioral: Life-extension default advance directive Behavioral: Comfort default advance directive|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||270 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)|
|Primary Purpose:||Health Services Research|
|Official Title:||Default Options in Advance Directives|
|Study Start Date :||January 2014|
|Primary Completion Date :||November 2016|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||August 2017|
Experimental: Life-extension default
Subjects in this group will receive an advance directive form that defaults to an overall goal of care directed towards life extension (vs. comfort oriented care) unless the subject specifies otherwise. The form also states 4 specific life extending interventions (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, hemodialysis, and feeding tube insertion) will be provided unless patients specifically opt-out from such selections. It also will state that upon discharge from the hospital, long-term care (vs. hospice care) will be provided unless the patient chooses otherwise.
|Behavioral: Life-extension default advance directive|
Experimental: Comfort default
Subjects in this group will receive an advance directive form that defaults to an overall goal of care directed towards comfort and relief of pain and suffering (vs. life extension) unless the subject specifies otherwise. The form also states 4 specific life extending interventions (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, hemodialysis, and feeding tube insertion) will be not provided unless patients specifically opts into such selections. It also will state that upon discharge from the hospital, hospice care (vs. long-term care) will be provided unless the patient chooses otherwise.
|Behavioral: Comfort default advance directive|
No Intervention: Standard advance directive
Subjects in the standard advance directive (AD) group will receive an AD that will have no options pre-selected.
- Hospital free days [ Time Frame: 6 months ]The primary outcome is "Hospital-Free Days" (HFDs), a measure that PI Halpern has been developing in collaboration with Dr. Jeffrey Silber at Penn's Center for Outcomes Research. As the name describes, HFDs represent the number of days alive and not in an acute care facility. Although this is a simple concept, and provides an outcome measure of obvious importance to patients, the use of HFDs as a primary outcome in an RCT is highly innovative. To bolster confidence in the results, we will evaluate two key variations on the theme. First, we will explore "Healthcare Facility-Free Days," which represents the number of days alive where a patient is in neither an acute care facility, a chronic care facility, or a nursing home. We will also evaluate HFDs within a defined period of follow-up - 6 months in this case. This is analogous to the established outcome of ventilator-free days used commonly in RCTs among ICU patients
- Hospital and ICU admissions [ Time Frame: up to 1 year ]The numbers of admissions will be analyzed as count data. From the dates of hospital and ICU admissions, we will calculate the proportion of each patient's total survival time during study follow-up that was spent in the hospital or ICU.
- Costs of care [ Time Frame: up to 1 year ]We will combine all costs of inpatient and outpatient hospice, hospital stays, and life-sustaining procedures. The perspective will be that of all potential payers. Costs will be inflated to the date on which analyses are performed using the U.S. gross domestic product deflator
- Hospice utilization [ Time Frame: up to 1 year ]We will analyze hospice utilization in 2 ways: (a) time from advance directive completion to hospice enrollment; and (b) duration of hospice utilization prior to death.
- Choices to receive 4 potentially life-sustaining interventions, and the concordance of these choices with whether the interventions were actually received [ Time Frame: up to 1 year ]We will record selections that patients made on their advance directives about 4 specific life-sustaining interventions. Utilizing data from the Pennsylvania Healthcare Cost Containment Consortium and the New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services, we will be able to determine which patients received each intervention. Thus, we will be able to reliably evaluate the proportions of patients who received unwanted interventions. Because we cannot determine the denominator of patients with indications for these interventions, we will not evaluate the proportions of patients who went without desired services.
- Choices regarding post-hospitalization care, and the concordance of these choices with the care actually received [ Time Frame: up to 1 year ]Patients will indicate on their advance directives forms their selections for post-hospitalization care. We will utilize data from the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Consortium and New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services to asses if the care patient indicate is the care they receive.
- Decision conflict [ Time Frame: up to 1 year ]The decision conflict scale is a well-validated instrument used to assess patients' certainty in making healthcare decisions. The DCS will be sent home with consenting patients to complete and return along with their advance directive forms and an instruction sheet explaining to patients that they should complete their advance directive forms first, followed by the DCS, and both should be mailed to the research team in the provided stamped envelope.
- Decision satisfaction [ Time Frame: up to 1 year ]Satisfaction will also be measured with the CANHELP instrument's global satisfaction with end-of-life care question.
- Quality of Life using the McGill Quality of Life (MQOL) instrument. [ Time Frame: up to 1 year ]The MQOL is a well-Validated and widely used scale designed specifically for patients with serious illnesses. The MQOL can be completed by family members on behalf of patients who have lost the capacity to complete it themselves. Thus, we will have surrogates (the individuals identified on patients' advance directive forms as their appointed healthcare agents) complete the MQOL for incapacitated patients to minimize missing data.
- Surrogates' Perception of the quality of death and dying [ Time Frame: within 3 months of patient death ]Because we are recruiting patients with serious life-limiting illnesses, we anticipate that some patients will die over the course of this study period. We will speak with surrogates of deceased patients to assess their perceived quality of death and dying using Prigerson's Quality of Death measure.
- Post-traumatic stress in surrogates [ Time Frame: within 3 months of patient death ]The risk of post-traumatic stress disorder in surrogates among deceased patients will be assessed using the Impact of Events Scale. The IES is a valid and reliable scale that has been used frequently to assess PTSD risk among family members of critically ill patients.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02017548
|United States, Pennsylvania|
|Penn Presbyterian Medical Center|
|Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104|
|The Perelman Center for Advance Medicine|
|Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104|
|Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107|
|University of Pittsburgh Medical Center|
|Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213|
|Principal Investigator:||Scott D. Halpern, MD, PhD||University of Pennsylvania|