ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Comparison of Incision Angle of Mediolateral Episiotomy at 40 and 60 Degrees (IAME)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01930721
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified August 2013 by malka amen, Ain Shams Maternity Hospital.
Recruitment status was:  Recruiting
First Posted : August 29, 2013
Last Update Posted : August 29, 2013
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
malka amen, Ain Shams Maternity Hospital

Brief Summary:
The angle at which an episiotomy can be made is a continuous variable. If the investigators consider midline to be 0 degrees and a lateral episiotomy (never used today) to be 90 degrees, then it is theoretically possible to choose any angle from 0 to 90 degrees.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Obstetric Labor Complications Procedure: episiotomy Phase 2

Detailed Description:
Episiotomy is a surgical incision to the perineum in order to enlarge the vaginal orifice during the second stage of labor. Although seven types of episiotomy have been described in the literature , the most frequently performed types are the mediolateral and median episiotomies, with the former being the most common one. Despite being a common obstetric practice, the exact definition of a "mediolateral" episiotomy is often unclear. Several studies and reports, however, stated that a significant proportion of the so-claimed mediolateral episiotomy were not actually mediolateral. The current trial compares two angles of mediolateral episiotomy , regarding the risk of third- and fourth-degree perineal tearing, episiotomy-related pain and dyspareunia in primiparous women at a large tertiary maternity center, namely Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.

Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 330 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Comparison of Incision Angle of Mediolateral Episiotomy at 40 and 60 Degrees
Study Start Date : March 2012
Estimated Primary Completion Date : August 2013
Estimated Study Completion Date : September 2013

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: incision angle of 60 degrees
episiotomy incision angle will be defined as 60 degree as measured before cutting.
Procedure: episiotomy
incision angle of episiotomy will be 40 degree before cutting.
Experimental: incision angle 40 degree episiotomy
incision angle of episiotomy will be defined as 40 degree as measured before cutting.
Procedure: episiotomy
incision angle of episiotomy will be 60 degrees.



Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. and fourth degree perineal tears. [ Time Frame: intraoperative ]
    DESCRIBING THIRD AND FOURTH degree perieneal tears as regarding repair and post operative pain



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 45 Years   (Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Primigravida with singleton pregnancy presenting by vertex.
  2. Gestational age > 37 weeks
  3. No instrumental delivery.
  4. No fetal distress or any emergency

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Women had an episiotomy because of fetal distress and for technical reasons (emergency or episiotomy incised prior to the fetal head crowning the perineum.
  2. Inability to understand the informed consent.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01930721


Contacts
Contact: shafik adel, MD shafikadel@hotmail.com

Locations
Egypt
Ain Shams Unversity Hospitals Recruiting
Cairo, Egypt
Contact: adel shafik, lecturer    01005223586    shafikadel@yahoo.com   
Principal Investigator: malka ameen         
Sponsors and Collaborators
Ain Shams Maternity Hospital
Investigators
Principal Investigator: ADEL SH SLAH EL-DIN, MD LECTURER

Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Responsible Party: malka amen, resident, Ain Shams Maternity Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01930721     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: incision angle of mediolateral
First Posted: August 29, 2013    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: August 29, 2013
Last Verified: August 2013

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Obstetric Labor Complications
Pregnancy Complications