Study on Anti-inflammatory Effect of Anti-hypertensive Treatment in Patients With Small AAA's and Mild Hypertension (PISA)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01425242|
Recruitment Status : Terminated (Insufficient number of participants)
First Posted : August 29, 2011
Last Update Posted : December 9, 2014
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Hypertension Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm||Drug: Aliskiren Drug: Amlodipine||Not Applicable|
Standard therapy of small AAAs currently consists of "watchful waiting" strategy with aggressive blood pressure control "Watchful waiting" includes an Ultrasound (more recently CT or MRI scan) every 12 months (for AAAs between 3.5 - 4.4 cm) or every 6 months (for AAAs between 4.5 and 5.5 cm) to observe. A growth rate of >7 mm/ 6 months has been suggested as a threshold for proceeding to aneurysm repair irrespective of aneurysm size. Clearly, there is need for a more sensitive method to evaluate the progress of AAA growth.
Recent publications have shown that evaluation of AAAs using FDG-uptake with PET-scan may identify small AAAs that are more prone to grow and/or rupture, as these AAAs as compared to normal aorta's show increased inflammatory activity , which is considered the major pathophysiological pathway. Evaluation of FDG-uptake is also sensitive enough to observe the short-term effects of endovascular intervention of large AAAs, as unpublished data show a statistically significant reduction in aneurismal FDG-uptake only 6 weeks after endovascular repair of large AAAs. Therefore, the change in aneurismal FDG-uptake may also be a very promising and sensitive method to evaluate treatment effects of medical interventions within a relatively short period of time (3 months).
Just as pressure unloading may represent an anti-inflammatory mechanism in endovascular repair of more advanced aneurysms, so may milder pressure unloading in moderately hypertensive individuals with smaller aneurysms display similar anti-inflammatory effects. Such a mild form of pressure unloading may be attainable with adequate anti-hypertensive drug therapy. In this context, however, a possible additional benefit may be that some anti-hypertensive drug classes have been proposed to exert specific anti-inflammatory effects relevant to aneurysm inflammation.
Local activation of multiple components of the renin angiotensin system has been implicated in both the development of aneurysms, as well as in their inflammatory component. In accordance, preliminary evidence from murine studies suggest that ACE inhibitors, for example, may reduce inflammatory activity in aneurysmatic vessel walls. However, since ACE inhibitors block the renin angiotensin system halfway it's path, and non-ACE conversion of angiotensin I occurs, a rationale exists to block the renin angiotensin system upstream of ACE. Upstream blockade of the renin-angiotensin system may have additional advantages in antagonising direct pro-inflammatory effects of renin itself, which have been identified in, for example, kidney tissue and retinal microvessels.
A case can thus be made for renin inhibition as a potential optimal strategy for reducing aneurysm inflammation in hypertensive patients with aortic aneurysms. In the proposed pilot trial, the direct renin inhibitor Aliskiren will be evaluated. As a control condition, an antihypertensive agent without postulated specific anti-inflammatory effects is appropriate. Calcium channel blockers represent such a class.
The current study will explore what the size and variability of the effect of aliskiren monotherapy, the combination of aliskiren/hydrochlorothiazide, amlodipine monotherapy, or the combination of amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide on FDG-uptake is (if at all measurable on top of the effect of antihypertensive and statin therapy). This will allow more accurate power calculation of larger future studies aiming at prevention of AAA-progression (diameter and rupture).
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||3 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||An Open-label PET-observer-blinded Pilot Study of the Effect of Aliskiren- Versus Amlodipine-based Antihypertensive Treatment in Patients With Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Mild to Moderate Hypertension on Aneurysmal FDG-uptake|
|Study Start Date :||September 2011|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||December 2013|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||December 2013|
Half of all subjects with mild to moderate hypertension and a small abdominal aortic aneurysm are treated with aliskiren, combined with hydrochlorothiazide if hypertension cannot be treated sufficiently with aliskiren monotherapy
Starting dose: Aliskiren 150 mg p.o, if hypertension is insufficiently treated Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg p.o. tablet once daily for maximally 12 months can be added, the next step is to add increase the dosage of Aliskiren to 300 mg p.o. tablet once daily until maximally 12 months after baseline, the final step to take in case hypertension is still present is to increase Hydrochlorothiazide to 25 mg p.o. tablet once daily until maximally 12 months after baseline.
Other Name: Rasilez
Active Comparator: Amlodipine
Half of all subjects with mild to moderate hypertension and a small abdominal aortic aneurysm are treated with amlodipine, combined with hydrochlorothiazide if hypertension cannot be treated sufficiently with amlodipine monotherapy
Starting dose: amlodipine 5 mg p.o, if hypertension is insufficiently treated Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg p.o. tablet once daily for maximally 12 months can be added, the next step is to add increase the dosage of amlodipine to 10 mg p.o. tablet once daily until maximally 12 months after baseline, the final step to take in case hypertension is still present is to increase Hydrochlorothiazide to 25 mg p.o. tablet once daily until maximally 12 months after baseline.
Other Name: Norvasc
- Change in aneurysmal vessel wall inflammation [ Time Frame: 3 months and 12 months ]Change from baseline in aneurismal FDG-uptake as measured with PET-CT after 3 and 12 months
- Change in abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter [ Time Frame: 12 months ]Change from baseline in aneurismal diameter after 12 months
- Change in large vessel inflammation [ Time Frame: 3 months and 12 months ]Change from baseline in FDG-uptake in other large blood vessels after 3 and 12 months
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01425242
|VU University Medical Center|
|Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1007 MB|
|Principal Investigator:||Jan D Blankensteijn, MD, PhD||VU University Medical Center|