Gas Supply, Demand and Middle Ear Gas Balance: Specific Aim 3
This is a study to determine if there are reflexes that detect changes in eardrum position or in the pressure of middle-ear gases and respond with changes in the ease by which the Eustachian tube is opened. The Eustachian tube is the normal tube that connects the middle ear to the nose. It is usually closed, but can be opened by contraction of 2 small muscles that surround the tube. If the Eustachian tube does not open frequently enough, the pressure in the middle ear will decrease, the eardrum will be pulled in toward the middle ear causing a hearing loss, and fluid will accumulate in the middle ear to try and stabilize its pressure. There is some evidence that the changes in eardrum position and middle-ear pressure when the Eustachian tube does not open frequently enough can be detected by the brain that, in turn, sends signals to the Eustachian tube and its muscles to make Eustachian tube opening easier. In this study, we will test this possibility.
Specifically, in 7 experiments done on different days, we will move the eardrum in and out, apply different pressures to the middle ear, or change the composition of the gases in the middle ear while we measure how difficult it is to open the Eustachian tube by increasing middle-ear pressure or by measuring the "readiness" of the Eustachian tube muscles to contract and open the tube.
Other: varied middle-ear pressure
Drug: varied middle-ear gas composition
Other: varied ear-canal pressure
|Study Design:||Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Basic Science
|Official Title:||Middle Ear Pressure Regulation in Health and Disease/Gas Supply, Demand and Middle Ear Gas Balance: Specific Aim 3|
- EMG activity [ Time Frame: 2 visits (Visits 2 and 8), approximately 3 weeks apart ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]integrated EMG activity of tensor veli palatini muscle in response to changes in ear canal pressure and middle-ear pressure
- eustachian tube resistance [ Time Frame: 6 visits, approximately 2-3 days apart ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]change in eustachian tube resistance in response to changes in middle ear gas composition
|Study Start Date:||January 2016|
|Estimated Study Completion Date:||January 2017|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date:||January 2017 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
Experimental: healthy adults
Experiment 1 -- variation of ear-canal pressure; Experiment 2 -- varied middle-ear gas compositions; Experiment 3 -- variation of middle-ear pressure
|Other: varied middle-ear pressure Drug: varied middle-ear gas composition Other: varied ear-canal pressure|
Adequate middle ear (ME) pressure-regulation, defined as the maintenance of a total ME pressure at approximately ambient levels, is required for normal hearing and to preserve ME health. The mechanism of ME pressure-regulation consists of two distinct components that affect total ME gas pressure: the bolus, total gradient driven exchange of gases between the ME and nasopharynx during active, transient Eustachian tube (ET) openings and the passive, partial-pressure gradient driven diffusive exchange of gases between the ME cavity and adjacent compartments. A large number of past studies have described the basic physiology of gas transfers through the ET in humans, but few have explored the possibility that physiological feedback mechanisms could modulate ET functional efficiency. However, there is an anatomic foundation to support feedback modulation of ET function and the results for some experiments in animals lend credibility to that possibility. Theoretically, the sensory components of possible feedback pathways could consist of stretch sensors in the tympanic membrane (TM; detecting position) and tensor tympani muscle (detecting tension) and/or chemo- (detecting gas pressures)/ baro- (detecting total pressure) receptors in the ME mucosa and effector components consisting of resting Tensor Veli Palatini muscle (mTVP) tonus and/or the extant ET periluminal pressure.
In this study, we explore 3 hypothesized stimulus-effector pairings in 10 otherwise healthy adult subjects with no history of significant ME disease and normal audiologic testing. A custom ear plug will be made for use in Visits 3-7. The protocol includes 1 screening visit and 3 experiments requiring 7 experimental sessions of approximately 3-4 hours duration each done at a minimum interval of 3 days. Briefly, in Experiment 1 (Visit 2), ear canal pressure will be varied to change the position of the TM while simultaneously monitoring mTVP tonus by electromyography (EMG). Then, a unilateral ventilation tube (VT) inserted into the TM to allow access to the ME cavity. For Experiment 2, (Visits 3-7), the ME will be washed with physiologic, hypocarbic, hypercarbic, hypooxic and hyperoxic gas compositions (reference ME normal) while monitoring the ET periluminal tissue pressures measured as the ET resistance to gas flow. For Experiment 3 (Visit 8), total ME pressure will be varied while monitoring mTVP tonus by EMG. At the completion of Experiment 3, the VT will be removed and, then, the subjects will be followed weekly (Visits 9+) until documented healing of the TM at which time a standard audiologic assessment will be done. If the hypotheses are supported, selected activation of the feedback mechanisms would improve ET function and could be exploited as one component of a treatment protocol to improve ME pressure-regulation.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01925495
|Contact: Julianne Banks, BS||412-692-3595|
|Contact: Jenna El-Wagaa||412-692-3595|
|United States, Pennsylvania|
|Middle Ear Physiology Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh||Not yet recruiting|
|Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213|
|Sub-Investigator: Cuneyt M Alper, MD|
|Principal Investigator: William J Doyle, PhD|
|Sub-Investigator: Ellen M Mandel, MD|
|Sub-Investigator: Douglas Swarts, PhD|
|Sub-Investigator: Miriam S Teixeira, MD, PhD|
|Principal Investigator:||William J Doyle, PhD||University of Pittsburgh|