Diagnosis of Urethral Stricture With Sono-urethrography vs Conventional Urethrography (SONO-URETHRA) (SONO-URETHRA)
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01790776|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified June 2015 by University Hospital, Ghent.
Recruitment status was: Recruiting
First Posted : February 13, 2013
Last Update Posted : June 3, 2015
Conventional urethrography is the standard diagnostic evaluation for patients with a suspicion of urethral stricture. The radiation dose of this examination is 5-9 mSV. Sono-urethrography was introduced in 1988 (McAninch et al. , J Urol 1988); the diagnostic accuracy of sono-urethrography is equal compared to conventional urethrography, with even a better measurement of stricture length and degree of spongiofibrosis with sono-urethrography. However, sono-urethrography remained underused among urologists and radiologists.
Patients will be randomly assigned into two groups:
Group A: conventional urethrography Group B: sono-urethrography In case sono-urethrography is inconclusive or of poor quality, a conventional urethrography will be performed.
The radiation dose in the two groups will be measured. The stricture length and location will be recorded and compared with the perioperative findings in order to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy. The complications of the procedure(s) will be recorded with a questionnaire directly after and two weeks after the conventional or sono-urethrography.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Urethral Stricture Disease||Radiation: Urografin 30% Radiation: NaCl 0,9 % in aqua||Phase 3|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||150 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||Diagnosis of Urethral Stricture With Sono-urethrography vs Conventional Urethrography: Evaluation of the Diagnostic Value and Evaluation of the Reduction of the Radiation Dose With Sono-urethrography (SONO-URETHRA)|
|Study Start Date :||February 2013|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||December 2015|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||December 2015|
Active Comparator: Conventional urethrography
Current golden standard.
Radiation: Urografin 30%
Urografin 30% (Natrium amidotrizoas 10G, Megalumin, Amidotrizoas 65G, Natrii calcii edetas, water for injection 250 ml, with 146 mg iodium/ml).
The tip of a bladder catheter is placed at the external urethral meatus and fixed at this location. The solution (urografin 30 %) is instilled.
Experimental urethrography, which could be followed by conventional urethrography if the results are inconclusive.
Radiation: NaCl 0,9 % in aqua
The tip of a bladder catheter is placed at the external urethral meatus and fixed at this location. The solution (NaCl 0,9 % in aqua) is instilled. If the result is inconclusive, urografin 30 % will be instilled.
- Radiation dose during diagnostic intervention. [ Time Frame: During urethrography. ]The radiation dose will be measured with a dosimeter.
- Diagnostic accuracy of sono-urethrography vs conventional urethrography. [ Time Frame: Immediately and 2 weeks after urethrography ]The results of sono-urethrography and conventional urethrography will be compared with the intraoperative situation (place stricture, length stricture); contrast allergy and complications are scored with a questionnaire.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01790776
|Contact: Nicolaas Lumen, M.D., Ph.D.||Nicolaas.Lument@uzgent.be|
|Ghent University Hospital||Recruiting|
|Ghent, Belgium, 9000|
|Contact: Nicolaas Lumen, M.D., Ph.D. Nicolaas.Lumen@uzgent.be|
|Principal Investigator: Nicolaas Lumen, M.D., Ph.D.|
|Principal Investigator:||Nicolaas Lumen, M.D., Ph.D.||University Hospital, Ghent|