CCTG 594: Engagement and Retention in Care for HIV+
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01957748|
Recruitment Status : Active, not recruiting
First Posted : October 8, 2013
Last Update Posted : February 28, 2017
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Patient Adherence HIV Positive||Behavioral: SoC + ALERT Intervention||Not Applicable|
Design: CCTG 594 is a controlled, unblinded, two-arm, randomized (1:1) clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a clinic-based HIV ALERT specialist on improving endpoints of retention in care and maintenance of ART as compared to the current standard of care (SoC) in HIV primary care clinics.
Duration: Each subject will receive follow-up of at least 48 weeks.
Sample Size: A total of 300 subjects will be randomized, 150 per arm.
Study Population: Eligible subjects will include 1) newly diagnosed HIV-infected individuals entering primary HIV care at one of the CCTG clinics, or 2) previously diagnosed HIV-infected individuals who are "out of care" defined as having no visit with a prescribing HIV provider in the last 180 days and not on a stable ARV regimen.
Stratification: Subjects will be stratified based on study site and if they are newly diagnosed or returning to care.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||300 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Primary Purpose:||Health Services Research|
|Official Title:||CCTG 594: Engagement and Retention in Care for HIV+, A Multicenter Trial of the California Collaborative Treatment Group|
|Actual Study Start Date :||October 2013|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||April 2016|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||July 2017|
No Intervention: Standard of Care (SoC)
Subjects randomized to the Standard of Care Arm will receive their HIV clinic's current standard of care retention services.
Active Comparator: SoC + ALERT Intervention
Subjects randomized into the ALERT Enhanced Retention Intervention Arm will receive SoC at the HIV clinic where subjects are seen. In addition to SoC, the Intervention arm will receive aggressive engagement efforts by the ALERT specialist to ensure visit continuity and retention into care. The ALERT specialist will also administer an education intervention consisting of 5 retention modules designed to improve HIV knowledge and self-efficacy, and will also monitor health care visits and intervene via methods to track, find, and re-engage patients during the study.
Behavioral: SoC + ALERT Intervention
Enhanced retention efforts and education modules will be implemented by the ALERT Specialist to ensure retention to care.
- Time to lost to follow up [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48 ]The CCTG 594 primary outcome is "time to lost to follow up." Lost to follow up is defined as "no visit with a prescribing HIV provider in the last 180 days. All randomized subjects will be followed for a minimum of 48 weeks. Subjects that do not meet the primary endpoint by the time the study ends will be censored.
- Time to initiation of ART [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48 ]The CCTG 594 secondary outcome is "time to initiation of ART." All randomized subjects will be followed for a minimum of 48 weeks. Subjects that do not initiate ART will be censored at their last visit date.
- Descriptive analyses [ Time Frame: Baseline to two years ]
Descriptive secondary analyses comparing the two randomized groups will include:
- Baseline and follow-up scores on HIV and health literacy assessments, disclosure rates, adherence, and measures of self-efficacy
- Number of primary care visits per year
- HIV RNA < 50 and <200 copies/mL at years 1 and 2
- CD4 cell counts and changes from baseline in CD4 at years 1 through 2
- Scores on Beck Depression Index
- Substance use
- HIV high-risk transmission behaviors
- Time to AIDS diagnosis or death
- Return to Care after Primary Endpoint [ Time Frame: Baseline to 2 years ]Proportions of subjects that meet the primary endpoint but subsequently return to care will be compared between the randomized groups. The times between last visit and return visit will also be compared between the randomized groups.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01957748
|United States, California|
|University Southern California|
|Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033|
|University of California, San Diego|
|San Diego, California, United States, 92103|
|Harbor-UCLA Medical Center|
|Torrance, California, United States, 90502|
|Study Chair:||Amy Sitapati, MD||CCTG, UCSD AVRC, UCSD Owen Clinic|
|Study Chair:||Katya Calvo, MD||CCTG, Harbor-UCLA|