This site became the new ClinicalTrials.gov on June 19th. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu IMPORTANT: Listing of a study on this site does not reflect endorsement by the National Institutes of Health. Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more...
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu IMPORTANT: Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more...
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu
Give us feedback

Efficacy of Zylet vs. Lotemax for the Treatment of Ocular Surface Inflammation/MGD/Blepharitis (ZvL)

This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Reza Dana, MD, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01456780
First received: August 2, 2011
Last updated: May 19, 2017
Last verified: May 2017
  Purpose
This is a Phase IV, single site, randomized, double masked, parallel control clinical trial of 60 subjects to investigate the variance of efficacy between Lotemax® and Zylet® for treatment of ocular surface inflammation due to meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). Efficacy will be measured by in-vivo confocal microscopy, corneal fluorescein staining, grading of meibomian gland dysfunction and validated ocular symptom assessment questionnaire.

Condition Intervention Phase
Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Posterior Blepharitis Drug: Loteprednol/tobramycin Drug: Loteprednol Drug: B+L Advanced Eye Relief Lubricant Drop Phase 4

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Relative Efficacy of Loteprednol (Lotemax®) vs. Loteprednol/Tobramycin (Zylet®) in Treatment of Chronic Ocular Surface Inflammation Associated With Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD)/Posterior Blepharitis

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by Reza Dana, MD, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Ocular Surface Disease Index [ Time Frame: Week 4 Time Point ]
    OSDI is a 12-question survey used to measure the symptoms of dry eye disease. Each of the 12 individual questions rate one symptom on a 0-4 scale, with 4 meaning that the symptom is present all of the time and 0 meaning the symptom is present none of the time. The overall ODSI score is calculated by adding all of the values from the 12 questions, multiplying that value by 25, and dividing the resulting value by the number of questions answered. This results in an overall scale that ranges from 0-100, with 100 being severe dry eye symptoms and 0 being no dry eye symptoms.

  • Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) Frequency Score [ Time Frame: Week 4 Time Point ]
    Questionnaire given to patients to assess the frequency of dry eye symptoms. The questionnaire utilizes a 100 mm horizontal Visual Analogue Scale technique to quantify the frequency of the patient's dry eye symptoms. Change is quantified from baseline to week 4. The range of the SANDE frequency scale is 0-100, with 0 being the minimum level of frequency of dry eye symptoms and 100 being the maximum level of frequency of dry eye symptoms.

  • Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) Severity Score [ Time Frame: Week 4 Time Point ]
    Questionnaire given to patients to assess the severity of dry eye symptoms. The questionnaire utilizes a 100 mm horizontal Visual Analogue Scale technique to quantify the severity of the patient's dry eye symptoms. Change is quantified from baseline to week 4. The range of the SANDE severity scale is 0-100, with minimum level of severity of dry eye symptoms and 100 being the maximum level of severity of dry eye symptoms.

  • Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score [ Time Frame: Week 4 Time Point ]
    Corneal Fluorescein Staining is used to assess the level of corneal epitheliopathy that is related to dry eye disease. The CFS scale ranges from 0 to 15 scale, with 0 representing the minimum level of corneal epitheliopathy and 15 representing the maximum level of corneal epitheliopathy.


Enrollment: 60
Study Start Date: August 2011
Estimated Study Completion Date: June 2017
Primary Completion Date: March 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Active Comparator: Zylet
Subject randomized to this arm will be treated with Zylet (Loteprednol/tobramycin), twice a day, for 4 weeks. Zylet is a combination of loteprednol and tobramycin. Loteprednol is in a class of drugs called corticosteroids. Loteprednol inhibits processes in the body that cause inflammation. Tobramycin is an antibiotic.
Drug: Loteprednol/tobramycin
Zylet (loteprednol/tobramycin) drops, 1 drop twice a day for 4 weeks.
Other Name: Zylet
Active Comparator: Lotemax
Subject randomized to this arm will be treated with Lotemax, twice a day, for 4 weeks. Lotemax is also known as loteprednol. Loteprednol is in a class of drugs called corticosteroids. Loteprednol inhibits processes in the body that cause inflammation.
Drug: Loteprednol
Eye drops, 1 drop twice a day for 4 weeks
Other Name: Lotemax
Placebo Comparator: B+L Advanced Eye Relief Lubricant Drop
Subject randomized to this arm will be treated with B+L Advanced Eye Relief Lubricant Eye Drops (Artificial Tears), twice a day, for 4 weeks.
Drug: B+L Advanced Eye Relief Lubricant Drop
Bausch + Lomb (B+L) Advanced Eye Relief Lubricant Drop (Artificial Tears), 1 drop twice a day for 4 weeks.
Other Name: artificial tears

Detailed Description:

Posterior blepharitis is a common chronic eyelid condition that is described as generalized inflammation of the posterior lid margin and associated with inflammation of the ocular surface and with symptoms of burning, irritation, and discomfort. Posterior blepharitis is associated with various disorders of the meibomian glands, known collectively as meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). It is associated either with obstruction and inflammation of the meibomian glands or, less commonly, atrophy of the meibomian glands.

