Implementation of CPT for PTSD in Diverse Communities

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. Identifier: NCT01702168
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified April 2015 by Luana Marques, Massachusetts General Hospital.
Recruitment status was:  Active, not recruiting
First Posted : October 5, 2012
Last Update Posted : April 8, 2015
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Luana Marques, Massachusetts General Hospital

Brief Summary:

Aim: To identify, assess, and address organizational context and provider-level barriers and facilitators of implementation of Evidence-based treatments (EBTs) using a mixed-methods approach in a diverse community mental health center (CMHC), Massachusetts General Hospital Chelsea Health Clinic (MGH Chelsea).

Hypothesis: Anticipated barriers may include, but are not limited to, organizational climate, heavy case-loads, community mental health workers (CMHW) beliefs about EBTs, and provider motivation to learn EBT.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic Other: Provider training: Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)

Study Type : Observational
Actual Enrollment : 32 participants
Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Prospective
Official Title: Implementation of Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in Diverse Communities
Study Start Date : October 2012
Estimated Primary Completion Date : August 2016
Estimated Study Completion Date : July 2017

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

U.S. FDA Resources

Group/Cohort Intervention/treatment
CBT Training Other: Provider training: Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)

Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. EBPAS-50 [ Time Frame: up to 5 years ]
    Evidence Based Practice Attitudes Scale (EBPAS-50) is a brief, validated measure of clinician attitudes towards evidence based treatments (EBTs) containing four subscales: 1) Appeal measures whether the provider would adopt a new practice if it is intuitively appealing, or is being used by colleagues who are happy with it; 2)Requirement measures whether provider would adopt a practice if it is required by an agency, supervisor, or state; 3)Openness measures whether the provider is generally open to trying new interventions and would be willing to try or use new types of therapy, and 4)Divergence measures whether the provider perceives research-based interventions as not clinically useful or less important than clinical experience.

  2. ORC [ Time Frame: up to 5 years ]
    Organizational Readiness for Change (ORC) measures organizational climate. The ORC is defined as the organizational and staff factors related to adoption of new technologies. ORC is conceptualized as a set of factors that are necessary for sustained change. These factors include motivation, resources, staff attributes, and organizational climate. Readiness for change has been associated with successful dissemination.

  3. OSC [ Time Frame: up to 5 years ]
    The Organizational Social Context (OSC) measures the following domains: structure, culture, psychological and organizational climate, and work attitudes. The OSC measurement system is a validated measure guided by a model of social context that composes both organizational(structure and culture) and individual (work attitudes and behavior) level constructs, including individual and shared perceptions (psychological and organizational climate) that are believed to mediate the impact of the organization on the individual. The OSC measurement system includes 105 items that form 16 first order factors and seven second order factors confirmed in national samples of social and mental health service organizations. These factors are grouped by the domains of structure, culture, psychological and organizational climate, and work attitudes.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Senior)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Sampling Method:   Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
We will be working with community mental health workers and stakeholders at a community clinic, MGH Chelsea.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be over 18 years of age
  • Speak English
  • Be employed at least part time at MGH
  • Willing to have focus group/interview audiotaped and transcribed for data analysis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inability to meet the above inclusion criteria

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its identifier (NCT number): NCT01702168

United States, Massachusetts
Massachusetts General Hospital Chelsea Health Center
Chelsea, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
Sponsors and Collaborators
Massachusetts General Hospital
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Responsible Party: Luana Marques, Assistant in Psychology, Massachusetts General Hospital Identifier: NCT01702168     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 1K23MH096029-01A1 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract )
First Posted: October 5, 2012    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: April 8, 2015
Last Verified: April 2015

Keywords provided by Luana Marques, Massachusetts General Hospital:

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Stress Disorders, Traumatic
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders
Mental Disorders