Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Diabetic Patients

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. Identifier: NCT01488474
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : December 8, 2011
Last Update Posted : January 30, 2015
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Rigaud Marcel, MD, Medical University of Graz

Brief Summary:

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in industrialized countries is estimated to be about 7.3% and its incidence has been growing in recent years. The prevalence of diabetic neuropathy in the diabetic patient population is up to 50%. When limb surgery is necessary, it is reasonable to assume that diabetic patients will benefit from a peripheral regional anesthesia because of the severe comorbidities associated with DM. On the other hand, the use of regional anesthesia (RA) has generally not been recommended in patients with preexisting neuropathies mainly because of medical liability issues, as worsening neuropathy could be attributed to nerve damage caused by the regional anesthetic. The current state of the art of peripheral regional anesthesia for the identification of correct placement of an injection needle suitably close to the target nerve is to elicit a motor response by current injection through the needle. Constant reduction of the current as the nerve is approached ensures close proximity so that an effective nerve block is obtained when the local anesthetic is delivered through the needle, and absence of a motor response at 0.3 mA is generally accepted as a safety marker to avoid harmful intraneural injection. An important deficit in our understanding is whether diabetic neuropathy influences the stimulation parameters for peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), possibly decreasing safety.

The currently proposed research is guided by the hypothesis that nerves in patients with DM are more resistant to stimulation and the current thresholds for PNS have to be set much higher to prevent injections from occurring within the epineurium. The investigators will examine the effect of DM on nerve excitability in a blinded, prospective, observational case control trial. Accordingly, the investigators have defined following aims:

Specific Aim 1: To characterize the required stimulation current in patients with and without diabetes mellitus.

Specific Aim 2: Follow-up to examine if the rate of adverse neurologic events is higher in diabetic patients.

Specific Aim 3: Guided by the results, formulate recommendations for the performance of regional anesthesia in patients with a history of DM.

These experiments will provide better understanding of the needle-current-nerve relationship during peripheral nerve stimulation. Findings from this study will have a major impact on patient safety, especially in the subgroup with preexisting neuropathy, undergoing regional anesthesia.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment
Diabetic Polyneuropathy Procedure: peripheral nerve stimulation

Study Type : Observational
Actual Enrollment : 124 participants
Observational Model: Case Control
Time Perspective: Prospective
Official Title: Influence of Diabetic Neuropathy on Current Settings During Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Regional Anesthesia
Study Start Date : January 2012
Actual Primary Completion Date : December 2013
Actual Study Completion Date : December 2013

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

U.S. FDA Resources

Group/Cohort Intervention/treatment
Diabetes Mellitus (DM)
Patients with diagnosed diabetes mellitus type 1 or 2 undergoing surgery of the lower limb and are receiving regional anesthesia with peripheral nerve stimulation
Procedure: peripheral nerve stimulation
defining the minimal current threshold for distal motor response
Control (C)
Patients with no history of diabetes mellitus Type 1 or 2 undergoing surgery of the lower limb and are receiving regional anesthesia with peripheral nerve stimulation
Procedure: peripheral nerve stimulation
defining the minimal current threshold for distal motor response

Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Minimal current threshold for distal motor response at needle tip nerve contact [ Time Frame: 18 months ]

Biospecimen Retention:   Samples With DNA
  • blood samples
  • any material from surgical resections

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Senior)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Sampling Method:   Probability Sample
Study Population
Surgical patients scheduled for lower limb surgery and are eligible for a popliteal sciatic nerve block

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients of both sexes
  • age more than 18 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiology status 1 to 4
  • signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Allergies to local anesthetics
  • Unwillingness or incapability to sign informed consent
  • Any preexisting neurological deficit of the lower limb that cannot be attributed to diabetic neuropathy
  • Ongoing dual anti-platelet therapy

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its identifier (NCT number): NCT01488474

Medical University of Graz
Graz, Austria, 8036
Sponsors and Collaborators
Medical University of Graz
Principal Investigator: Marcel Rigaud, PD, MD Medical University of Graz

Publications automatically indexed to this study by Identifier (NCT Number):
Responsible Party: Rigaud Marcel, MD, Principal Investigator, Medical University of Graz Identifier: NCT01488474     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: KLI 135
First Posted: December 8, 2011    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: January 30, 2015
Last Verified: January 2015

Keywords provided by Rigaud Marcel, MD, Medical University of Graz:
regional anesthesia
peripheral nerve stimulation
diabetic neuropathy

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Diabetic Neuropathies
Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
Neuromuscular Diseases
Nervous System Diseases
Diabetes Complications
Diabetes Mellitus
Endocrine System Diseases
Central Nervous System Depressants
Physiological Effects of Drugs