This site became the new on June 19th. Learn more.
Show more Menu IMPORTANT: Listing of a study on this site does not reflect endorsement by the National Institutes of Health. Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more... Menu IMPORTANT: Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more... Menu
Give us feedback

Modification of ESIN-osteosynthesis in a Femoral Fracture Model and Its Transmission to Clinical Practice (ESIN)

This study has been completed.
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Martin M Kaiser, University of Luebeck Identifier:
First received: August 12, 2012
Last updated: February 13, 2014
Last verified: February 2014

Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) is the standard treatment for displaced diaphyseal femoral fractures in children. However, some literature report high complication rates (10-50%) in complex fractures. Data of our own patients with special emphasis on complications showed also mediocre results. Thus, a biomechanical study was conducted to search for modifications. In this study the stiffness with a 3rd nail implanted was compared to the classical 2 C-shaped configuration. For each of the 3 configurations of retrograde ESIN (titanium nails) eight composite femoral grafts (Sawbones®) with an identical spiral fracture were used: 2C configuration (2 C-shaped nails, 2x3.5 mm), 3CM configuration (3rd from antero-medial, + 1x2.5 mm) and 3CL configuration (3rd from antero-lateral, + 1x2.5 mm). Each group underwent biomechanical testing in 4-point bending, IRO/ERO and axial compression (0°/9°). Due to a significantly higher stiffness of 3CL in the anterior-posterior, internal rotation and 9° compression directions implantation of 3 nails became standard treatment for all dislocated femoral fractures at our department.

All patients were followed prospectively. The following data was collected: Type of osteosynthesis, any kind of complication (additional procedures like cast or external fixateur, Re-Do operations, misalignment, pseudarthrosis, skin irritation, infection), time until full weight bearing and time until implant removal. At follow-up the legs were controlled for a possible length discrepancy and a possible deviation of axis. Patients` satisfaction was controlled by CSQ (clients satisfaction score, Larsen et al 2002). Further on the Harris Hip Score was used. X-ray controls were done as standard care protocol after 1 and 3-4 months (dependend on age).

Level of Evidence IV Keywords: Elastic stable intramedullary nailing, biomechanical testing, fracture, femur, treatment, children, adolescents.

Condition Intervention
Femoral Fracture Children Procedure: 3-Nail-ESIN in femoral shaft fractures

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: From Bench to Bedside: Modification of Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing With a 3rd Nail in a Femoral Spiral Fracture Model and Its Transmission to Clinical Practice

Resource links provided by NLM:

Further study details as provided by Martin M Kaiser, University of Luebeck:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Intraoperative and postoperative complications [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
    All complications will be recorded: Intraoperative and postoperative complications, Re-Do operations

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • misalignment [ Time Frame: 12 m ]

    Follow up X-rays will be measured for misalignment in degrees (sagittal, frontal and transverse plane) Data will be grouped as

    a) 1 - 5° b) 6 - 10° c) 11 - 15° d)16 - 20° e) 20 - 30° f) > 30°

  • Pseudarthrosis [ Time Frame: 12 m ]

Other Outcome Measures:
  • Limb discrepancy [ Time Frame: 12 m ]

    both legs will be measured from spina iliaca anterior superior to the lateral malleolus in cm.

    Results will be grouped as:

    a) 0 - 0.5 cm b) 0.6 - 1.0 cm c) 1.1 - 1.5 cm d) 1.6 - 2.0 cm e)> 2 cm

Enrollment: 18
Study Start Date: January 2009
Study Completion Date: December 2012
Primary Completion Date: October 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Active Comparator: Femoral fracture, ESIN
Prospectively all patients treated with the 3-nail-configuration for dislocated femoral shaft fractures were enrolled; 25 patients are planned, 18 could be enrolled Comparison will be with own previous data of patients treated with the "classical" 2-C-shaped ESIN-osteosynthesis
Procedure: 3-Nail-ESIN in femoral shaft fractures

Detailed Description:
see above

Ages Eligible for Study:   3 Years to 17 Years   (Child)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Dislocated femoral fracture
  • ESIN osteosynthesis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No given informed consent
  • Other osteosynthesis than ESIN
  Contacts and Locations
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

Please refer to this study by its identifier: NCT01673048

Department of Pediatric Surgery
Luebeck, Germany, 23538
Sponsors and Collaborators
University of Luebeck
Principal Investigator: Martin M Kaiser, PD Dr. med. University Luebeck
  More Information

Additional Information:
Responsible Party: Martin M Kaiser, Consultant, University of Luebeck Identifier: NCT01673048     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 3ESINFemur
Study First Received: August 12, 2012
Last Updated: February 13, 2014

Keywords provided by Martin M Kaiser, University of Luebeck:
Elastic stable intramedullary nailing
biomechanical testing

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Fractures, Bone
Femoral Fractures
Wounds and Injuries
Leg Injuries processed this record on August 16, 2017