Upper Arm Reahabilitation After Stroke and Video Game (MARGAUT)

Study Description

Go to 

Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Brief Summary:

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficiency of occupational therapy enhanced by "dedicated adaptative video games" in rehabilitation of the upper arm of stroke patients in the acute phase after their cerebro-vascular accident. Our hypothesis is that occupational therapy enhanced by dedicated adaptative video games is more efficient in improving motor recovery of the upper arm than conventional occupational therapy alone.

Condition or disease	Intervention/treatment	Phase
Stroke; Cerebro-vascular Accident; Upper Arm Disability; Reaching; Grasping	Procedure: serious game reeducation; Procedure: functional MRI	Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

Introduction : Stroke constitutes one of the most disabiliting desease in industrialized countries, leading to major deficiencies, especially in the upper arm (concerning 50 to 80% of post-stroke patients). Upper arm rehabilitation after stroke improved during the last ten years, with the development of new rehabilitation methods including constraint induced therapy, mirror therapy, mental imaging, virtual reality and robotics. Video games and virtual reality are very promising in this field, and the development of new adaptative games dedicated to upper arm rehabilitation after stroke is necessary to enhance the benefit of those devices in therms of sensori-motor and functional recovery.

Objectives: To prove the efficiency of video-gaming (using dedicated adaptative games) on recovery of motor function of the upper armafter stroke, compared to a "conventional" rehabilitation program.

Design: Multicentric Randomized Controlled TrialParticipants: 50 early stroke patients and 12 healthy control persons will be included in this trial. Inclusion criteria for patients are as follow: age>18, onset of stroke <6 weeks, first unique supra-tentorial ischemic or haemorrhagic stroke, Fugl Meyer score of the upper arm < 30/66 at inclusion. Exclusion criteria are as follow: severe neglect or aphasia, upper arm severe orthopedic limitation, shoulder pain > 5/10, contra-indication to MRI.

Methods:All patient will get a "standard program" of rehabilitation 5 days/week duiong six weeks, including physiotherapy (one or two sessions/day), occupational therapy (one session/day) and speech therapy if necessary (one session/day). Patients will be randomized in two groups: the "treated group" receiving an additional session of 30 to 45 minutes of daily rehabilitation with video games under the supervision of an occupational therapist, and the "control group" receiving the same anount of "standard rehabilitation" provided by an occupational therapist.Assesment will be conducted at inclusion (J0), at the end of the program (Week 6: W6) and at follow-up (end of month 6: M6)).

Recorded datas: The primary endpoint is the difference in increasing the upper arm Fugl Meyer Score (FMS) between both groups at W6. Secondary criterions include: FMS at M6, Box and Block Test at W6 and M6, Nine Hole Peg test at W6 and M6, Wolf Motor Function Test at W6 and M6, Motor Activity Log at W6 and M6, Barthel Index at W6 and M6, SF-36 at W6 and M6. Functional MRI and tensor diffusion imaging will also be conducted in 25 patients and 12 controls, at J0 and W6. Evolution of cerebral plasticity and correlations between cerebral re-organisations and kinematic characteristics of upper arm movements will be provided.

Study Design

Go to 

Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Study Type :	Interventional (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment :	62 participants
Allocation:	Randomized
Intervention Model:	Parallel Assignment
Masking:	Single (Investigator)
Primary Purpose:	Treatment
Official Title:	Effect of Early Upper Arm Rehabilitation After Stroke Using Adaptative Video Games
Actual Study Start Date :	September 12, 2011
Actual Primary Completion Date :	March 22, 2016
Actual Study Completion Date :	July 12, 2016

Arms and Interventions

Go to 

Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Arm	Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Serious game; In this group, patients will have a session of conventional retraining with a serious game retraining.	Procedure: serious game reeducation; It's a daily session (45 minutes) of reeducation by serious game (kinect) compared to a daily session (45 minutes) of conventional reeducation; Procedure: functional MRI; the functional MRI (siemens) will be done on 25 stroke patients and 12 healthy volunteers at baseline and at 6 weeks.
Active Comparator: control patients; In this group, patients will have the conventional retraining with an other conventional retrainning session. The difference between both groups of patients is the serious game session for one group and conventional session for the other group	Procedure: serious game reeducation; It's a daily session (45 minutes) of reeducation by serious game (kinect) compared to a daily session (45 minutes) of conventional reeducation; Procedure: functional MRI; the functional MRI (siemens) will be done on 25 stroke patients and 12 healthy volunteers at baseline and at 6 weeks.
Placebo Comparator: controls; For the neurologic assessments, patients are compared to healthy patient (without stroke)	Procedure: functional MRI; the functional MRI (siemens) will be done on 25 stroke patients and 12 healthy volunteers at baseline and at 6 weeks.

