Efficacy and Safety Study of iSONEP With & Without Lucentis/Avastin/Eylea to Treat Wet AMD (Nexus)
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01414153 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : August 11, 2011
Results First Posted : October 17, 2016
Last Update Posted : October 17, 2016
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Exudative Age-related Macular Degeneration | Drug: 4.0 mg iSONEP Drug: 0.5 mg iSONEP Drug: 0.5 mg Lucentis or 1.25 mg Avastin or 2 mg Eylea Drug: sham injection | Phase 2 |
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Actual Enrollment : | 158 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator) |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | Phase 2a, Multicenter, Masked, Randomized, Comparator Controlled Study Evaluating iSONEP™ as Monotherapy or Adjunctive Therapy to Lucentis/Avastin/Eylea Versus Lucentis/Avastin/Eylea Alone for Treatment of Subjects With Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) |
Study Start Date : | August 2012 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | May 2015 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | June 2015 |

Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Monotherapy
4.0 mg iSONEP followed by sham injection; given monthly intravitreously for 4 months
|
Drug: 4.0 mg iSONEP
4.0 mg iSONEP given monthly intravitreously for 4 months
Other Name: sonepcizumab Drug: sham injection administered monthly for 4 months
Other Name: placebo |
Experimental: 0.5 mg iSONEP & Lucentis/Avastin/Eylea
0.5 mg iSONEP and 0.5 mg Lucentis or 1.25 mg Avastin or 2 mg Eylea; given monthly intravitreously for 4 months
|
Drug: 0.5 mg iSONEP
0.5 mg iSONEP given monthly intravitreously for 4 months
Other Name: sonepcizumab Drug: 0.5 mg Lucentis or 1.25 mg Avastin or 2 mg Eylea 0.5 mg Lucentis or 1.25 mg Avastin or 2 mg Eylea given monthly intravitreously for 4 months
Other Names:
|
Experimental: 4.0 mg iSONEP & Lucentis/Avastin/Eylea
4.0 mg iSONEP followed by 0.5 mg Lucentis or 1.25 mg Avastin or 2 mg Eylea; given monthly intravitreously for 4 months
|
Drug: 4.0 mg iSONEP
4.0 mg iSONEP given monthly intravitreously for 4 months
Other Name: sonepcizumab Drug: 0.5 mg Lucentis or 1.25 mg Avastin or 2 mg Eylea 0.5 mg Lucentis or 1.25 mg Avastin or 2 mg Eylea given monthly intravitreously for 4 months
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Lucentis or Avastin or Eylea
0.5 mg Lucentis or 1.25 mg Avastin or 2 mg Eylea followed by a sham injection; given monthly intravitreously for 4 months
|
Drug: 0.5 mg Lucentis or 1.25 mg Avastin or 2 mg Eylea
0.5 mg Lucentis or 1.25 mg Avastin or 2 mg Eylea given monthly intravitreously for 4 months
Other Names:
Drug: sham injection administered monthly for 4 months
Other Name: placebo |
- Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) [ Time Frame: Baseline to Day 120 ]Visual function was assessed using the ETDRS protocol, for which numerical scores range from 0 to 100 (roughly equivalent to 20/10 vision as measured by Snellen). A higher score represents better functioning. A positive number represents an increase in number of letters read correctly.
- Mean Change in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness [ Time Frame: Baseline to Day 120 ]
- Mean Change in CNV Lesion Area as Determined by Fluorescein Angiography (FA). [ Time Frame: Baseline to Day 120 ]
- Proportion of Subjects Gaining Greater Than or Equal to 0, 5, 10 and 15 Letters on the ETDRS Chart. [ Time Frame: Baseline to Day 120 ]Visual function was assessed using the ETDRS protocol, for which numerical scores range from 0 to 100 (roughly equivalent to 20/10 vision as measured by Snellen). A higher score represents better functioning. A positive number represents an increase in number of letters read correctly.
- Proportion of Subjects Losing 3 Lines or More in ETDRS BCVA. [ Time Frame: Baseline to Day 120 ]Visual function was assessed using the ETDRS protocol, for which numerical scores range from 0 to 100 (roughly equivalent to 20/10 vision as measured by Snellen). A higher score represents better functioning. A positive number represents an increase in number of letters read correctly. One line is equivalent to 5 letters, so a loss of 3 lines is a loss of 15 letters.
- Proportion of Subjects With ETDRS BCVA of 20/40 or Better. [ Time Frame: Baseline to Day 120 ]Visual function was assessed using the ETDRS protocol, for which numerical scores range from 0 to 100 (roughly equivalent to 20/10 vision as measured by Snellen). A higher score represents better functioning. A positive number represents an increase in number of letters read correctly. 20/40 Snellen corresponds to a range of 69-73 letters by ETDRS.
- Proportion of Subjects With Adverse Events. [ Time Frame: Baseline to Day 120 ]

