We updated the design of this site on December 18, 2017. Learn more.
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu
IMPORTANT: Due to the lapse in government funding, the information on this web site may not be up to date, transactions submitted via the web site may not be processed, and the agency may not be able to respond to inquiries until appropriations are enacted. Updates regarding government operating status and resumption of normal operations can be found at opm.gov.

Probability Ramp Control of Propofol for EGD

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01838304
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : April 24, 2013
Last Update Posted : May 23, 2013
Information provided by (Responsible Party):

Study Description
Brief Summary:
Endoscopic sedation requires titration of propofol to deep sedation without minimum overshoot into general anesthesia. This skill is demanding and acquired slowly. Probability Ramp Control (PRC) simplifies this by providing the clinician with a simple infusion sequence that permits gradual titration of propofol. The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of this technology to that of experienced anesthesia providers in endoscopic sedation.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment
Gastrointestinal Disease Device: Probability ramp control Device: Monitoring

Detailed Description:

Administration of propofol to achieve a target of moderate sedation is a challenging task for which anesthesia providers receive minimal training. Undersedation results in a noncompliant patient, while oversedation results in airway obstruction, respiratory depression, and hypotension. Considerable variability in patient pharmacokinetics (the distribution of drug within the body) and pharmacodynamics (the translation of drug concentration to clinical effect) has been demonstrated. The skill of titrating propofol to the desired target and maintaining this state is slowly acquired in the clinical environment of the endoscopy center with frequent reliance on rescue skills. An automated system that facilitates this process would be useful.

Pharmacokinetic models allow us to make predictions of the results of drug administration. If we know the age and size of the patient, we can determine a quantity of propofol that will attain a desired concentration at some point in the future (within the predictive accuracy of the model). If they are old, this is less than if they are young. If they are obese, this is more than if they are thin. By adjusting the dosing, we can achieve similar concentrations at a specified time in a wide range of patients.

Pharmacodynamic models allow us to relate drug concentration to a probability of response. Sensitivity is a randomly distributed variable, and the cumulative probability of response to propofol is well represented by a sigmoid curve. While we do not know the concentration that will suffice for a given individual, we can determine the probability that this individual will lose responsiveness within an interval of concentrations. For example, the probability of loss of responsiveness between 1 µg/ml and 6 µg/ml is around 99%. For any given age and size, an infusion sequence can be determined so that we traverse this interval smoothly. The infusion sequence is determined by minimization of the difference between the simulated probability and the target (1). We predict that 90% of 50 year old 70 kg patients will lose responsiveness between one minute and three minutes after initiating the infusion, and 99% by five minutes. The infusion sequence for this patient is comprised of a bolus of 287 µg/kg followed by an initial infusion of 216 µg/kg/min, with an increase to 550 µg/kg/min after 147 seconds. By selecting the infusion sequence based on the age and size of the patient, all patients will track the same target line. These infusion rates are determined prior to initiation of sedation, and the clinician can verify that they are appropriate for the patient before beginning sedation.

Once the endpoint of adequate sedation is observed, the effect site concentration associated with this endpoint is inferred, and the infusion that will maintain this concentration can be determined. This allows the clinical observation to be translated into an infusion rate, much as a driver accelerates to a desired speed and then engages the cruise control to maintain that speed.

The intent of this study is to demonstrate equivalent safety and efficacy of PRC to control by a skilled clinician.


1. Mandel JE, Sarraf E. The Variability of Response to Propofol Is Reduced When a Clinical Observation Is Incorporated in the Control: A Simulation Study. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2012;114:1221-9.

Study Design

Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 40 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Depth of Sedation With Propofol Titrated by Probability Ramp Control to Control by Anesthesia Providers During Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD)
Study Start Date : March 2013
Primary Completion Date : May 2013
Study Completion Date : May 2013

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

Drug Information available for: Propofol
U.S. FDA Resources

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/treatment
Active Comparator: Monitoring
Standard of care sedation by CRNA using proposal with manual recording of drug dosing
Device: Monitoring
Manual recording of drug doses determined by CRNA
Other Name: Manual recording of drug doses determined by CRNA
Experimental: Probability ramp control
Propofol titrated to deep sedation using PRC software.
Device: Probability ramp control
Decision support software that calculates propofol doses appropriate for age and weight of the patient

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Depth of sedation, as assessed by SEDLine processed EEG. [ Time Frame: Intraprocedure ]
    SEDLine® is a device that analyzes the electroencephalogram (EEG) with a proprietary algorithm and produces a number between zero and 100 that is related to the depth of anesthesia.

Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Predicted effect site concentrations for propofol [ Time Frame: Intraprocedure ]
  2. Minute ventilation, as assessed by calibrated RIP [ Time Frame: Intraprocedure ]
    Respiratory Inductance Plethysmography (RIP) utilizes fabric bands with a coil that is energized with an alternating current. The magnetic inductance is related to the area enclosed by the coil, which is proportional to lung volume. By calibration against a spirometer, continuous estimates of minute ventilation can be made.

  3. Hemoglobin saturation, as assessed by pulse oximetry [ Time Frame: Intraprocedure ]
  4. Endoscopist satisfaction, as assessed by 10 point Likert scale [ Time Frame: At completion of the procedure ]
  5. Patient Satisfaction by 10 point Likert scale [ Time Frame: Prior to discharge from endoscopy suite, typically 30 minutes ]
    Patient satisfaction with sedation experience

Eligibility Criteria

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Senior)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No

Inclusion Criteria:

  • scheduled for elective EGD

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to provide informed consent
Contacts and Locations

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01838304

United States, Pennsylvania
Endoscopy Center, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
Sponsors and Collaborators
University of Pennsylvania
Principal Investigator: Jeff E Mandel, MD MS University of Pennsylvania
More Information

Responsible Party: University of Pennsylvania
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01838304     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 817166
First Posted: April 24, 2013    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: May 23, 2013
Last Verified: March 2013

Keywords provided by University of Pennsylvania:
propofol sedation endoscopy

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Gastrointestinal Diseases
Digestive System Diseases
Hypnotics and Sedatives
Central Nervous System Depressants
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Anesthetics, Intravenous
Anesthetics, General