Hemi Artificial Hipjoint Versus Total Artificial Hipjoint (THA)
|Study Design:||Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
|Official Title:||Clinical and RSA Comparison of Hemi Versus Total Hip Arthroplasty After Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture. A Randomized Double-Blind Study|
- Radiographic and clinical [ Time Frame: Five years ]
Migration / rotation: Migration is measured by X-ray Stereo Photogrammetric Analysis (RSA).
Clinical assessment: The patient is assessed clinically using the WOMAC and EQ-5D.
- Clinical [ Time Frame: Five years ]
Mobilisation: Patient mobilization level before the fracture is assessed by the New Mobility Score.Under hospital assessed patients' ability to time with current time instrument daily using the Cumulated ambulation score (CAS).
Bleeding: Perioperative bleeding set in operation description from start to suture the incision closed. Hgb is measured as standard on the third day in all patients in the hip fracture unit. In addition, registered the need for blood transfusions in the first four postoperative days.
|Study Start Date:||June 2010|
|Study Completion Date:||June 2015|
|Primary Completion Date:||June 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
RSA study on hemi
Procedure: Hemi (hemialloplastik)
THA vs hemi
Other Name: BFX: Biomet CE-number: 00520
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01432691
|Hvidovre University Hospital, Copenhagen|
|Copenhagen, Hvidovre, Denmark, 2650|