Allogeneic Multivirus - Directed Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes (CTL)
In this study, investigators are trying to see if infusion of T cells (called CTLs) will prevent or treat cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) and adenovirus (AdV) reactivation or infection.
Patients with blood cell cancer, other blood disease or a genetic disease may receive a stem cell transplant. After receiving transplant, they are at risk of infections until a new immune system to fight infections grows from the cord blood cells. In this study, investigators are trying to give special cells called T cells. These cells will try to fight viruses that can cause infection.
Investigators will test to see if blood cells from donor that have been grown in a special way, can prevent patients from getting an infection. EBV, AdV and CMV are viruses that can cause serious life-threatening infections in patients who have weak immune systems after transplant.
T lymphocytes can kill viral cells but normally there are not enough of them to kill all the virus infected cells after transplant. Some researcher have taken T cells from a person's blood, grown more of them in the laboratory and then given them back to the person during a viral infection after a bone marrow transplant. Some of these studies have shown a positive therapeutic effect in patients receiving the CTLs after a viral infection in the post-transplant period.
Investigators will grow these cells from donor in the laboratory in a way that will train them to recognize and remove viruses when the T cells are given after a transplant. Since most donors have previously been infected with EBV, CMV, and adenovirus, investigators are able to use their T cells that remember these viruses to grow the CTLs. However, they now also have a new way of growing CTLs from donors who have not been infected with CMV.
Drug: CTL for CMV seropositive donors
Drug: CTL for CMV naïve donors
|Study Design:||Allocation: Non-Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
|Official Title:||Allogeneic Multivirus - Directed Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes (CTL) Targeting CMV (IE1 and pp65), EBV (LMP2, EBNA1), and Adv (Hexon and Penton)|
- Assessments of patients with adverse events after mukti-virus specific CTL infusion. [ Time Frame: 45 days ]The primary endpoint for this phase I trial are feasibility and safety. Safety of administration of CTLs is 45 days. The safety endpoint will be defined as acute GvHD grades III-IV within 45 days of the last dose of CTLs or grades 3-5 infusion-related adverse events within 45 days of the last CTL dose or grades 4-5 non-hematological adverse events within 45 days of the last CTL dose and that are not due to the pre-existing infection or the original malignancy or pre-existing co-morbidities.
- Assessments of viral load response to the CTL infusion [ Time Frame: 3 months ]Assessment of the effect of the CTL infusion on viral load, reconstitution of antiviral immunity post-infusion, and clinical response.
|Study Start Date:||February 2014|
|Estimated Study Completion Date:||March 2018|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date:||February 2017 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
Experimental: CTL for CMV seropositive donors
CTL for CMV seropositive donors - Allogeneic Multivirus - Directed Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) targeting CMV (IE1 and pp65), EBV (LMP2, EBNA1), and Adv (Hexon and Penton) for CMV seropositive donors- three different dose levels are selected, starting with 5 x 106 (a T cell number more than an order of magnitude lower than that administered at the time of an unmanipulated marrow infusion), followed by 1 x 107 and a final dose 2 x 107 mCTLs/m2. Two additional doses (at the same level)will be administered 28 days after the first dose, in subjects that have a partial response after one dose or who receive other therapy that may affect the persistence or function of the infused CTL.
Drug: CTL for CMV seropositive donors
CTL for CMV seropositive donors-Allogeneic Multivirus Directed Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) targeting CMV (IE1 and pp65), EBV (LMP2, EBNA1), and Adv (Hexon and Penton) for CMV seropositive donors dose is depending on the toxicity outcome, the maximum sample size for the this phase I portion of the trial is 14. Upon the completion of mCTL safety evaluation, additional 7 patients will be accrued at the MTD level to evaluate its antiviral activity.
Experimental: CTL for CMV naïve donors
CTL for CMV naïve donors - Allogeneic Multivirus - Directed Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) targeting CMV (IE1 and pp65), EBV (LMP2, EBNA1), and Adv (Hexon and Penton)for CMV naïve donors-each group will undergo an identical dose escalation. Three different dose levels are selected, starting with 5 x 106 (a T cell number more than an order of magnitude lower than that administered at the time of an unmanipulated marrow infusion), followed by 1 x 107 and a final dose 2 x 107 mCTLs/m2. Two additional doses (at the same level)will be administered 28 days after the first dose, in subjects that have a partial response after one dose or who receive other therapy that may affect the persistence or function of the infused CTL.
