Clinical Progression and Costs in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients Treated With Early Versus Delayed Combination Therapy
In patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), combination therapy with an alpha-blocker (AB) and a 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor (5ARI) has been shown to reduce the progression of acute urinary retention (AUR) and the incidence of prostate surgery, and also provides symptom relief.
The objective of this study is to compare the likelihood of clinical progression (defined as AUR and/or prostate-related surgery) and costs in BPH patients who were treated with delayed combination therapy to BPH patients who were treated with early combination therapy using data from a United States (US) healthcare claims database. The hypothesis of this study is that patients who are prescribed combination therapy early in their BPH treatment will experience better clinical outcomes and lower healthcare costs compared with patients treated with delayed combination therapy. The null hypothesis is that no difference will be observed in outcomes or direct medical costs for patients treated with early combination therapy and patients treated with delayed combination therapy.
The US healthcare claims database includes data from patients with Medicare Advantage as well as private health plan coverage including the Impact health plan. About 14 million people were covered by this set of health plans in 2007 and were geographically diverse across the US. Data from 2000 through 2009 were utilized.
The study is a retrospective cohort analysis.
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Drug: Early combination therapy
Drug: Delayed combination therapy
|Study Design:||Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Retrospective
|Official Title:||Clinical Progression and Costs in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients Treated With Early Versus Delayed Combination Therapy|
- Number of participants with a code that indicates clinical progression [ Time Frame: Data collected over a 9-year time period from 2000 to 2009. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The number of participants who experience clinical progresion (BPH-surgery or AUR) based on treatment or diagnosis codes and compared between participant records of BPH patients treated with early combination therapy compared with delayed combination therapy
- Mean BPH-related medical costs [ Time Frame: Data collected over a 9-year time period from 2000 to 2009 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The mean cost of medical treatment related to BPH in US dollars for records of patients who were treated with early combination therapy and those treated with delayed combination therapy
|Study Start Date:||August 2010|
|Study Completion Date:||March 2011|
|Primary Completion Date:||March 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
Insured male patients age 50 or older with BPH but no evidence of acute urinary retention (AUR) or prostate surgery at the index date
Drug: Early combination therapy
If index drug was an alpha-blocker (AB) (alfuzosin, doxazosin, tamsulosin, or terazosin), a pharmacy claims for a 5-alpha reductase inhibitor (5ARI) (dutasteride, finasteride) on or within 30 days after the index date or if index drug was 5ARI, fill for an AB on or within 30 days after the index date
Other Names:Drug: Delayed combination therapy
If index drug was an AB (alfuzosin, doxazosin, tamsulosin, or terazosin), a pharmacy claim for a 5ARI (dutasteride, finasteride) more than 30 days but less than or equal to 180 days of the index date
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01435954
|Study Director:||GSK Clinical Trials||GlaxoSmithKline|