IMPORTANT: Listing of a study on this site does not reflect endorsement by the National Institutes of Health. Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. 
Validating Machine -Learned Classifiers of Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity (iWatch)
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
University of California, San Diego
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Jacqueline Kerr, University of California, San Diego
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01775826
First received: January 17, 2013
Last updated: May 11, 2016
Last verified: May 2016
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The majority of the US population spends most of the day sitting and the we have new scientific evidence that this can contribute to poor health regardless of how much physical activity a person does. However, we do not measure sitting time very accurately and when we ask people to tell us how much they do, their answers are unreliable. Our study will use small sensors to objectively measure when people sit or do physical activity, and we will use sophisticated computational techniques to summarize these movement patterns.
| Condition |
|---|
| Physical Activity Sedentary Lifestyle |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Study Design: | Observational Model: Cohort Time Perspective: Cross-Sectional |
| Official Title: | Validating Machine -Learned Classifiers of Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by Jacqueline Kerr, University of California, San Diego:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- physical activity behavior classification using study sensors (accelerometers, Sensecam and GPS) [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
Using an annotated data set of SenseCam images in three free-living population subgroups, we will compare sensitivity, specificity and percent agreement between behavioral classifiers derived from: (a) single axis vs. multi axis accelerometers; (b) aggregated movement counts vs. raw acceleration data; (c) hip vs. wrist mounted accelerometers.
Determine (a) the extent to which adding GPS data improves discrimination accuracy over accelerometer only behavior classification (i.e., best classifier resulting from Aim 1); and (b) the extent to which adding GIS data improves discrimination accuracy over accelerometer and GPS behavior classification alone (i.e., best classifier resulting from Aim 2a).
| Enrollment: | 225 |
| Study Start Date: | March 2013 |
| Study Completion Date: | April 2016 |
| Primary Completion Date: | April 2016 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Groups/Cohorts |
|---|
|
Child and adolescent
6-17 years of age
|
|
Adult
18-55 years of age
|
|
Older adults
65-85 years of age
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 6 Years to 85 Years (Child, Adult, Senior) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
| Sampling Method: | Non-Probability Sample |
Study Population
We will recruit 210 volunteer participants over a 2-yr period. Fifty percent of the sample will be women, and we will quota sample three specific age groups: 6-10 year olds (n = 70); 16-55 year olds (n=70); and 65-85 year olds (n= 70).
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria for participants 6-17 yr olds:
- provide written parental consent to complete study protocols;
- provide verbal assent to complete study protocols;
- willingness to complete 2 visits to UCSD offices;
- willingness to wear multiple sensor devices on 7 days for 12 hours per day;
- willingness to wear wrist accelerometer on 7 days for 24 hours per day;
- willingness to have their height and weight measured;
- be able to walk unassisted
- able to read and understand study materials in English.
Inclusion Criteria for participants 18-55 yr old:
- provide written consent to complete study protocols;
- willingness to complete 2 visits to UCSD offices;
- willingness to wear multiple sensor devices on 7 days for 12 hours per day;
- willingness to wear wrist accelerometer on 7 days for 24 hours per day;
- complete a survey assessing their demographic characteristics;
- willingness to have their height and weight measured;
- be physically and cognitively able to walk unassisted,
- able to read and understand study materials in English.
Inclusion Criteria for participants 65-85 yr olds:
- provide written consent to complete study protocols;
- correctly answer verbal questions about their comprehension of the informed consent;
- willingness to complete 2 visits to UCSD offices;
- willingness to wear multiple sensor devices on 7 days for 12 hours per day;
- willingness to wear wrist accelerometer on 7 days for 24 hours per day;
- complete a survey assessing their demographic;
- willingness to have their height and weight measured;
- be physically and cognitively able to walk without the assistance of another person (walking aids are permitted)
- able to read and understand study materials in English.
Exclusion Criteria:
- unable to ambulate;
- attends a workplace or school on monitoring days that prohibits static images being taken by a SenseCam worn around the neck of the participant;
- pregnancy in second or third trimester.
Contacts and Locations
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below.
For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01775826
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01775826
Locations
| United States, California | |
| UCSD | |
| La Jolla, California, United States, 92093 | |
Sponsors and Collaborators
University of California, San Diego
More Information
Publications:
Moghimi, Mohammad**; Kerr, Jacqueline; Johnson, Eileen; Godbole, Suneeta; Belongie, Serge Discriminative Regions: A Substrate for Analyzing Life-Logging Image Sequences MultiMedia Modeling 2015 357-368.
Jacqueline Kerr, Ruth E. Patterson, Katherine Ellis, Suneeta Godbole, Eileen Johnson, Gert Lanckriet, John Staudenmayer. Objective Assessment of Walking and Sitting: New behavior classifiers for Public Health. MSSE 2015, in press.
| Responsible Party: | Jacqueline Kerr, Assistant Professor, University of California, San Diego |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01775826 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
1R01CA164993-01A1 ( US NIH Grant/Contract Award Number ) |
| Study First Received: | January 17, 2013 |
| Last Updated: | May 11, 2016 |
Keywords provided by Jacqueline Kerr, University of California, San Diego:
|
physical activity sedentary behavior accelerometer |
GPS GIS machine learning |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 26, 2017