Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients With Drug-resistant Hypertension and Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation (RSDforAF)
Recruitment status was Recruiting
To study whether renal sympathetic denervation(RSD) is safe and effective in patients with drug-resistant hypertension and symptomatic atrial fibrillation.
Procedure: renal sympathetic denervation
Procedure: Direct-Current Cardioversion
|Study Design:||Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
|Official Title:||Safety and Effectiveness Study of Percutaneous Catheter-based Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients With Drug-resistant Hypertension and Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation|
- Change in atrial fibrillation burden [ Time Frame: from Baseline and 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]to demonstrate the effect of RSD on AF burden in patients with drug-resistant hypertension and symptomatic AF.
- rate controlling in persistent AF patients [ Time Frame: from baseline to 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]to demonstrate the effect of RSD on rate controlling in persistent AF patients from baseline to 12 months post-randomization,
- office systolic blood pressure [ Time Frame: from baseline to 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]the change in office systolic blood pressure from baseline to 12 months post-randomization
- changes in cardiac structure and function,autonomic nerve function,fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, blood lipid, apnea-hypopnea index, pulse wave velocity and quality of life [ Time Frame: from baseline to 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]changes in cardiac structure and function by echocardiogram (include left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, interventricular septum, left atrium diameter), autonomic nerve function (heart rate variability by Holter), fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, blood lipid, apnea-hypopnea index, pulse wave velocity and quality of life.
|Study Start Date:||July 2012|
|Estimated Study Completion Date:||July 2015|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date:||October 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
Experimental: renal sympathetic denervation
Contrast renal angiography was performed to localize and assess the renal arteries. Once the anatomy was deemed acceptable, the internally irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter was introduced into each renal artery. This was then maneuvered within the renal artery to allow energy delivery in a circumferential, longitudinally staggered manner to minimize the chance of renal artery stenosis. About four to eight ablations at 10 W for 60 seconds each were performed in both renal arteries. After renal sympathetic denervation, patients with persistent AF accepted direct-current cardioversion immediately.
Procedure: renal sympathetic denervation
Contrast renal angiography was performed to localize and assess the renal arteries for accessibility and appropriateness for RSD. Once the anatomy was deemed acceptable, the internally irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter(Celsius Thermocool, Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, California) was introduced into each renal artery. then was maneuvered within the renal artery to allow energy delivery in a circumferential, longitudinally staggered manner to minimize the chance of renal artery stenosis. About four to eight ablations at 10 W for 1 minute each were performed in both renal arteries. During ablation, the catheter system monitored tip temperature and impedance, altering radiofrequency energy delivery in response to a predetermined algorithm.
Other Names:Drug: drug
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor antagonist, calcium antagonists, diuretic, beta adrenoceptor blocking agents, propafenone, amiodaroneProcedure: Direct-Current Cardioversion
After renal sympathetic denervation, Persistent AF individual (except intracardiac thrombus) accept Direct-Current Cardioversion within one week. anticoagulation (INR 2.0 to 3.0) is recommended for at least 3 weeks prior to and 4 weeks after cardioversion.
Other Name: Cardioversion
Active Comparator: drug therapy
Patients in the drug treatment group will be followed-up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after randomization. All the patients in this group will take their baseline antihypertensive medication at the original doses, without any changes except when medically required. Antiarrhythmic drugs treatment is consistent in both arms.
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor antagonist, calcium antagonists, diuretic, beta adrenoceptor blocking agents, propafenone, amiodarone
Atrial fibrillation(AF) is the most common arrhythmia, and its frequency increases with age. Hemodynamic impairment and thromboembolic events related to AF result in significant morbidity, mortality, and cost. Management of patients with AF involves 3 objectives—correction of the rhythm disturbance, rate control, and prevention of thromboembolism. Regardless of whether the rate-control or rhythm-control strategy is pursued, attention must also be directed to antithrombotic therapy for prevention of thromboembolism. Pharmacological cardioversion approaches appear simple but are less efficacious. The major risk is related to poor tolerance of side effects，drug—associated toxicity，and proarrhythmic potentia1 of antiarrhythmic drugs. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of AF has developed rapidly in recent years, but the number of AF recurrences during the long-term follow-up was significant. In addition, the complications associated with AF ablation procedures likely to result in prolonged hospitalization, long-term disability or death. Hypertension is the most important risk factor for AF , Hypertension is associated with left ventricular hypertrophy, impaired ventricular filling, left atrial enlargement, and slowing of atrial conduction velocity. These changes in cardiac structure and physiology favor the development and maintenance of AF, and they increase the risk of thromboembolic complications. In patients with AF, aggressive treatment of hypertension may reverse the structural changes in the heart, reduce thromboembolic complications, and retard or prevent the occurrence of AF. Recently, many clinical researches have verified that Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation can safely be used to substantially reduce blood pressure, reduce left ventricular hypertrophy, improve glucose tolerance and sleep apnea severity. Simultaneously, a marked reduction in muscle and whole-body sympathetic-nerve activity(MSNA) is apparent, with a decrease in renal and whole-body norepinephrine spillover. Left ventricle hypertrophy, left atrial enlargement, high norepinephrine level，glucose tolerance abnormity and obstructive sleep apnea are all recognized as independent risk factors for the development and recurrence of AF. So, we design this randomized parallel control multi center clinical study to demonstrate whether renal sympathetic denervation is safe and effective in patients with hypertension and symptomatic atrial fibrillation.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01713270
|Contact: Qijun Shan, professor||0086 025 email@example.com|
|First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University||Recruiting|
|Nanjing,, Jiangsu, China, 210000|
|Contact: Qijun Shan, professor 0086 025 68136407 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Study Chair:||Qijun Shan, professor||The First Hospital of Nanjing Medical University|