Subjective and Objective Methods of Assessing Walking Limitation Due to Claudication
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01484509|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : December 2, 2011
Last Update Posted : May 15, 2012
Leg artery disease is a common condition in which fatty deposits develop in the blood vessels that supply the legs. Many patients with leg artery disease experience a cramp-like leg pain during walking that is relieved by rest; this is called intermittent claudication. To help determine the severity of leg artery disease, patients may be questioned about how far they can walk before claudication pain forces them to stop. However, this information is usually of limited use because most patients poorly estimate their walking capacity. The investigators have developed a simple questionnaire to help estimate walking capacity in patients with leg artery disease. The purpose of this study is to test the validity and reliability of this questionnaire. By validity, the investigators mean the extent to which the questionnaire measures what it is supposed to measure (walking capacity). By reliability, the investigators mean the extent to which the questionnaire produces the same results over time when completed on two different days.
The investigators hypothesise that the investigators simple questionnaire will be valid and reliable.
|Condition or disease|
Claudication is a chronic condition that impairs walking capacity. Lower-extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a frequent cause of claudication. Claudication is suspected to be vascular-type (i.e. of arterial origin) when pain or discomfort occurs in the leg muscles during exercise and is relieved within 10 min of rest. The "maximal walking distance" (MWD; the distance at which pain forces the patient to stop walking) is of great importance for assessing the severity of claudication. Patient interview is the most readily accessible way of estimating walking capacity in routine clinical practice; however, patients with PAD typically poorly estimate their walking capacity. Open questions about the distance a patient can walk before limb pain or discomfort forces them to stop lack standardisation. Questions such as "Because of a health or physical problem, do you have any difficulty walking for one mile?" only allow for a yes/no response. The functional status component of the 86-item PAVK-86 questionnaire appears useful for estimating MWD, but this is a time-consuming tool. The Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), which was proposed over a decade ago to standardise the estimation of walking capacity by patient interview, is widely used. However, the WIQ is also relatively complex (14 items with 5 possible answers for each item: 70 boxes), which often results in a large number of errors when self-completed by the patient. Furthermore, the WIQ score is difficult to obtain by mental calculation.
The investigators have developed a simple, 4-item questionnaire, called the Estimation of Ambulation Capacity by History Questionnaire (EACH-Q), for estimating walking capacity in patients with symptomatic PAD (vascular-type claudication). The EACH-Q estimates the maximal duration that can be achieved (8 possibilities ranging impossible to 3 hours or more) at 4 different displacement speeds (from slow walking to running). Scores can be obtained easily by multiplying the rank of each possible answer (impossible being zero) by a speed factor. We recently validated the EACH-Q against constant-load treadmill-walking-test performance in patients suffering from vascular-type claudication. However, further research is needed to assess the validity of the EACH-Q against other objective tests of walking capacity (e.g. incremental treadmill-walking test, 6-min walk test), and to assess its reproducibility.
Hence, the aims of this study are: (i) to assess the validity of the EACH-Q against objective measures of walking capacity obtained from the Gardner-Skinner incremental treadmill-walking test and the 6-min walk test, and; (ii) to assess the inter-day reproducibility of the EACH-Q. The results will be compared against those obtained from the WIQ, and the participant cohort will be patients suffering from vascular-type claudication.
|Study Type :||Observational|
|Actual Enrollment :||37 participants|
|Official Title:||The Estimation of Ambulation Capacity by History Questionnaire (EACH-Q): An Assessment of Its Validity and Inter-day Reproducibility in Patients With Vascular-type Claudication|
|Study Start Date :||June 2011|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||May 2012|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||May 2012|
- Treadmill maximum walking distance [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ]
- EACH-Q walking questionnaire score [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ]
- WIQ walking questionnaire score [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ]
- Self-reported maximum walking distance [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ]
- 6-minute maximum walking distance [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ]
- GPS-measured maximum walking distance [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ]
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01484509
|Sheffield Hallam University|
|Sheffield, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom, S10 2BP|
|Sheffield Vascular Institute|
|Sheffield, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom, S5 7AU|
|Principal Investigator:||Garry A Tew, PhD||Sheffield Hallam University|
|Principal Investigator:||Pierre Abraham, MD, PhD||University Hospital of Angers, France|
|Principal Investigator:||Shah Nawaz, MD||Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust|