We're building a better ClinicalTrials.gov. Check it out and tell us what you think!
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Unimalleolar Versus Bimalleolar Fixation in Bi- or Trimalleolar Ankle Fracture

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01757951
Recruitment Status : Suspended (Partly due to financial issues and changes in study staff work placements)
First Posted : December 31, 2012
Last Update Posted : November 2, 2022
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Harri Pakarinen, University of Oulu

Brief Summary:
A one third of all ankle fractures are bi- or trimalleolar. Traditionally these fractures are treated by both medial and lateral osteosynthesis, sometimes accompanied by osteosynthesis of the posterior malleolus. There is significant evidence that fractures of the lateral malleolus can be treated conservatively if the medial side is stable. However, there isn't a single study comparing standard bi- or trimalleolar fixation with only medial side osteosynthesis and postoperative immobilization with a cast.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Trauma Procedure: Unimalleolar fixation Procedure: Bimalleolar fixation Not Applicable

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 126 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Unimalleolar Versus Bimalleolar Fixation in Bi- or Trimalleolar Ankle Fracture - A Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Start Date : February 2012
Estimated Primary Completion Date : December 2024
Estimated Study Completion Date : December 2026

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Unimalleolar Fixation
Medial malleolus is fixed first and after that ankle mortise stability is assessed using external-rotation stress test. If talocrural joint is stable after fixation of medial malleolus, the patient is randomized to unimalleolar fixation group and no fixation of the lateral side is performed.
Procedure: Unimalleolar fixation
Medial malleolus is fixed first and after that ankle mortise stability is assessed using external-rotation stress test. If talocrural joint is stable after fixation of medial malleolus, the patient is randomized to unimalleolar fixation group and no fixation of the lateral side is performed.

Active Comparator: Bimalleolar Fixation
Medial malleolus is fixed first and after that ankle mortise stability is assessed using external-rotation stress test. If talocrural joint is stable after fixation of medial malleolus, the patient is randomized to bimalleolar fixation group i.e. additional fixation of the lateral malleolus fracture is performed.
Procedure: Bimalleolar fixation
Medial malleolus is fixed first and after that ankle mortise stability is assessed using external-rotation stress test. If talocrural joint is stable after fixation of medial malleolus, the patient is randomized to bimalleolar fixation group i.e. additional fixation of the lateral malleolus fracture is performed.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Olerud-Molander Ankle Score [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
    A validated, condition-specific, patient-reported measure of ankle fracture symptoms. Range from 0 to 100 points, with higher scores indicating better function


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
    FAOS, 5 subscales from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better function

  2. A 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale for function and pain (VAS) [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
    Range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more severe pain

  3. The RAND 36-Item Health Survey for health-related quality-of-life (RAND-36) [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
    8 subscales from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life

  4. Talocrural joint congruence [ Time Frame: At two, four and 12 weeks, and at 2 years ]
    Medial clear space < 4 mm and ≤ 1 mm wider than the superior clear space as measured between the lateral border of the medial malleolus and the medial border of the talus at the level of the talar dome.

  5. Fracture healing [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
    Fracture union is considered complete when the fracture line disappeared and conversely, those fractures with a visible fracture line are deemed non-unions.


Other Outcome Measures:
  1. Complications and Harms [ Time Frame: At two, four and 12 weeks, and at 2 years ]
    Treatment related complications and harms (i.e. wound infection, re-operations, deep vein trombhosis, plaster sore, wound healing problems)



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   16 Years and older   (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Weber B bi- or trimalleolar ankle fracture (fracture of the lateral and medial malleolus +/- posterior malleolus sized under 30% of the distal tibia joint line measured from the lateral projection of the standard ankle radiographs)
  • Age: 16 years or older
  • Voluntary
  • Operated within 7 days of the trauma
  • Able to walk unaided before the current trauma

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Peripheral neuropathy
  • Pilon fracture
  • Bilateral ankle fracture
  • Concomitant tibial fracture
  • Pathological fracture
  • Active infection around the ankle
  • A previous ankle fracture on either side
  • In trimalleolar fractures, posterior malleolus fracture sized over 30% of the distal tibia joint line measured from the lateral projection of the standard ankle radiographs
  • Inadequate co-operation
  • Permanent residence outside the catchment area of the study hospital

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01757951


Locations
Layout table for location information
Finland
Oulu University Hospital
Oulu, Finland, 90029
Sponsors and Collaborators
University of Oulu
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Director: Harri J Pakarinen, MD, PhD, AP Pohjois-Pohjanmaan sairaanhoitopiiri
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Harri Pakarinen, MD, PhD, University of Oulu
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01757951    
Other Study ID Numbers: OYSnilkka-RCT4
First Posted: December 31, 2012    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: November 2, 2022
Last Verified: November 2022
Keywords provided by Harri Pakarinen, University of Oulu:
Ankle
Fracture
medial malleolus
Osteosynthesis
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Ankle Fractures
Fractures, Bone
Wounds and Injuries