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 50 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- ≥50 years of age with a diagnosis of wet AMD
- Subjects who have received 3 injections of Lucentis or Avastin or Eylea within 12 months prior to screening
- Active subfoveal CNV secondary to AMD (leakage on FA)
- Presence of residual subretinal or intraretinal fluid on Cirrus or Spectralis SDOCT
- SDOCT in the 1 mm central macular subfield on the retinal map analysis of ≥250 μm at screening
- ETDRS BCVA of ≥25 and ≤73 letters (approximately 20/320 and 20/40 on the Snellen scale) at screening and on Day 0
- In the fellow eye, ETDRS BCVA of 20/400 or better
- Subject with serous pigment epithelial detachment (PED) (any part of which may be subfoveal) with intraretinal and/or subretinal fluid may be included
Exclusion Criteria:
- Most recent IVT injection of Lucentis or Avastin fewer than 28 days and more than 65 days prior to screening
- Most recent IVT injection of Eylea fewer than 42 days and more than 79 days prior to screening
- Previous photodynamic therapy (PDT) or Macugen® at any time point
- Focal thermal laser or grid laser within 3 months prior to Day 0
- Use of IVT, subtenon or subconjunctival steroids within 3 months prior to Day 0
- Use of topical ophthalmic corticosteroids 2 weeks prior to Day 0
- Intraocular surgery, including cataract surgery, and / or laser of any type within 3 months prior to Day 0 or anticipated need for ocular surgery or ophthalmic laser treatment during the study period
- Subjects previously treated with, or are currently receiving treatment with another investigational agent or device for neovascular AMD in the study eye
- Retinal total lesion size >12 disc areas (30.5 mm2), including blood, scars and neovascularization as assessed by FA in the study eye
- Presence of a fibrovascular PED extending underneath the center of the fovea
- Presence of retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP) lesions
- Presence of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) (if suspected, Indocyanine Green Angiography (ICG) should be performed at the discretion of the Investigator)
- Subretinal hemorrhage in the study eye if any of the following is true: (i) the subretinal hemorrhage represents 50% or more of the total lesion area; (ii) subfoveal blood is 1 or more disc areas in size (iii) subfoveal blood where the fovea is surrounded by less than 270 degrees of visible CNV on FA
- Scar or fibrosis making up >50% of total lesion area in the study eye
- Anatomic damage to the center of the fovea including fibrosis, scarring or atrophy
- History of a retinal pigment epithelial tear
- History of vitreous hemorrhage within 4 weeks prior to screening in the study eye
- Clinical evidence of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema or any other vascular disease affecting the retina, other than AMD, in either eye
- Uncontrolled glaucoma defined as: (i) as intraocular pressure ≥25 mmHg despite treatment with anti glaucoma medication in the study eye or (ii) by the Investigator
- Prior trabeculectomy or other filtration surgery in the study eye (prior laser trabeculoplasty is allowed)

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01414153

Study Director: | Dario A Paggiarino, MD | Lpath, Inc. |
Responsible Party: | Lpath, Inc. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01414153 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
LT1009-Oph-003 |
First Posted: | August 11, 2011 Key Record Dates |
Results First Posted: | October 17, 2016 |
Last Update Posted: | October 17, 2016 |
Last Verified: | August 2016 |
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
Plan to Share IPD: | No |
choroidal neovascularization age-related macular degeneration iSONEP sonepcizumab Lucentis |
ranibizumab Avastin bevacizumab Eylea aflibercept |
Macular Degeneration Choroidal Neovascularization Retinal Degeneration Retinal Diseases Eye Diseases Choroid Diseases Uveal Diseases Neovascularization, Pathologic Metaplasia Pathologic Processes Bevacizumab |
Ranibizumab Aflibercept Antibodies, Monoclonal Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological Antineoplastic Agents Angiogenesis Inhibitors Angiogenesis Modulating Agents Growth Substances Physiological Effects of Drugs Growth Inhibitors Immunologic Factors |