ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Straumann Roxolid Multi-Center Study

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01842958
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : April 30, 2013
Results First Posted : February 15, 2018
Last Update Posted : February 15, 2018
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Institut Straumann AG

Brief Summary:
The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate non-inferiority of the Straumann Bone Level Ø 3.3 mm NC SLActive Roxolid Implants compared to Straumann Bone Level Ø 4.1 mm RC SLActive Roxolid Implants based on mean crestal bone level changes measured between surgery and 12 months post-implant placement. The secondary objectives will assess differences in clinical outcomes between the test and control implants, including implant success and survival, gingival recession, subject satisfaction and additional early bone level measurements.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially Device: Straumann Bone Level Implants, 4.1 mm implant diameter Device: Straumann Bone Level Implants, 3.3 mm implant diameter Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

This is a randomized, controlled, multi-center clinical study. The total study duration for each patient should be 12 ± 1 months.

Straumann Bone Level implants will be placed in the pre-molar or anterior region of the mandible or maxilla for single tooth replacement, followed by provisional prosthetic loading after 25 ± 4 days and by final prosthetic loading 6 ± 1 months after implant loading.

In total 6 visits per patient are scheduled in this study. Bone level changes, implant success and survival, gingival recession, subject satisfaction and adverse events (AEs) will be assessed.

The study devices are CE-(Conformité Européenne, meaning European Conformity) marked products. Straumann Bone Level implants Ø 3.3 mm NC SLActive Roxolid and Straumann Bone Level Ø 4.1 mm RC SLActive implants.

Five centers in USA will participate.


Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 50 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Randomized, Controlled, Multi-center Clinical Study Evaluating the Crestal Bone Level Changes of Straumann BL Ø 3.3 mm NC SLActive RXD Implants Compared to Straumann BL Ø 4.1 mm RC SLActive RXD Implants for Single Tooth Replacement.
Study Start Date : March 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date : January 2016
Actual Study Completion Date : March 2016

Arm Intervention/treatment
Active Comparator: 4.1 mm implant diameter
Placement of a Straumann Bone Level Implants, 4.1 mm implant diameter, for single tooth replacement in the anterior and pre-molar region
Device: Straumann Bone Level Implants, 4.1 mm implant diameter
Straumann Bone Level Implants, 4.1 mm implant diameter
Experimental: 3.3 mm implant diameter
Placement of a Straumann Bone Level Implants, 3.3 mm implant diameter, for single tooth replacement in the anterior and pre-molar region
Device: Straumann Bone Level Implants, 3.3 mm implant diameter
Straumann Bone Level Implants, 3.3 mm implant diameter



Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Mean Crestal Bone Level Change [ Time Frame: Baseline (implant placement) and 12 months post loading ]
    Mean crestal bone level change between implant placement and 12 months post loading as determined by radiographic measurement of mesial and distal bone levels following placement of a Straumann Bone Level implant with 3.3 mm diameter versus a Straumann Bone Level implant with 4.1 mm diameter in the anterior or pre-molar region of the mandible or maxilla.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Additional Mean Crestal Bone Level Changes [ Time Frame: Baseline (implant placement), 25 days post implant placement, 6 months post loading, and 12 months post loading ]
    Additional radiographic evaluation of mesial and distal crestal bone level changes between implant placement and at 25 days post post implant placement, 6 months post loading, and 12 months post loading

  2. Implant Success Rate [ Time Frame: 25 days, 6 months post loading, and 12 months post loading ]
    Percentage of participants with successful and non-successful implant (definition of implant success according to Buser et al. 1991: Absence of persistent subjective complaints, such as pain, foreign body sensation and/ or dysesthesia; Absence of a recurrent peri-implant infection with suppuration; Absence of mobility; Absence of a continuous radiolucency around the implant)

  3. Implant Survival Rate [ Time Frame: 7 days, 25 days, 6 months post loading, and 12 months post loading ]
    Percentage of participants with surviving implant (a surviving implant is one that is in place at the time of follow-up)

  4. Gingival Recession [ Time Frame: 6 months to 12 months post loading ]

    Soft tissue measurements include:

    CLI = length of the implant crown from highest point of the soft tissue margin to the incisal edge IPm = distance from the top of the papilla to the incisal edge mesial of the implant crown IPd = distance from the top of the papilla to the incisal edge distal of the implant crown CLTm = length of the crown from highest point of soft tissue margin to the incisal edge of the adjacent mesial tooth CLTd = length of the crown from highest point of soft tissue margin to the incisal edge of the adjacent distal tooth

    Reporting change in soft tissue measurements from 6 months post-loading (final restoration) to 12 months post-loading in millimeters.