Clinically, MGD often presents with inspissated meibomian glands, oily tear film, as well as inflammation and vascularization of the meibomian gland orifices. Papillary hypertrophy of the tarsal conjunctiva and corneal punctate epitheliopathy are often present, and there are prominent associations with dermatoses, such as acne rosacea, seborrhoeic dermatitis, and atopic dermatitis. Evidence from several sources suggests that MGD of sufficient extent and degree is associated with a deficient tear lipid layer, an increase in tear evaporation, and the occurrence of an evaporative dry eye. In fact MGD is considered to be the most common cause of evaporative dry eye. Individuals with MGD often complain of significant discomfort, including burning, itching, irritation, and photophobia. They may also have other associated symptoms of dry eye and may be plagued by blurred vision, gradual contact lens intolerance. Furthermore, these patients may become functionally handicapped by the negative impact of dry eye on their crucial daily activities such as working, reading, using computer, and driving.

Despite the high incidence of posterior blepharitis, there is currently no consistently effective treatment for this condition and it still remains a therapeutic challenge. Posterior blepharitis has traditionally been managed with eyelid hygiene, topical antibiotics (erythromycin or bacitracin ointments), oral tetracyclines (tetracycline, doxycycline, or minocycline) and corticosteroids which are often time consuming, frustrating, and frequently ineffective or variably effective.

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of topical loteprednol (corticosteroid) vs. the combination of loteprednol and tobramycin (corticosteroid and antibiotic) against an artificial tear. It is critical to determine to what extent the addition of an antibiotic to a topical steroid can enhance the therapeutic efficacy of the treatment.

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Senior)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female
  • At least 18 years of age
  • Has not worn contact lenses, except for bandage contact lens or rigid gas permeable lens, for at least 2 weeks prior to the study and agrees to not wear contact lenses during study
  • Patient is in generally good & stable overall health
  • Minimum corneal fluorescein staining of 4 in at least one eye
  • OSDI score >22
  • The patient must have a diagnosis of posterior blepharitis
  • A negative urine pregnancy test result for women of childbearing potential
  • Women of childbearing potential must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control) prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation.
  • Normal lid position and closure
  • Ability to understand and provide informed consent to participate in this study
  • Willingness to follow study instructions and likely to complete all required visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of Stevens-Johnson syndrome or ocular pemphigoid
  • History of eyelid surgery
  • Intra-ocular surgery or ocular laser surgery within 3 months
  • History of microbial keratitis, including herpes
  • Active ocular allergies
  • Corneal epithelial defect > 1mm2
  • Any change in use of topical anti-inflammatories, such as steroids, Restasis, or NSAID within the past 2 weeks
  • Any change in dosage of tetracycline compounds (tetracycline, doxycycline, and minocycline) within the past two weeks
  • Use of isotretinoin (Accutane) within the past 6 months
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Signs of current infection, including fever and current treatment with antibiotics
  • Active liver, renal, or hematologic disease
  • The use of any other investigational drug
  • Individuals with a known history of glaucoma, individuals with IOP >22 Hg in either eye and individuals with a known family history of glaucoma in primary (first degree) relatives (ie. mother, father, sibling or child)
  Contacts and Locations
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01456780

Locations
United States, Massachusetts
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
Sponsors and Collaborators
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Reza Dana, MD, MPH, MSc Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
  More Information

Responsible Party: Reza Dana, MD, Principal Investigator, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01456780     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 11-048H
Study First Received: August 2, 2011
Results First Received: April 6, 2017
Last Updated: May 19, 2017
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: Yes

Keywords provided by Reza Dana, MD, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary:
Meibomian gland dysfunction
Blepharitis
Dry Eye
Ocular Inflammation
MGD
Zylet
Lotemax
Artificial Tear

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Inflammation
Blepharitis
Pathologic Processes
Eyelid Diseases
Eye Diseases
Tobramycin
Lubricant Eye Drops
Loteprednol Etabonate
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Anti-Infective Agents
Ophthalmic Solutions
Pharmaceutical Solutions
Anti-Allergic Agents

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on July 28, 2017