Assessment of Hemodynamic Response During Intubation Between Rigid Laryngoscopy and Track Light in Coronary Patients
Opioids provide greater patient comfort during intubation, but are not able to abolish completely the release adrenergic hormones during the laryngoscopy, which may cause undesirable hemodynamic changes.
In this study the investigators selected two techniques commonly used for intubation, laryngoscopy and track light, so the investigators can verify which intubation techniques provides less hemodynamic changes in coronary patients under standard anesthesia induction.
Coronary Disease Undergoing CABG
Procedure: track light
|Study Design:||Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
|Official Title:||Randomized Clinical Trials to Compare the Hemodynamic Response During Intubation Between Rigid Laryngoscopy and Track Light in Coronary Patients Undergoing CABG|
- hemodynamic response [ Time Frame: patient prepare (baseline), 1min after induction, 5 min after induction, 1 min after intubation ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]tracheal intubation with track light release less adrenergic hormones than laryngoscopy intubation
|Study Start Date:||February 2010|
|Study Completion Date:||March 2010|
|Primary Completion Date:||March 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
Active Comparator: Laryngoscopy
Laryngoscopy Track Light teaqueal intubation
tracheal intubation with two different techniques, track light and laryngoscopy.
Other Name: rigidy laryngoscopy,
|Active Comparator: Track Light||Procedure: track light|
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01682707
|National Institute of Cardiology / Ministry of Health|
|Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 22240-005|
|Principal Investigator:||Marcello F Salgado filho, MD||Federal University of Juiz de Fora|