Intensive Rehabilitation in Peripheral Arterial Disease With Claudication: Effects of a Treadmill Training With Active Recovery (ARTEX)

This study has been completed.

Sponsor:

Information provided by (Responsible Party):

University Hospital, Grenoble

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:

NCT01734603

First received: November 21, 2012

Last updated: June 24, 2015

Last verified: June 2015

History of Changes

Purpose

Rehabilitation is the first intention treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) with claudication. Initially proposed in the sixty's, rehabilitation programs dedicated to patients with PAD have recently been proved effective and defined in many guidelines. Supervised walking training on treadmill is recommended. Usually patients walk up to a mild or moderate pain (evaluated at 3 or 4 on the claudication pain scale; maximum pain =5), then stop until pain completely subsides and walk again .

The Artex study assesses the efficacy of a fractionated mode of training avoiding pain by alternating short sequences of intensive training and active recovery (without rest).

Condition	Intervention	Phase
Peripheral Arterial Disease Claudication	Procedure: experimental rehabilitation program Procedure: conventional rehabilitation program	Phase 3


Study Type:	Interventional
Study Design:	Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title:	Randomized, Monocentric and Multidisciplinary Study of the Effects of an Intensive Rehabilitation by Interval Training With Active Recovery in Peripheral Arterial Disease With Claudication

Resource links provided by NLM:

MedlinePlus related topics: Peripheral Arterial Disease Rehabilitation

U.S. FDA Resources

Further study details as provided by University Hospital, Grenoble:

Primary Outcome Measures:

Intensive Rehabilitation in Peripheral Arterial Disease with Claudication: effects of a treadmill training with active recovery [ Time Frame: Between day 0 and day 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Change in walking distance between day 0 and day 28, measured on a graded treadmill test

Secondary Outcome Measures:

Determine vascular and respiratory parameters which participate to improve the walking abilities after rehabilitation. [ Time Frame: Between day 0 and day 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Change in walking distance between day 0 and day 28, measured with the 6 MWT and the Strandness test.
- Measure of ABI(Ankle-to- Brachial systolic blood pressure Index) and recovery time
- Measure of the transcutaneous oxygen pression
- Measure of the maximal cardiac frequency
- Measure of peak oxygen consumption and lactatemy
Determine vascular and respiratory parameters which participate to improve the walking abilities after rehabilitation. [ Time Frame: Between day 0 and day 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Measure of ABI(Ankle-to- Brachial systolic blood pressure Index) and recovery time
- Measure of the transcutaneous oxygen pression
- Measure of the maximal cardiac frequency
- Measure of peak oxygen consumption and lactatemy
One year follow-up [ Time Frame: one year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
All patients included are invited to be assessed at a one year. Interview, Clinical Examination, and Assessemnts are performed in day hospital (half a day).

Criteria are:

Patients 'satisfaction about protocole using an ad hoc ordinal scale Medical and duplex scan examinations Vascular risk factors and comorbidities Occurence of any medical event during the year Changes in WIQ and HADS changes in walking distance at the Graduated Treadmill Test.
Reproducibility test of the walking graduated treadmill [ Time Frame: Day 0 et day 1 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
The fifteen last patients are invited to perform the consecutive graduated treadmill test on day 0 et day 1. Reproducibility of the walking distance assess by this novel test is quantified.

Other Outcome Measures:

Handicap and Depression measures [ Time Frame: Between day 0 and day 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Walking Impairment Questionary WIQ
- Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale HADS


