Evaluation of Immunological Changes and Clinical Efficacy of Specific Immunotherapy With Der p House Dust Mite Allergen in Polysensitized and Monosensitized Patients With Allergic Rhinitis and/or Asthma.
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01795846|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified February 2013 by Betul Ayse Sin, Ankara University.
Recruitment status was: Not yet recruiting
First Posted : February 21, 2013
Last Update Posted : March 1, 2013
The incidence of allergic rhinitis and asthma is increasing in throughout the world as well as our country. Allergen-specific immunotherapy has been in use for almost 100 years. Since then, it is recommended for the management of Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergic diseases as the only immune modulator therapeutic tool. It is well documented that allergen immunotherapy performed using single allergen is efficacious in monosensitized patients. Hence, polysensitization is much more prevalent than monosensitization in patients with respiratory allergy. On the other hand, polysensitization may have a paramount relevance in clinical practice; for example, many allergists have doubts in choosing the allergen extract for allergen specific immunotherapy. In this regard, the evaluation of immunotherapy efficacy in polysensitized patients still represents an unanswered question and there are very few studies on this issue. However, most clinical trials of allergen immunotherapy have been performed with multiple different allergen extracts using sublingual route. To the best of our knowledge, no common single-allergen (house dust mite Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Der p) subcutaneous immunotherapy trials have been specifically designed to compare efficacy in monosensitized and polysensitized patients. Furthermore, few studies have demonstrated that monosensitized and polysensitized patients appear to differ in terms of their immune reactivity. But, it is unknown whether single-allergen immunotherapy protocol elicit distinct immune responses in monosensitized and polysensitized patients.
The aim of this study was to investigate the immunological changes and clinical effectiveness of most relevant single-allergen immunotherapy in patients with allergic rhinitis and/or asthma. The study population will included 40 adult patients with moderate/severe perennial allergic rhinitis and mild/moderate asthma who were monosensitized to house dust mites or sensitized to at least 2 different allergens including house dust mites. No patient will previously had been performed allergen immunotherapy. The study plan is prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled. Both groups will first received placebo injections for 3 months, and followed by a cluster immunotherapy schedule. After the maintenance dose will be reached within 6 weeks, injections will be received at monthly intervals. Standardized depot preparations of Der p extract (Alutard Standard Quality SQ, ALK-Abello (Company Name), Madrid, Spain ) were administered by means of subcutaneous injection. All eligible patients will underwent 8 weeks run-in period to evaluate their baseline clinical status based on history of allergy, symptom and medication usage for rhinitis and asthma, skin prick testing, pulmonary function tests and methacholine bronchoprovocation tests. According to the sensitizations, patients will be divided to 2 parallel groups either as polysensitized or monosensitized. Afterwards, both patient groups will be followed by symptom and medication scales, visual analog scores, quality-of-life scores for 1 month before placebo and immunotherapy. During this period, total serum IgE, specific IgE levels will be measured using the method of UNI-CAP 100 (Phadia, Uppsala, Sweden) and repeated after placebo and immunotherapy injections. At baseline, after placebo (3 months) and immunotherapy injections (at third months of maintenance period), nasal allergen provocation test with Der p extract will applied to the study groups. Peripheral whole blood will drawn for the analysis of basophil activation marker CD203c (CD, cell differentiation) expression at this three time points. For the clinical assessment, all patients will record on diary cards their symptom scores, visual analog scale scores, medication usage, quality-of-life measures for rhinitis and asthma. On each clinical visit, physical examination and side effects will be collected from diary card data. In conclusion, we believe that this study may be help for more understanding of the immune response to allergen specific immunotherapy at early stage. On the other hand, if the similar clinical improvement is demonstrated between the two groups with common single-allergen (Der p) immunotherapy, unnecessary usage of multiple allergens may be prevented as well as therapeutic side affects and cost.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment|
|Allergen Immunotherapy, Immunological Mechanisms,Monosensitized,Polysensitized,Clinical Efficacy||Other: Allergen specific immunotherapy and placebo injections|
|Study Type :||Observational [Patient Registry]|
|Estimated Enrollment :||40 participants|
|Target Follow-Up Duration:||3 Months|
|Study Start Date :||March 2013|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||January 2014|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||March 2014|
monosensitized allergic rhinitis, asthma
adult patients with moderate/severe perennial allergic rhinitis and mild/moderate asthma who were monosensitized to house dust mites
Other: Allergen specific immunotherapy and placebo injections
polysensitized allergic rhinitis, asthma
adult patients with moderate/severe perennial allergic rhinitis and mild/moderate asthma who were monosensitized to house dust mites or sensitized to at least 2 different allergens including house dust mites.
Other: Allergen specific immunotherapy and placebo injections
- Primary outcome is the assessment data from all patients whom will record on diary cards their symptom scores, visual analog scale scores, medication usage, quality-of-life measures for rhinitis and asthma. [ Time Frame: 1 year ]
- Secondary outcome is the significant changes in total serum IgE, specific IgE levels, basophil activation marker CD203c expression, and nasal allergen provocation tests obtained from all patients during the study period. [ Time Frame: 1 year ]
- Measurement of the levels of specific Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)blocking antibodies. [ Time Frame: 1 year ]
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01795846
|Ankara University, Faculty of Medicine||Not yet recruiting|
|Ankara, Turkey, 06100|
|Contact: Sadan Soyyigit, M.D. 0-90-312 595 65 83 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Sub-Investigator: Sadan Soyyigit, M.D.|