  5. Number of Participants With Adverse Events and Adverse Device Effects [ Time Frame: Duration of the study from surgical visit to the 12 months post-loading visit ]
    Adverse events were checked at each study visit at the following time points: Surgical visit, 7 days (post-op), 25 days (implant loading), 6 months post-loading and 12 months post-loading. The incidence of adverse events during the period of the study is reported here, along with the number of adverse events related to device and procedure (includes "possibly related", "probably related" and "related").

  6. Subject Satisfaction [ Time Frame: 12 months post loading ]

    Subject satisfaction will be assessed utilizing Visual Analogs Scales (VAS) for general satisfaction and pain.

    General satisfaction: ranged from 0 (not satisfied) to 100 (highly satisfied) Pain: ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (pain)




Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Ages Eligible for Study:   20 Years and older   (Adult, Senior)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must have voluntarily signed the informed consent form
  • Subjects must be males or females who are a minimum of 20 years of age
  • Subjects must have a single tooth gap in the pre-molar or anterior region of the mandible or maxilla (ADA tooth positions 4-13 and 20-29; FDI tooth positions 11-15, 21-25, 31-35, and 41-45)
  • Subjects must have opposing dentition (natural teeth, fixed or removable restorations)
  • Subjects must have a full mouth plaque score ≤ 25%, according to O'Leary, at the time of screening
  • Subjects must have adequate bone to encapsulate the implant and allow placement of an Ø 4.1 mm Bone Level Implant.
  • Adequate bone height of at least 1 mm longer than the length of the study implant
  • Subjects must have substantially healed (at least 16 weeks after tooth extraction) extraction sockets
  • Subjects must be committed to the study and the required follow-up visits
  • Subjects must be in good general health as assessed by the Investigator

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with a systemic disease that would preclude dental implant surgery (e.g. serious internal medical problems, disorders of bone metabolism, uncontrolled bleeding disorders, weakened immune system, illness requiring periodic use of steroids, uncontrollable endocrine disorders, uncontrolled diabetes)
  • Subjects with any contraindications for oral surgical procedures (e.g. inadequate wound healing capacity, poor oral hygiene, maxillary and mandibular growth not completed, xerostomia)
  • Subjects with mucosal diseases (e.g., erosive lichen planus) in the localized area around the study implant site
  • Subjects with a history of local irradiation therapy in the head/neck area
  • Subjects with any untreated endodontic lesions or untreated periodontal disease adjacent to the implant site
  • Subjects receiving, or having a history of receiving, intravenous or subcutaneous antiresorptive agents, such as bisphosphonates
  • Subjects with severe bruxing, parafunctional habits, or temporomandibular joint dysfunction
  • Subjects with existing implants in the adjacent positions to the planned implant site
  • Subjects requiring bone augmentation or socket grafting within 6 months prior to surgery
  • Subjects requiring more than minimal simultaneous augmentation for minimal buccal dehiscence defects (defect cannot be greater than 3mm in height)
  • Subjects with inadequate oral hygiene or who are unmotivated for adequate home care
  • Subjects who have physical or mental handicaps that would interfere with the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene
  • Subjects who are pregnant or intending to become pregnant during the duration of the study
  • Subjects who are heavy smokers (defined as >10 cigarettes per day or >1 cigar per day) or chew tobacco
  • Subjects who abuse alcohol or drugs
  • Subjects who have undergone administration of any investigational device within 30 days of enrollment in the study
  • Subjects with conditions or circumstances, in the opinion of the Investigator, which would prevent completion of study participation or interfere with analysis of study results, such as history of non-compliance or unreliability

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01842958


Locations
United States, California
UCLA School of Dentistry
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095-1668
United States, Massachusetts
Boston University, School of Dental Medicine
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
United States, New York
New York University College of Dentistry
New York, New York, United States, 10019-5404
United States, Texas
Univeristy of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
United States, Washington
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195-7444
Sponsors and Collaborators
Institut Straumann AG
Investigators
Principal Investigator: David L. Cochran, DDS, MS, PhD University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio

Responsible Party: Institut Straumann AG
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01842958     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: CR 10/09
First Posted: April 30, 2013    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: February 15, 2018
Last Update Posted: February 15, 2018
Last Verified: January 2018
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No

Keywords provided by Institut Straumann AG:
Dental Implant

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Jaw, Edentulous
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
Jaw Diseases
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Stomatognathic Diseases
Mouth, Edentulous
Mouth Diseases
Tooth Diseases