This site became the new on June 19th. Learn more.
Show more Menu IMPORTANT: Listing of a study on this site does not reflect endorsement by the National Institutes of Health. Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more... Menu IMPORTANT: Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more... Menu
Give us feedback

Metacognitive Therapy Versus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Mixed Anxiety Disorders: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

This study has been completed.
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Modum Bad Identifier:
First received: June 26, 2013
Last updated: March 7, 2016
Last verified: March 2016

Comorbidity is normal in clinical practice. Metacognitive Therapy (MCT) is a transdiagnostic model and could therefore be well suited when it comes to treating patients with high rates of comorbidity. So far, no studies have examined MCT in comparison with the best documented and evidence based treatment, cognitive behavioral treatment(CBT), in a randomized controlled trial consisting of mixed anxiety disorder sample with high degree of comorbidity.

The main aim of this study is to 1) Evaluate the effectiveness of metacognitive therapy in a sample of mixed anxiety disorders as compared to a group receiving existing evidence-based single diagnosis CBT- treatment protocols 2) Investigate patterns and mechanisms of change in the two treatments.

Condition Intervention
Mixed Anxiety Disorders Behavioral: Metacognitive therapy Behavioral: Cognitive behavioral therapy

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Metacognitive Therapy Versus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Mixed Anxiety Disorders: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Resource links provided by NLM:

Further study details as provided by Modum Bad:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV-Lifetime Version [ Time Frame: PRE/POST/1 year follow up ]
    The ADIS -IV is a semistructured diagnostic interview designed to establish reliable DSM-IV anxiety, mood, somatoform and substance disorders. Interviewers assign a 0-8 clinical severity rating (CSR), that indicate their judgement of the degree of distress.

  • Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) [ Time Frame: PRE/POST/weekly and 1 year follow up ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • The Symptom Checklist 90(SCL90; Derogatis et al., 1996) [ Time Frame: Pre/Post/1 year follow up ]
  • The Patient Health Questionnaire depression module (PHQ 9; Spitzer et al., 1999) [ Time Frame: Pre/Post and 1 year follow up ]
  • Metacognitions Questionnaire- 30 (MCQ-30; Wells & Cartwright-Hatton, 2003) [ Time Frame: Pre/Post/weekly and 1 year follow up ]
  • Working Alliance Inventory (WAI; Horwath & Greenberg, 1989) [ Time Frame: Pre/Post/weekly and 1 year follow up ]
  • Cognitive attentional syndrome 1 (CAS1; Wells, 2009) [ Time Frame: Pre/Post/weekly and 1 year follow up ]
  • The Repetitive Thinking Questionnaire(RTQ; McEvoy et al., 2010) [ Time Frame: Pre/Post and 1 year follow up ]
  • PTSD Symptom scale Self Report (PSSR; Foa et al., 1993) [ Time Frame: Pre/Post and 1 year follow up ]
  • Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN; Connor et al., 2000) [ Time Frame: Pre/Post and 1 year follow up ]
  • Mobility inventory (MI; Chambless, 1985) [ Time Frame: Pre/Post and 1 year follow up ]
  • SF 36 [ Time Frame: Pre/Post and 1 year follow up ]
  • The Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ; Meyer, Miller, Metzger & Borkovec, 1990) [ Time Frame: Pre/Post and 1 year follow up ]
  • Youngs Schema Questionnaire YSQ -75 (Young, 1998) [ Time Frame: Pre/Post and 1 year follow up ]
  • The Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP 64 C; Horowitz et al., 1988) [ Time Frame: Pre/Post and 1 year follow up ]
  • Dysfunctional emotion regulations scale (DERS; Graz & Roemer, 2004) [ Time Frame: Pre/Post/ and 1 year follow up ]

Enrollment: 90
Study Start Date: August 2013
Study Completion Date: December 2015
Primary Completion Date: December 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Experimental: Metacognitive therapy
The treatment is based on the generic manual by Wells (2009).
Behavioral: Metacognitive therapy
Active Comparator: Cognitive behavorial therapy
CBT includes the diagnose specific manuals for panic disorder (Clark, 1986), Social Phobia (Clark & Wells, 1995) and PTSD (Foa, 2007).
Behavioral: Cognitive behavioral therapy


Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 65 Years   (Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes

Inclusion Criteria:

  • DSM IV diagnoses of SAD, PD/A or PTSD (CSR>4)
  • Withdraw of all psychotropic medications before treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Psychosis
  • Not willing to accept randomization
  • Comorbid conditions are in immediate need of treatment
  Contacts and Locations
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

Please refer to this study by its identifier: NCT01889342

Modum Bad
Vikersund, Buskerud, Norway, 3370
Sponsors and Collaborators
Modum Bad
Study Chair: Asle Hoffart, Ph.D Modum Bad and University of Oslo
Principal Investigator: Sverre Urnes Johnson, MA Modum Bad and University of Oslo
  More Information

Responsible Party: Modum Bad Identifier: NCT01889342     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: SveJoh 1
Study First Received: June 26, 2013
Last Updated: March 7, 2016

Keywords provided by Modum Bad:
Metacognitive therapy
Anxiety disorders

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Anxiety Disorders
Pathologic Processes
Mental Disorders processed this record on August 17, 2017