Drug: CTL for CMV naïve donors
CTL for CMV naïve donors - Allogeneic Multivirus - Directed Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) targeting CMV (IE1 and pp65), EBV (LMP2, EBNA1), and Adv (Hexon and Penton) for CMV naïve donors dose is depending on the toxicity outcome, the maximum sample size for the this phase I portion of the trial is 14. Upon the completion of mCTL safety evaluation, additional 7 patients will be accrued at the MTD level to evaluate its antiviral activity.
Viral infections are normally controlled by T-cell immunity and so are an important cause of morbidity and mortality during the period of immune recovery after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).1 Risk for infection is impacted by the degree of tissue mismatch between donor and recipient and the immune status of the donor, including the degree and length of immunosuppression following transplantation. Reactivation of latent viruses such as cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) are common and often cause symptomatic disease. Respiratory viruses such as adenovirus also frequently cause infection. Antiviral pharmacologic agents are only effective against some of these viruses; their use is costly, and associated with significant toxicities and the outgrowth of drug-resistant mutants. As delay in recovery of virus-specific cellular immune response is clearly associated with viral reactivation and disease in these patients, cellular immunotherapy to restore viral-specific immunity is an attractive option that has already been successfully used to target some of these viruses.
Multivirus-Specific T Cells
To broaden the specificity of single CTL lines to include the three most common viral pathogens of stem cell recipients, investigators reactivated CMV and adenovirus-specific T cells by using mononuclear cells transduced with a recombinant adenoviral vector encoding the CMV antigen pp65 (Ad5f35CMVpp65). Subsequent stimulations with EBV-LCL transduced with the same vector both reactivated EBV-specific T cells and maintained the expansion of the activated adenovirus and CMV-specific T cells. This method reliably produced CTLs with cytotoxic function specific for all three viruses, which investigators infused into 14 stem cell recipients in a Phase I prophylaxis study. They observed recovery of immunity to CMV and EBV in all patients but an increase in adenovirus-specific T cells was only seen in patients who had evidence of adenovirus infection pre-infusion. A follow-up study in which the frequency of adenovirus-specific T cells was increased in the infused CTLs produced similar results, thus highlighting the importance of endogenous antigen to promote the expansion of infused T cells in vivo. Nevertheless, all patients in both clinical trials with pre-infusion CMV, adenovirus or EBV infection or reactivation were able to clear the infection, including one patient with severe adenoviral pneumonia requiring ventilatory support. CTLs recognizing multiple antigens can therefore produce clinically relevant effects against all three viruses.
CTLs for HSCT patients with virus naïve donors
All the donor specific T cell strategies discussed so far have utilized products derived from donors who are seropositive for the virus of interest. With the increasing use of cord blood (CB) grafts there are appreciable numbers of patients who are recipients of virus naïve donor grafts. CMV reactivation usually occurs from endogenous virus and seropositive recipients with seronegative donors remain the highest risk group for developing CMV. The development of multivirus specific T cells from recipients of cord blood grafts requires the priming of naïve T-cells rather than the simple expansion of pre-existing memory T-cells from seropositive donors. Using a protocol stimulating CB-derived T-cells with autologous CB-derived dendritic cells and EBV-LCL transduced with the Ad5f35CMVpp65 vector in the presence of IL-7, 12 and 15, multivirus specific T cells can be primed in vitro from the 20% fraction of a cord blood unit. So far, eight patients have received CTL as prophylaxis or treatment after CBT without toxicity. No infusion-related toxicities/GvHD have been observed and despite receiving only 80% of the CB unit, all patients engrafted neutrophils within 30 days. Early evidence of efficacy has also been demonstrated with clearance of EBV, CMV and adenovirus in two patients and decreasing EBV viral load in a third with the other 5 patients remaining virus free. Therefore, these results suggest that transfer of naïve T cell (CB)-derived virus specific T cells to patients after CBT may be safe and facilitate long term reconstitution of virus-specific T-cells in vivo.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01945814
|United States, District of Columbia|
|Childrens National Medical Center||Recruiting|
|Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010|
|Contact: Fahmida Hoq, MBBS, MS 202-476-3634 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Principal Investigator:||Catherine Bollard, MD||Children's Research Institute|