Anterior Prolift Versus Posterior Prolift for Pelvic Floor Prolapse
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01392417|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : July 12, 2011
Last Update Posted : July 3, 2014
Women who had surgery for pelvic floor prolapse underwent surgery by anterior Prolift or Posterior prolift at least a year after the surgery.
The data from the charts and from telephone conversations with the patients will be entered to a database. Physical examination data will also be incorporated.
|Condition or disease|
|Pelvic Floor Prolapse|
|Study Type :||Observational|
|Actual Enrollment :||140 participants|
|Observational Model:||Case Control|
|Study Start Date :||February 2009|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||January 2013|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||June 2013|
- Symptoms of pelvic floor prolapse [ Time Frame: One year after surgery ]We will question the women if they have a feeling of a mass protruding through the labia. Physical examination data will also be incorporated.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01392417
|Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Western Galilee Hospital|
|Clinics of Dr Neuman|
|Tel Aviv, Israel|