Enrollment:	40
Study Start Date:	October 2011
Study Completion Date:	September 2014
Primary Completion Date:	May 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Arms	Assigned Interventions
Active Comparator: conventional rehabilitation program conventional rehabilitation program 20 patients are expected in this arm. Patients perform walking treadmill exercises with complete rest.	Procedure: conventional rehabilitation program Duration of the training 40 minutes (time excluding rest and warm up) Initial intensity = 3.2 km per hour and slope at 0% Walking until pain 3/5, then stop until pain completely subsides.Resume of walking as soon as possible. Increase : Week 1: if the walking is possible during 8 minutes, increase of the slope of 0.5% in each training until 10% Week 2 :if the walking is possible during 8 minutes, increase of the speed 0.2 mile per hour until 3 mph Week 3 :if the walking is possible during 8 minutes, increase of the slope 2% at each training until 15% Week 4 : if the walking is possible during 8 minutes, increase the speed 0.2mph at each training as long as it is possible.
Experimental: experimental rehabilitation program experimental rehabilitation program 20 patients are expected in this arm. Patients perform walking treadmill exercises with active recovery (no stop walking).	Procedure: experimental rehabilitation program Duration training = 40 min : 5 cycles of 6 min each Week 1 speed of the walking exercise fixed at 70% of the max walking test's speed done on the initial walking test speed of the walking recovery fixed at 40% Walking slope : 0% Increase of the speed = 0.1 km/h after each training without pain. Week 2 Walking speed = average of the walking speeds done on week 1 Walking slope = 1% Recovery slope = 0% Increase of the slope = 0.5% after each training without pain. Week 3 Walking speed = 70% of the maximal walking test's speed Recovery speed = 40 % of the maximal walking test's speed Slope = average of the slopes done on week 2 Increase of the speed = 0.1 km/h . Week 4 Speeds = average of the walking speeds done on week 3 Walking slope = 1% Recovery slope = 0% Increase of the slope is 0.5% .

Arms

Assigned Interventions

Active Comparator: conventional rehabilitation program

conventional rehabilitation program 20 patients are expected in this arm. Patients perform walking treadmill exercises with complete rest.

Procedure: conventional rehabilitation program

Duration of the training 40 minutes (time excluding rest and warm up)

Initial intensity = 3.2 km per hour and slope at 0% Walking until pain 3/5, then stop until pain completely subsides.Resume of walking as soon as possible.

Increase :

Week 1: if the walking is possible during 8 minutes, increase of the slope of 0.5% in each training until 10% Week 2 :if the walking is possible during 8 minutes, increase of the speed 0.2 mile per hour until 3 mph Week 3 :if the walking is possible during 8 minutes, increase of the slope 2% at each training until 15% Week 4 : if the walking is possible during 8 minutes, increase the speed 0.2mph at each training as long as it is possible.

Experimental: experimental rehabilitation program

experimental rehabilitation program 20 patients are expected in this arm. Patients perform walking treadmill exercises with active recovery (no stop walking).

Procedure: experimental rehabilitation program

Duration training = 40 min : 5 cycles of 6 min each Week 1 speed of the walking exercise fixed at 70% of the max walking test's speed done on the initial walking test speed of the walking recovery fixed at 40% Walking slope : 0% Increase of the speed = 0.1 km/h after each training without pain.

Week 2 Walking speed = average of the walking speeds done on week 1 Walking slope = 1% Recovery slope = 0% Increase of the slope = 0.5% after each training without pain.
Week 3 Walking speed = 70% of the maximal walking test's speed Recovery speed = 40 % of the maximal walking test's speed Slope = average of the slopes done on week 2 Increase of the speed = 0.1 km/h .
Week 4 Speeds = average of the walking speeds done on week 3 Walking slope = 1% Recovery slope = 0% Increase of the slope is 0.5% .

Detailed Description:

Fractionated mode of training with active recovery has been proved effective in sport training as well as in Cardiac rehabilitation. We hypothesized it might be also interesting in the rehabilitation of patients with a peripheral arterial disease. The active recovery period might magnified the beneficial effect of a short intensive training.

