A Study of Treatment Preference During Cheek Contouring Comparing Restylane® SubQ With and Without the Addition of Lidocaine Hydrochloride
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01431755|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : September 12, 2011
Results First Posted : April 23, 2014
Last Update Posted : May 9, 2014
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment|
|Facial Tissue Augmentation||Device: Restylane SubQ Device: Restylane SubQ Lidocaine|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||54 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Official Title:||A Randomised, Subject-blinded Study of Treatment Preference During Cheek Contouring Comparing Restylane® SubQ With and Without the Addition of Lidocaine Hydrochloride 0.3%|
|Study Start Date :||September 2011|
|Primary Completion Date :||October 2011|
|Study Completion Date :||October 2012|
Device: Restylane SubQ
Treatment with up to 2 ml of the product
|Restylane SubQ Lidocaine||
Device: Restylane SubQ Lidocaine
Treatment with up to 2 ml of the product
- Percentage of Subjects Who Assessed Treatment With Restylane SubQ Lidocaine as Least Painful. [ Time Frame: When injection of both cheeks were completed ]When injection of both cheeks was completed, the subject was asked which treatment was least painful (right cheek/left cheek/both cheeks alike).
- Subject Pain Assessment by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 15 and 120 Minutes After Treatment. [ Time Frame: 15 and 120 minutes ]Pain was assessed during the first 2 hours after the initial injection of the study products using a 100 mm VAS. The endpoints of the scale were "no pain" (0 mm) and "worst possible pain" (100 mm). Pain was assessed at the time points 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after injection.
- Percentage of Improved Subjects at 2 Weeks After Treatment as Assessed by Use of Global Esthetic Improvement Scale (GEIS) [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ]Esthetic improvement was evaluated by using Global Esthetic Improvement Scale. GEIS was evaluated by comparing current photos with pre-treatment photos and using a 5-graded scale (worse/no change/somewhat improved/much improved/very much improved). A clinically significant global esthetic improvement was defined as a score of somewhat improved, much improved or very much improved. GEIS was assessed by the Investigator and the subject. Each cheek/study product was evaluated separately. GEIS was assessed at the time points 2 weeks, 3 months, 2 weeks after re-treatment and 6, 9 and 12 months after first treatment.
- Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Step Improvement on Medicis Midface Volume Scale (MMVS) at 2 Weeks [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ]The severity of midface volume loss or midface contour deficiency was assessed by the investigators using a 4-graded scale, Medicis Midface Volume Scale -MMVS (1, fairly full; 2, mild loss of fullness; 3, moderate loss, slight hollowing; and 4, substantial loss, clearly apparent hollowing). Each score were exemplified by photographic images on the scale. A one grade decrease in score from screening was defined as a treatment success/improvement.The efficacy in terms of Medicis Midface Volume Scale (MMVS) was assessed by the Investigator per treatment group. The two cheeks were evaluated separately. MMVS was assessed at the time points 2 weeks, 3 months, 2 weeks after re-treatment and 6, 9 and 12 months after first treatment.
- Number of Subjects Reporting at Least 1 Diary Complaint Related to the Cheek Treated With Restylane SubQ and Restylane SubQ Lidocaine Respectively After Initial Treatment. [ Time Frame: 14 days ]A subject diary was completed for 14 days following the initial treatment and the optional re-treatment at the 3-month visit. Each subject was asked to record the presence of bruising, redness, swelling, pain, tenderness and itching.
- Number of Subjects Reporting Adverse Event [ Time Frame: Up to 12 months ]
Adverse Events (AEs) were collected by open questioning, information obtained from signs and symptoms detected during examination, observed by the study personnel or spontaneous reports from the subjects.
All subjects were injected with Restylane SubQ in one cheek and Restylane SubQ Lidocaine in the contralateral cheek.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01431755
|Stockholm, Sweden, 113 24|
|Stockholm, Sweden, 114 36|
|Stockholm, Sweden, 115 42|
|Principal Investigator:||Per Hedén, M.D.||Akademikliniken, Storängsvägen 10, 115 42 Stockholm|