Identification of GENEtic Markers of Aggressiveness and Malignancy by Array Comparative Genomic Hybrization Analysis (CGH) (PITUIGENE)
Recent studies estimate that the prevalence of pituitary adenomas is approximately 1/1500 persons. Pituitary tumours are usually considered as benign. However, local invasion is reported in 35-40% of pituitary adenomas; resistance to medical treatment or recurrence leading to multimodal therapy is reported in about 15% of cases. These tumours are considered as aggressive pituitary tumours and present a distinct biological and clinical entity with continued growth despite multimodal therapy, including surgery and radiotherapy (McCormack et al., 2011). Whilst these tumours have malignant potential, the term of pituitary carcinoma is strictly reserved for those rare tumours (0.2%) with demonstrated craniospinal or systemic metastases (Heaney, 2011).
Pituitary aggressive and malignant tumours are very difficult to control and ultimately prove to be lethal. It was suggested that early aggressive treatments (chemotherapy, radiotherapy) may control progression and occurrence of metastases. However, these therapeutic options are associated with important side effects limiting their use and the prediction of pituitary tumor behaviour remains a challenge. At the diagnosis, clinical signs are not specific and the results concerning proliferative factors (Ki-67 and P53), putative oncogenes (PTTG) conflict from one series to another.
In a case-control retrospective study of a cohort of 410 patients (HYPOPRONOS), we validated a prognostic pathological classification based on histological and radiological data (J. Trouillas 2012 in preparation). Tumours were classified into 3 grades: grade 1= non-invasive tumour, grade 2= invasive tumour and grade 3 = aggressive-invasive tumor with the combination of radiological signs of invasion and 2 of 3 signs of increased proliferation (Ki-67 index>3%, number of mitoses>2 per 10 fields at 400X, P53 nuclear detection).
It is now widely accepted that cancer is a clonal disease, which arises from a single normal cell and progresses thanks to the accumulation of DNA alterations (Sanson et al., 2011). To identify the role of these DNA alterations, we conducted array CGH analysis limited to 13 prolactin pituitary tumours, from frozen fragments, and identified allelic loss of chromosome 11 associated with aggressiveness and malignancy (Wierinckx et al., 2011).
To confirm these encouraging results we propose to conduct a study on a large series of tumours, fixed and embed, and to be correlated the results to clinical data.
|Study Design:||Observational Model: Case Control
Time Perspective: Retrospective
|Official Title:||Identification of GENEtic Markers of Aggressiveness and Malignancy by Array Comparative Genomic Hybrization Analysis (CGH)|
- DNA alterations associated with the prognosis of pituitary tumours. [ Time Frame: At least 5 years of follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]To identify and quantify the genomic DNA alterations associated with the prognosis of pituitary tumours.
Biospecimen Retention: Samples With DNA
Pituitary tumour DNA may be extracted from frozen or paraffin-embedded tumours.
|Study Start Date:||September 2013|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date:||December 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
Patients cured with no evidence of disease up to 5 years will be the controls.
Patients, in recurrence or progression before 5 years will be the cases
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01903967
|Hospices Civils de Lyon - Groupement Hospitalier Est|
|Lyon, France, 69003|
|Principal Investigator:||Gérald RAVEROT, PhD - MD||Hospices Civils de Lyon|