A Comparison of Dermal Autograft to AlloDerm in Breast Reconstruction
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01561287|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : March 23, 2012
Last Update Posted : May 11, 2016
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Mastectomy Related Lymphedema Breast Reconstruction Breast Cancer||Procedure: Dermal Autograft Procedure: AlloDerm||Phase 4|
This is a retrospective comparative study of two established therapies. It is designed to enroll patients who will be undergoing breast reconstruction with tissue expanders/implants. Two groups will be created. One with patients receiving acellular dermal allograft for submuscular coverage and a second group of patients undergoing dermal autograft for submuscular coverage. Patients with a lower abdominal scar and sufficient abdominal laxity for autograft harvest will be offered this technique. The subset of these patients who elect to undergo autografting will comprise the autograft group. The allograft group will consist of the patients without a suitable abdomen for autografting and those who decline the autograft procedure. Patients in the allograft group will have placement of dermal allograft over the lower pole of the tissue expander. Patients in the autograft group will undergo harvest of a dermal autograft from the lower abdomen at the time of mastectomy, which will be used to cover the lower pole of the tissue expander. The following data will be recorded in an unidentifiable fashion: age, medical history, type of breast cancer treatment, type of reconstruction to include implant type, brand, implant size and characteristics, time of surgery including autograft harvest, and cost of overall procedure. Patients will receive routine follow-up care only, and the presence of any complications will be recorded. Per the standard reconstructive sequence for implant-based breast reconstruction, all patients will undergo a second surgical procedure under general anesthesia approximately three months following the initial surgical procedure for replacement of the tissue expander with a permanent implant and capsulotomy. At the time of this procedure, three small samples of the internal capsule will be harvested from standard locations with a 4mm biopsy punch. Histology with H/E and factor VIII staining will be performed on these samples to measure inflammation, tissue architecture, and vascular ingrowth. Comorbidities between patients with and without acellular dermal matrices will be evaluated using the Fisher exact test. Group differences for continuous variables will be assessed with the t test.
Statistical significance will be defined as p < 0.05.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||48 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Primary Purpose:||Supportive Care|
|Official Title:||A Comparison of Dermal Autograft to Commercially Available Dermal Allograft in Breast Reconstruction|
|Study Start Date :||July 2011|
|Primary Completion Date :||May 2016|
|Study Completion Date :||May 2016|
|Experimental: Dermal Autograft||
Procedure: Dermal Autograft
Patients in the dermal autograft group will undergo harvest of a dermal autograft from the lower abdomen at the time of mastectomy, which will be used to cover the lower pole of the tissue expander.
The acellular dermal matrix used in our study is AlloDerm (LifeCell Corp., Branchburg, N.J.) The AlloDerm group will consist of patients without a suitable abdomen for autografting and those who declined the dermal autograft procedure. Patients in the dermal allograft group will have placement of AlloDerm over the lower pole of the tissue expander. Patients with a lower abdominal scar and sufficient abdominal laxity for autograft harvest will be offered this technique.
- Vascular Ingrowth [ Time Frame: Three months post-surgery ]To accurately measure the neovascularization of the implants, the number of blood vessels per 40x high-power field (hpf) will be counted on the slides stained with Factor VIII. Any brown-staining endothelial cell or endothelial-cell cluster, clearly separate from adjacent microvessel and other connective-tissue elements, will be considered a single, countable microvessel. Vessel lumens, although usually present, will not be necessary for a structure to be defined as a microvessel, and red cells will not be used to define a vessel lumen.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01561287
|United States, Kentucky|
|University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center|
|Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40536|
|Principal Investigator:||Brian D Rinker, MD||University of Kentucky|