This site became the new on June 19th. Learn more.
Show more Menu IMPORTANT: Listing of a study on this site does not reflect endorsement by the National Institutes of Health. Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more... Menu IMPORTANT: Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more... Menu
Give us feedback

Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) for Dysphagia in Neonates

This study has been terminated.
(Difficulty with recruiting patients; poor quality of EMG)
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Sanford Health Identifier:
First received: October 14, 2013
Last updated: July 17, 2017
Last verified: September 2016
The purpose of this study is to evaluate if the use of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) will provide a more efficient method of treating neonates with dysfunctional oral feeding such as dysphagia. This study will attempt to determine if NMES applied to neonates at 36-42 weeks post-conception age (PCA) will decrease the need for nasogastric tubes (NG) and gastrostomy tubes (G-TUBE). Increase the rate at which these neonates complete full oral feeds, improve their swallowing skills, increase oral intake of calories, and gain weight.

Condition Intervention
Dysphagia Device: VitalStim Device: Sham VitalStim

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Randomized Treatment of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) for Dysphagia in Neonates

Resource links provided by NLM:

Further study details as provided by Sanford Health:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Reduction in G-tube rate insertions for the treatment grouped compared to the sham group. [ Time Frame: Over the course of the treatment time frame to discharge, 2 weeks to 8 weeks ]
  • Increased percent of subjects towards achieving full oral feedings earlier in the subject's dysphagia treatment. [ Time Frame: Over the course of the treatment time frame to discharge, 2 weeks to 8 weeks ]
  • Increase the amount of formula volume taken at feedings from beginning to end of study. [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ]
  • Earlier NG tube removal for the treatment group compared to the control group. [ Time Frame: Over the course of the treatment time frame to discharge, 2 weeks to 8 weeks ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Improve swallowing skills as measured by videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) and the video swallow assessment worksheet. [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ]
  • Decrease spells with oral feeds over the course of the study. [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ]
  • Allow for healthy weight gain via improved feedings. [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ]
  • Increase the caloric intake orally. [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ]
  • Decrease the oxygen requirement before and after study. [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ]
  • Decrease inpatient length of stay. [ Time Frame: 4 weeks ]

Enrollment: 12
Study Start Date: November 2013
Study Completion Date: July 2016
Primary Completion Date: July 2016 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Experimental: VitalStim
This group will be assigned to the active VitalStim unit.
Device: VitalStim
This group will receive active VitalStim treatment.
Sham Comparator: Sham VitalStim
This group will be assigned to the sham VitalStim unit.
Device: Sham VitalStim
This group will receive a sham VitalStim intervention.


Ages Eligible for Study:   36 Weeks to 42 Weeks   (Child)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female.
  • Meet diagnostic criteria for dysphagia symptoms using the NOMAS and a VFSS.
  • Infants with intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and hypoxic events can be included.
  • Infants taking less than 5-10% of target volume by mouth between the ages of 36-42 weeks PCA.
  • Multiple swallows to clear bolus following suck that includes a desaturation <80% and bradycardia <80 bpm.
  • Apnea spells during feeds.
  • Aspiration or penetration by VFSS

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known neurologic or neurodegenerative disorders.
  • Chromosomal anomalies and syndromes.
  • Cleft lip or palate.
  • Birth defects.
  • Unresolved cutaneous rash at the area of electrode placement.
  • Medical condition that is a contraindication to NMES.
  Contacts and Locations
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

Please refer to this study by its identifier: NCT02007759

United States, South Dakota
Sanford USD Medical Center
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States, 57117
Sponsors and Collaborators
Sanford Health
Principal Investigator: Akram Khan, MD Sanford Health
  More Information

Responsible Party: Sanford Health Identifier: NCT02007759     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: SH NMES for Dysphagia
Study First Received: October 14, 2013
Last Updated: July 17, 2017

Keywords provided by Sanford Health:
neuromuscular electrical stimulation

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Deglutition Disorders
Esophageal Diseases
Gastrointestinal Diseases
Digestive System Diseases
Pharyngeal Diseases
Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases processed this record on September 19, 2017