Eligibility


Ages Eligible for Study:	18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Senior)
Genders Eligible for Study:	Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:	No

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Patient (male/female) between 18 and 80 years
Patient with Fontaine stage II PAD confirmed by clinic, duplex ultrasound and ankle-to-brachial systolic blood pressure index
Cardiac status compatible with an intensive gait rehabilitation (checked by a consultation with a cardiologist, including interview, clinical examination, electrocardiograph, and effort test on ergocycle).
Volunteer to take part in the study, having sign the consent form after receiving sufficient information and the information leaflet
Person affiliated to social security or the recipient of a similar scheme

Not Inclusion Criteria:

Exercise tolerance limited by other factors than claudication (eg, coronary artery disease, dyspnea, poorly controlled blood pressure
walking limited by other pathology
osteoarticular lower limbs pathology
abdominal aortic aneurysm > 4 cm
pseudo-flu-like feverish syndromes in evolution (myocarditis or pericarditis)
Person deprived of liberty by a legal or administrative decision, person under legal protection
Person currently participating in a clinical trial or having taken part in a clinical trial in the month preceding inclusion
Patient presenting with a history of mental or psychiatric illness or any other factor restricting his/her ability to participate in an informed manner and in compliance with the protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

Impossibility to perform protocol whatever reason

Contacts and Locations

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01734603

Locations


France
CHU Grenoble - Hôpital Sud - Clinique médecine physique de rééducation
Echirolles, France, 38434

Sponsors and Collaborators

University Hospital, Grenoble

Investigators


Principal Investigator:	Béatrice VILLEMUR, MD	Unité de rééducation vasculaire - Clinique médecine physique de rééducation - CHU Grenoble - Hôpital Sud
Study Chair:	Dominic Perennou, MD, PhD	Rehabilitation Department, Universitary Hospital Grenoble

More Information

Publications:

Villemur B, Marquer A, Gailledrat E, Benetreau C, Bucci B, Evra V, Rabeau V, De Angelis MP, Bouchet JY, Carpentier P, Pérennou D. New rehabilitation program for intermittent claudication: Interval training with active recovery: pilot study. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2011 Jul;54(5):275-81. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 Jun 12. English, French.

Tisi PV, Hulse M, Chulakadabba A, Gosling P, Shearman CP. Exercise training for intermittent claudication: does it adversely affect biochemical markers of the exercise-induced inflammatory response? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1997 Nov;14(5):344-50.

Strandness DE Jr. Exercise testing in the evaluation of patients undergoint direct arterial surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1970 May-Jun;11(3):192-200.

Spinhoven P, Ormel J, Sloekers PP, Kempen GI, Speckens AE, Van Hemert AM. A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects. Psychol Med. 1997 Mar;27(2):363-70.

Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety And Depression Scale. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Aug 1;1:29.

Nicolaï SP, Viechtbauer W, Kruidenier LM, Candel MJ, Prins MH, Teijink JA. Reliability of treadmill testing in peripheral arterial disease: a meta-regression analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2009 Aug;50(2):322-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.01.042.

Meijer WT, Hoes AW, Rutgers D, Bots ML, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. Peripheral arterial disease in the elderly: The Rotterdam Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998 Feb;18(2):185-92.

McDermott MM, Ades P, Guralnik JM, Dyer A, Ferrucci L, Liu K, Nelson M, Lloyd-Jones D, Van Horn L, Garside D, Kibbe M, Domanchuk K, Stein JH, Liao Y, Tao H, Green D, Pearce WH, Schneider JR, McPherson D, Laing ST, McCarthy WJ, Shroff A, Criqui MH. Treadmill exercise and resistance training in patients with peripheral arterial disease with and without intermittent claudication: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009 Jan 14;301(2):165-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.962. Erratum in: JAMA. 2012 Apr 25;307(16):1694.

Le Faucheur A, Abraham P, Jaquinandi V, Bouyé P, Saumet JL, Noury-Desvaux B. Measurement of walking distance and speed in patients with peripheral arterial disease: a novel method using a global positioning system. Circulation. 2008 Feb 19;117(7):897-904. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.725994. Epub 2008 Feb 4.

Lechat P, Priollet P. [Prevention of major ischemic events in lower limb arterial disease: does aspirin play a role?]. J Mal Vasc. 2006 Jul;31(3):129-34. French.

Kruidenier LM, Nicolaï SP, Hendriks EJ, Bollen EC, Prins MH, Teijink JA. Supervised exercise therapy for intermittent claudication in daily practice. J Vasc Surg. 2009 Feb;49(2):363-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.09.042. Epub 2008 Nov 22.

Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, Bakal CW, Creager MA, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Murphy WR, Olin JW, Puschett JB, Rosenfield KA, Sacks D, Stanley JC, Taylor LM Jr, White CJ, White J, White RA, Antman EM, Smith SC Jr, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Gibbons RJ, Hunt SA, Jacobs AK, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B; American Association for Vascular Surgery; Society for Vascular Surgery; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology; Society of Interventional Radiology; ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease; American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; Vascular Disease Foundation. ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease): endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation. Circulation. 2006 Mar 21;113(11):e463-654. Review.

Harvey SB, Hotopf M, Overland S, Mykletun A. Physical activity and common mental disorders. Br J Psychiatry. 2010 Nov;197(5):357-64. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.075176.

Montgomery PS, Gardner AW. The clinical utility of a six-minute walk test in peripheral arterial occlusive disease patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Jun;46(6):706-11.

Gardner AW, Skinner JS, Smith LK. Effects of handrail support on claudication and hemodynamic responses to single-stage and progressive treadmill protocols in peripheral vascular occlusive disease. Am J Cardiol. 1991 Jul 1;68(1):99-105.

Gardner AW, Katzel LI, Sorkin JD, Goldberg AP. Effects of long-term exercise rehabilitation on claudication distances in patients with peripheral arterial disease: a randomized controlled trial. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2002 May-Jun;22(3):192-8.

Gardner AW, Poehlman ET. Exercise rehabilitation programs for the treatment of claudication pain. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1995 Sep 27;274(12):975-80.

Gardner AW, Skinner JS, Cantwell BW, Smith LK. Progressive vs single-stage treadmill tests for evaluation of claudication. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991 Apr;23(4):402-8.

Gardner AW, Poehlman ET. Assessment of free-living daily physical activity in older claudicants: validation against the doubly labeled water technique. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1998 Jul;53(4):M275-80.

Fife CE, Smart DR, Sheffield PJ, Hopf HW, Hawkins G, Clarke D. Transcutaneous oximetry in clinical practice: consensus statements from an expert panel based on evidence. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2009 Jan-Feb;36(1):43-53.

Crowther RG, Spinks WL, Leicht AS, Quigley F, Golledge J. Relationship between temporal-spatial gait parameters, gait kinematics, walking performance, exercise capacity, and physical activity level in peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jun;45(6):1172-8.

Bruce RA, Kusumi F, Hosmer D. Maximal oxygen intake and nomographic assessment of functional aerobic impairment in cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J. 1973 Apr;85(4):546-62.

Bronas UG, Hirsch AT, Murphy T, Badenhop D, Collins TC, Ehrman JK, Ershow AG, Lewis B, Treat-Jacobson DJ, Walsh ME, Oldenburg N, Regensteiner JG; CLEVER Research Group. Design of the multicenter standardized supervised exercise training intervention for the claudication: exercise vs endoluminal revascularization (CLEVER) study. Vasc Med. 2009 Nov;14(4):313-21. doi: 10.1177/1358863X09102295.

Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002 Feb;52(2):69-77. Review.

Baker JD, Dix DE. Variability of Doppler ankle pressures with arterial occlusive disease: an evaluation of ankle index and brachial-ankle pressure gradient. Surgery. 1981 Jan;89(1):134-7.

ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Jul 1;166(1):111-7.


Responsible Party:	University Hospital, Grenoble
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:	NCT01734603 History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers:	DCIC 12
Study First Received:	November 21, 2012
Last Updated:	June 24, 2015
Health Authority:	France: Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des produits de santé France: The Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés France: Afssaps - Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé (Saint-Denis)

Keywords provided by University Hospital, Grenoble:


Assessment Rehabilitation Walking Constant Test	Walking Graded test Six minute Walking test Walking Distance

Additional relevant MeSH terms:


Peripheral Arterial Disease Peripheral Vascular Diseases Intermittent Claudication Atherosclerosis Arteriosclerosis	Arterial Occlusive Diseases Vascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Signs and Symptoms

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on September 27, 2016

To Top