Probiotics Against Pathogenic Bacteria in Advanced ENT-Surgery
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01730066|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : November 21, 2012
Last Update Posted : December 28, 2018
Surgery in the mouth and oropharynx is performed in an area colonised by bacteria non-pathogenic and pathogenic.
Antibiotics are used regularly resulting in disturbances in the intestinal microbiological flora and consequently diarrhoea that can be troublesome. The use of antibiotics throughout the hospital stay for these difficult cases represent a risk of development of resistant strains.
Most of the patients have cancer diagnoses and have radiation therapy before surgery. This increases the risk of the patients having pathogenic bacteria normally present in the lower GI-tract.
The investigators have shown for ICU patients that treatment with probiotics reduces the number of emerging enteral bacteria in the oropharynx and now the investigators will perform an adjusted procedure for patients planned for large ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgery.
Patients will preoperatively gurgle a suspension of probiotics and then swallow the preparation.
Postoperatively the probiotics is given enterally and a eventually by mouth again.
Cultures will be taken from the oropharynx and tracheal secretions and the results will be compared
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Advanced ENT Surgery Microbiological Flora in the Oropharynx and Lower Airways||Dietary Supplement: L. plantarum 299 and L. plantarum 299v (+maltodextrin)||Not Applicable|
Longer surgical procedures require intubation and there is a potential risk of contaminating the lower airways with pathogenic bacteria from the mouth and oropharynx.
Surgery including the mouth and the oropharynx is performed in an area that is colonised by hundreds of different bacterial species. In the healthy person there is a balance between the different microbes and possible pathogens are kept under control.
Patients that are subject to surgery in the mouth, oropharynx or neck area, most often have cancer diagnoses. Preoperative treatment (mostly radiation) is done in most cases resulting in a changed spectrum of bacteria in the mouth and oropharynx. Due to lowered appetite increased difficulties to eat, in combination with cancer diagnosis, there is also a change in cranial direction of the microbiological gut flora resulting in the presence of pathogens such as Gram-negative bacteria. Those species may result in troublesome infections in the postoperative period.
With healthy people pathogenic bacteria originating from the gastro/intestinal canal are seldom found in the oropharynx, but those do occur among many patients.
Antibiotics are used prophylactic and for more extensive surgery, as micro vascular procedures with free transplants of tissues, antibiotics are kept throughout the length of stay (LOS) in hospital. This results in an increased risk for the development of resistant bacteria and does result in changes in the GI flora in those patients. Diarrhoea occurs frequently and are troublesome for the patients For ICU patients we have seen a reduction of emerging enteric bacteria in patients given oral care with probiotics and this study will explore the possibility of the same kind of positive effects in patients due for extensive surgery performed during several hours.
Many of the patients will have a tracheostomy performed as part of the surgical procedure.
Patients will be randomised (1:1) to either no prophylaxis (standard procedure today) or to preparation with a probiotic suspension fro the day before surgery until discharge from hospital.
Preoperatively the patients will gurgle a suspension of probiotics and then swallow the preparation.
Postoperatively the probiotics is given enterally and a eventually when the responsible surgeon find it suitable by mouth again.
Cultures at inclusion, after intubation, and then on predefined days postoperatively to compare bacterial flora in the oropharynx and in tracheal secretions.
Infectious parameters will be followed.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||102 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||Probiotics for Reduction of Pathogenic Bacteria in Connection With Advanced Surgery in the Mouth, the Oropharynx, and on the Neck|
|Actual Study Start Date :||October 2012|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||February 2019|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||February 2019|
Patients will gurgle and swallow a mixture of probiotic bacteria preoperatively and given the same study product enterally postoperatively
Dietary Supplement: L. plantarum 299 and L. plantarum 299v (+maltodextrin)
Patients will be given a mixture of maltodextrin ( a starch product often used i alimentary products) and two strains of probiotic bacteria ( L. plantarum 299 and L. plantarum 299v ) dissolved in water. They will gurgle and swallow the suspension from the day before surgery. Postoperatively they will be given the probiotic mixture via a nasogastric tubing twice a day and when the responsible surgeon find it suitable also orally as described above. When they can swallow no study product is given through the nasogastric tube.
Patients randomized 1:1 between groups
No Intervention: Control
No intervention.What has been the standard procedure so far
- Differences in pathogenic bacteria in the oropharynx [ Time Frame: During hospitalization, anticipated mean time 12 days ]Emerging and resident bacteria will be compared for the cultures taken in the oropharynx and from tracheal secretions in connection to a surgical intervention and postoperatively
- White Blood Cell count [ Time Frame: During hospital stay, expected mean LOS 12 days ]WBC taken pre-op and then on predefined days postoperatively
- C Reactive Protein [ Time Frame: Throughout the hospital stay, expected mean LOS 12 days ]CRP taken pre-op and then on predefined days postoperatively
- Length of Hospital stay [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2-3 weeks ]Length of stay is recorded for the Hospital stay, and for those cases that have an extended post-operative period in the ICU, the length of the ICU stay will be recorded
- Survival [ Time Frame: Six months ]For participating patients the status of survival or non survival at days 28 and 180 (six months) will be recorded
- Diarrhoea and obstipation [ Time Frame: Throughout the hospital stay, expected mean LOS 12 days ]
As ICU patients tend to display diarrhoea as well as obstipation the frequency and consistency of stools will be recorded.
Probiotics are anticipated to stabilise bowel function
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01730066
|Contact: Bengt Klarin, MD, PhD||+4646171941||Bengt.Klarin@med.lu.se|
|Contact: Anna Tranberg Lindqvist, MD||+4646172233||Anna.TranbergLindqvist@skane.se|
|Lund University Hospital||Recruiting|
|Lund, Sweden, SE 22185|
|Contact: Bengt Klarin, MD, PhD +4646171941 Bengt.Klarin@med.lu.se|
|Contact: Anna Tranberg Lindqvist, MD +4646172233 Anna.TranbergLindqvist@skane.se|
|Principal Investigator: Bengt Klarin, MD, PhD|
|Sub-Investigator: Anna Tranberg Lindqvist, MD|
|Sub-Investigator: Anne Adolfsson, RN|
|Principal Investigator:||Bengt Klarin, MD, PhD||Lund University Hospital|