Cognitive Remediation and Work Therapy in the Initial Phase of Substance Abuse Treatment
|Substance Abuse Substance Dependence Cognitive Impairment||Behavioral: Cognitive Training + Work Therapy Behavioral: Work Therapy||Phase 2|
|Study Design:||Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
|Official Title:||Cognitive Remediation and Work Therapy in the Initial Phase of Substance Abuse Treatment|
- Days of Sobriety in First 90 Days [ Time Frame: 3 months ]Abstinence will be determined by toxicology screening, breathalyzer and substance abuse calendar weekly during 3 months of active intervention. Days of sobriety has a range of 0 to 90 with higher being a better outcome.
- Days of Use in Prior 30 Days [ Time Frame: 30 Days Prior to 6 month follow-up ]Days of Use based on Time-Line Follow-back, Toxicology Screen, Breathalyzer, and Chart Review. The range at 6 month follow-up is 0 to 30 days of use with more days being a worse outcome.
- Weeks of Sobriety [ Time Frame: 26 weeks ]0 to 26 Weeks. Higher number of Weeks is better.
- Attention Index [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3 month and 6 month follow-up ]Index comprised on Trails A and Continuous Performance Test. T scores for the assessments are averaged. T scores range from 30 to 80 with a mean of 50. Higher scores are better.
- Processing Speed Index [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months ]Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) Digit Coding and Symbol Search. T scores for the assessments are averaged. T scores range from 30 to 80 with a mean of 50. Higher scores are better.
- Verbal and Visual Learning and Memory [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months ]Brief Visual-Spatial Memory Test (BVMT) and Hopkins Verbal Learning and Memory Test (HVLT). Total Score T Scores for tests were averaged. T score range is 30 to 80 with a mean of 50. Higher scores are better.
- Verbal and Visual Working Memory [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3 Month, 6 Months ]WAIS Digit Span and Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS) Spatial Span. T Scores are averaged. T Scores range from 30 to 80 with a mean of 50. Higher scores are better.
- Executive Function [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months ]Mazes, Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (WCST) Perseverative Error, Non-Perseverative Error, Conceptual Level. T Scores for each variable were averaged together. T Scores have a range of 30 to 80 with a mean of 50. Higher scores are better.
- Global Index [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months ]Comprised of the average of 5 Index T Scores (Attention, Processing Speed, Visual and Verbal Memory and Learning, Working Memory and Executive Function). T Scores range from 30 to 80 with a mean of 50. Higher scores are better.
|Study Start Date:||December 2010|
|Study Completion Date:||December 2014|
|Primary Completion Date:||December 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
Experimental: Cognitive Training + Work Therapy
Cognitive Training using auditory and visual Positscience software 5 hours/per week for 13 weeks.
Work Therapy for 15 hours per week at half minimum wage doing entry level duties at medical center job sites, supervised by regular medical center staff.
Behavioral: Cognitive Training + Work Therapy
Cognitive training for 5 hours per week for 13 weeks and 15 hours of work therapy
Active Comparator: Work Therapy Only
Same work therapy but for 20 hours per week.
Behavioral: Work Therapy
20 hours per week of work therapy
This proposal aims to pilot test a cognitive remediation therapy (CRT) combined with work therapy (WT) as an adjunct to the initial phase of outpatient substance abuse treatment. There is ample research evidence of cognitive impairment across substance abuse disorders, particularly in the early phase of recovery. Cognitive impairment has been associated with poorer substance abuse treatment outcomes and may be remediated through programs of exercises that target these impairments. The investigators have previously reported on a model of providing CRT with work therapy (WT) in an outpatient context for people with psychotic disorders, which showed significant improvements in executive function and working memory, and in important functional outcomes such as work performance and sustained work activity. The investigators propose to apply this same approach to a sample of participants recruited from a 30-day residential program for substance abusers who are beginning their recovery. When they are discharged, they will be able to continue WT, which may encourage their engagement in CRT and in substance abuse outpatient services.
Our Specific Aims are: 1. Test the feasibility and tolerability of CRT & WT in the early phase of substance abuse treatment. 2. Obtain effect size for CRT & WT compared to WT alone on a primary substance abuse outcome measure (Days of Use) for a future R01 RCT submission. 3. Obtain effect sizes for secondary outcomes (e.g. neurocognition).
The investigators propose to accomplish these aims by randomizing 50 participants who wish to receive WT services into two conditions: 25 will be assigned to 15 hours of WT plus 5 hours of CRT each week (CRT+WT) and 25 will be assigned to an active control of 20 hours of WT. The active intervention will be for 13 weeks. CRT will be comprised of a repetitive training on a hierarchy of progressive visual and auditory exercise from Positscience. WT will involve paid work activity in a placement of their choosing on the medical center campus. Participants will be paid the same hourly rate (half federal minimum wage) for their time in CRT and WT. Comprehensive assessments will be performed at intake, 3 months and 6 months. These will include substance abuse, cognitive, and psychosocial outcomes as well as adherence to treatment. During the 3 months of active intervention participants will have weekly observed urine toxicology screens, breathalyzer tests and PDA assessments, as well as monthly work performance evaluations. Data analyses will include random effects regression models, as well as models of moderator and mediator effects on the primary outcome of PDA. If meaningful effects are found, these results will guide a subsequent R01 submission.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01410110
|United States, Connecticut|
|VA Connecticut Healthcare System|
|West Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06516|
|Principal Investigator:||Morris D Bell, Ph.D.||Yale University School of Medicine and VACHS|