Outcome Measures

Go to 

Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Primary Outcome Measures :

1. Efficacy assessment of the serious game on the recovery of the upper limb [ Time Frame: at 6 weeks ]
   Difference in increase of the Upper Arm Fugl Meyer Score (max: 66) between both groups, at the end of the rehabilitation program (week 6)

Secondary Outcome Measures :

1. Fugl Meyer Score between both groups [ Time Frame: at 6 Months ]
   Difference in increase of the Upper Arm Fugl Meyer Score (max: 66) between both groups, at the end of the study(6 months)
2. Box and Block Test assessment between both groups [ Time Frame: at 6 Weeks and 6 Months ]
   The box and block test assess the global capacities of prehension of patients. It's important to compare these capacities between both groups of treatment.
3. Wolf Motor Function Test assessment between both groups. [ Time Frame: at 6 weeks and at 6 months ]
   To assess the motor capacity by the Wolf motor funtion at 6 Weeks and after 6 Months.
4. Motor Activity Log assessment between both groups [ Time Frame: at 6 weeks and at 6 months ]
   This test assess the frequency of use and the quality of the movement.
5. Barthel Index and SF-36 [ Time Frame: at 6 weeks and at 6 months ]
   The Barthel Index assess the global functional capacities by a score (calculated /100)between both groups of patients. The SF-36 is a self-questionnaire which permits the evalulation of quality of life.
6. Functional MRI Assessment between controls and patients [ Time Frame: at baseline and at 6 weeks ]
   Functional MRI permits to study of the topographics neuronal circuits involved in the recovery of the motor functions of the upper limb: evaluation of the profiles of activation involved in the execution of the movement of fingers flexion / extension involving the right hemisphere and then the left hemisphere.
7. Nine Hole Peg test assessment between both groups [ Time Frame: at 6 weeks and at 6 months ]
   To assess the efficacy of Serious Game on manual dexterity on the duration of Nine Hole Peg test.
8. tensor diffusion analysis between controls and patients [ Time Frame: at 6 weeks ]
   The tensor diffusion imaging will also be conducted in 25 patients and 12 controls, at baseline and at 6 weeks. Evolution of cerebral plasticity and correlations between cerebral re-organisations and kinematic characteristics of upper arm movements will be provided.

Eligibility Criteria

Go to 

Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Ages Eligible for Study:	18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:	All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:	Yes

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

• age > 18
• onset of stroke < 6 weeks
• first unique supra-tentorial ischemic or haemorhagic stroke
• Fugl Meyer score of the upper arm < 30/66 at baseline

Exclusion Criteria:

• severe neglect or aphasia
• upper arm severe orthopedic limitation
• shoulder pain > 5/10
• pregnancy < 3 months
• Contraindication to MRI

Contacts and Locations

Go to 

Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Locations

France
CHRU de Montpellier
Montpellier, France, 34295

Sponsors and Collaborators

University Hospital, Montpellier

Investigators

Principal Investigator:	Laffont Isabelle, MD, PhD	CHRU de Montpellier

More Information

Go to 

Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Responsible Party:	University Hospital, Montpellier
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:	NCT01554449 History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers:	8642; 2010-A00596-33 ( Other Identifier: ID RCB )
First Posted:	March 15, 2012
Last Update Posted:	May 15, 2018
Last Verified:	May 2018

Keywords provided by University Hospital, Montpellier:

Stroke; Upper arm; Rehabilitation; Motor function	Video games; Virtual reality; Occupational Therapy; Functional MRI

Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Stroke; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Brain Diseases; Central Nervous System Diseases	Nervous System Diseases; Vascular Diseases; Cardiovascular Diseases